• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Robert the Pilegrim

Senior Veteran
Nov 21, 2004
2,151
75
65
✟25,187.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Beastt said:
If people read your post and base their assumption on what they read, and several of them assume the same thing, the fault for the wrong assumption goes to?

A) The lack of clarity in your post

B) The inability of readers to know what you meant
B.1) The unwillingness of readers to absorb another viewpoint different from the stereotypes they have constructed.
C) The owner of the website upon which you posted

D) The invisible man behind the undetectable curtain
 
Upvote 0

Robert the Pilegrim

Senior Veteran
Nov 21, 2004
2,151
75
65
✟25,187.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
AnEmpiricalAgnostic said:
your god™
Who are you claiming has a trademark on the word "god"? (or "your god")?
Why do you think they have such a trademark?
Although at first glance this seems like a reasonable statement, I don’t think you could really make a scientific case for any involvement in the physical world.
Yes, that is more or less what I've been saying.
[God values faith]
Doesn’t this reek of a convenient excuse for why there is no evidence now?
You mistake "no physical evidence" for "no evidence".
 
Upvote 0

AnEmpiricalAgnostic

Agnostic by Fact, Atheist by Epiphany
May 25, 2005
2,740
186
51
South Florida
Visit site
✟26,987.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian

So I guess I didn’t fail to follow your point.

I see. This seems to be a common resolution to these lines of discussion I have with theists. I find that theists often claim to have “evidence” for their belief in their god™ but when they are asked to supply this “evidence” it always comes down to the non-physical variety. In your case this is rationalized by claiming that your god™ places a premium on faith. The one thing I haven’t heard yet is why. Apparently your god™, according to your bible, never had a problem manifesting physically to verify his existence (personally killing people, wrestling people, etc.) in the past. I simply wonder why the conspicuous lack of physical evidence today doesn’t raise suspicion on the part of the believer. Is it the simple assertion that you god™ all of a sudden places a premium on faith and doesn’t want to leave any physical evidence?

Robert the Pilegrim said:
Who are you claiming has a trademark on the word "god"? (or "your god")? Why do you think they have such a trademark?
I speak to theists of different religions and different denominations. Each one has a different brand of god™. I put a ™ on it as a reminder that your god™ is but one of the many gods that have been postulated over the years. It’s a constant reminder that your present belief is just one version that has (likely) been handed down to you from your parents (that just happened to believe in your particular brand).
 
Upvote 0

Robert the Pilegrim

Senior Veteran
Nov 21, 2004
2,151
75
65
✟25,187.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
AnEmpiricalAgnostic said:
Apparently your god™, according to your bible, never had a problem manifesting physically to verify his existence.
To be picky he manifested physically only a handful of times (the exact number depending on your interpretation of certain passages).

More generally read my response to Beastt.
 
Upvote 0

AnEmpiricalAgnostic

Agnostic by Fact, Atheist by Epiphany
May 25, 2005
2,740
186
51
South Florida
Visit site
✟26,987.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Robert the Pilegrim said:
To be picky he manifested physically only a handful of times
What does it really matter how many times anyway? All that is important is that your god™ could pony up physical evidence if he wanted to. The only explanation as to why he doesn’t is a convenient premium on faith all of a sudden.

The more important question is whether it is likely that your god™ places a premium on faith or if it’s only your religion. In the case of the former it really wouldn’t make a difference one way or the other to the entity. In the later, however, it is essential to its survival.
 
Upvote 0

Beastt

Legend
Mar 12, 2004
12,966
1,019
Arizona
✟40,898.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
In other words, it's possible that "faith" is the cover story and it is also possible that God has never appeared and that the claims in the Bible are only that -- claims. And if God doesn't exist, that would explain why he never appears, why we have free-will, why there seems to be no discernable pattern to the answering of prayer, why God has never verified anything in the Bible and why the Bible continues to be re-interpreted in an attempt to present itself as being in greater alignment with that which we have learned through science.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Robert the Pilegrim said:
To be picky he manifested physically only a handful of times (the exact number depending on your interpretation of certain passages).

More generally read my response to Beastt.

Or your religious faith. Most notably, the second coming of Jesus Christ in the forms of Haille Selassie (sp?) and David Koresh.
 
Upvote 0

Robert the Pilegrim

Senior Veteran
Nov 21, 2004
2,151
75
65
✟25,187.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Physical manifestation. Most of those appear to me to be visions.
AnEmpiricalAgnostic said:
What does it really matter how many times anyway?
If the number of physical manifestations mattered I wouldn't have written "picky point".
The overall numbers of interventions matter because they demonstrate a pattern of behaviour.
All that is important is that your god™ could pony up physical evidence if he wanted to. The only explanation as to why he doesn’t is a convenient premium on faith all of a sudden.
"All of a sudden"?
Abraham, the Hebrews during the Exodus, Daniel, the Jews during the exile, to take examples off the top of my head, all had their faith tested and were called to faithfulness.
The more important question is whether it is likely that your god™ places a premium on faith or if it’s only your religion.
Or both.
 
Upvote 0