Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it ain't there.Not it hasn't.
What you cite is not a formula.
There were several different competing ideas on what the formula was and they were all based on the Bible.
One however also was based on tradition.
You're missing our points & interjecting pointless contentions, but we forgive you.quote=Montalban;That's not the point. Why you interject in a conversation I'm having with Standing Up when you're missing the point is beyond me.
Perhaps your need for "details" is a manufactured one.However the details of the birth were not witnessed by me therefore I would need to have that information passed on to me. If you're a sola scriptura buff, then to continue the analogy my sister would have written down an account and passed it on to me rather than just tell me.
That is just anti-social pomposity. Leave hubris like that out of your posts & you'll get more mileage.Had you actually read what I wrote
You like to take words & run to the illogical extreme with them, I notice. This time it's "result".IF as you now put it that one only need be a witness to the 'result' of an event - as your put in your analogy of me and my sister* then ANYONE who saw people preaching that Christ has risen could be called a 'witness'.
This is the kind of disrespect you give that you can't take. When will it end?Also, when you can find some evidence for sola scriptura from the Bible itself, that would be really handy - as it's part of the OP
If you'd like to have a civil conversation without insulting us, that would be great!If you'd like to address how the books of the bible chose themselves that would be great too.
Fascinating opinion. Hear it all the time from lovers of tradition.*-by the way she never had children and she's passed on.
You missed his point. Some of us do find the quoted connections incredibly tied-in, fascinating, revealing, and inspiring.
*snip*
Beware the traditions of men!....Fascinating opinion. Hear it all the time from lovers of tradition.
Beware the traditions of men!
KJV) Mark 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, [as] the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
That's very big of you. Nothing you've said has added any information to that 'point' you claim I'm missing.You're missing our points & interjecting pointless contentions, but we forgive you.
(In contrast)
Col 2:19 And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.
What was it that you didn't understand about those Scriptures I postedExactly!
If you can admit it's there when we show it to you, we can get back to a normal & sane conversation.That's very big of you. Nothing you've said has added any information to that 'point' you claim I'm missing.
If you can provide evidence from scripture for having only scripture to rely on then we can get back to the OP
If you can admit it's there when we show it to you, we can get back to a normal & sane conversation.
Another words the RCC/EOs "scripture and tradition" vs the Protestants "sola/solo scripturaIf you can admit it's there when we show it to you, we can get back to a normal & sane conversation.
Now we have to argue semantics and grammar?Do you mean "In other words..." ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?