• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is science irrational?

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
A truth can become definitive on an individual basis. For example; many Christians have a spiritual experience that makes the truth of Jesus obvious and undeniable. I am one of those Christians.
Sure, but that you find your internal experiences so convincing does not necessarily make them an accurate description of reality, does it? All you are doing is asserting that the rest of the world is wrong.
Scientist might discover evidence that Earth is/was/has been visited by extraterrestrial aliens. This evidence should be presented in a testable, falsifiable hypothesis, and subjected to peer review, unless your intent was simply to cherry-pick information as you see fit to prop up your beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
That fact that the scientific method excludes the desire for truth in favor of the desire to question reality and form hypothesis. When the reason to question reality and form hypothesis should be to figure out the truth.
Why do you think that? So that when "science" doesn't seek to confirm your religious opinion, you can justify some other method of confirming it?
 
Upvote 0

Cearbhall

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2013
15,118
5,744
United States
✟129,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
If the purpose is the former, then how can any individual ever know if they are correct in their beliefs about reality?
We know as best as we can, and we get closer every year. I don't see why I should be concerned about the fact that we aren't all-knowing gods. It seems silly to fret over the fact that we can never truly be 100% sure in the way that you mean it.
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
There is evidence that suggests dinosaurs are not millions of years old. How I interpret that evidence is completely up to me.

Search for evidence of young dinosaurs on google and you might be surprised.

Take it all with a grain of salt of course.
Do you need dinosaurs to have existed thousands, not millions, of years ago, for your beliefs to be true?
 
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
The same question asked a different way, is nothing but the probability that one or other ways of writing the answer down: will ultimately be ____.

I think in the context of the question, you should probably consider: attempting to relate science to itself, under the auspice of a demonstrable connection between what "is" and the assumed relationship between that and "irrational" or irrational.
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
I agree. My point is from an atheistic perspective, science is irrational, but from a theistic perspective science is very rational.
What does science have to say about a "God" that allegedly walked and talked in a garden that has no evidence of having existed, poofed people and animals into existence, and later, in a manner contrary to the modern understanding of genetics, repopulated the planet with a tiny group of individuals and animals that survived a global flood in an unbuildable boat, a flood that killed the dinosaurs in a manner that only *appears* to be 65 million years ago, because the Earth is really only somehow 6000 years old, yet remains, by every objective measure to date indistinguishable from nothing? Is this science? No?
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
I'm saying personally I have found the answer and I found it by honestly questioning myself and reality with the intent of finding truth. You seem to think this is an irrational thing to do?
It depends. By any objective measure, does your methodology differ from self-deception?
 
Upvote 0