Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes. That is how we learn. Because aft were that comes, "I wonder why it did that?" And then finding out.The most common phrase in science: "Oops, I didn't mean for that to happen."
``the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept Him, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. But you know Him, for He lives with you and will be in you." John 14:17.
God is Absolute Truth and Truth is God. God is as well Love and Love is God. Just Love like Jesus Christ does. Jesus loves me, satan doesn't love me. Choose the side. One, who loves me, has time for me. Read then all and try to debunk it using own brain, not just trolling ``it is not top ranked human, so it must be wrong.'' Truth is God, Love is God. Therefore, the only valid goal of Science is to get know God, while loving own authors. A proof is the knowledge of the God's mind. Therefore to prove God to God is easy.
The demand for highest impact factor of the publishing journal (or the citation index of author) is the famous Fallacy of Authority. Not the authority is bad for science, but the fallacy occurs, when we replace Truth with Authority. More authority - more probability of correctness, but correctness always possible despite the authority. However a Hitler-like human, who has lost all authority, always says lies even saying 2+2 is 4, because the truth by definition must have reliable source - God of Truth. Thus, the satan and his evil spirits are total liars. ``When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." John 8:44.
The problems of Science are multiplying in exponential progression. Thus, something is wrong in basement of Scientific Building. Some father of Science said something stupid. And now we do not know the 95% composition of Reality (we called it Dark Energy and Dark Matter problems).
Truth can not be falsified. Thus, the Science is confirmable, not falsifiable in Popper's Scientific Criterion: the satan has twisted our mind, that if we would get to heaven, we will confuse it with hell. We even think, that death is natural; no, death is the name of satan and, thus, all human deaths are in causal connection: between the death beds is flying the Angel of Death - satan. Thus, his velocity is 0.08 c, much less than maximum of c. All human deaths are technically conducted by satan's hand: ``he was a murderer from the beginning" John 8:44, "When the devil had finished all this tempting, he left Him until an opportune time." Luke 4:13, “Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in Me.'' John 14:30.
Which is why Gould attempted to give theists a way out with non-overlapping magisteria. The problem is when theists assert what science can and cannot do.Science and religion use different ontologies. That doesn't make one superior to the other, it just makes them different.
``the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept Him, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. But you know Him, for He lives with you and will be in you." John 14:17.
God is Absolute Truth and Truth is God. God is as well Love and Love is God. Just Love like Jesus Christ does. Jesus loves me, satan doesn't love me. Choose the side. One, who loves me, has time for me. Read then all and try to debunk it using own brain, not just trolling ``it is not top ranked human, so it must be wrong.'' Truth is God, Love is God. Therefore, the only valid goal of Science is to get know God, while loving own authors. A proof is the knowledge of the God's mind. Therefore to prove God to God is easy.
The demand for highest impact factor of the publishing journal (or the citation index of author) is the famous Fallacy of Authority. Not the authority is bad for science, but the fallacy occurs, when we replace Truth with Authority. More authority - more probability of correctness, but correctness always possible despite the authority. However a Hitler-like human, who has lost all authority, always says lies even saying 2+2 is 4, because the truth by definition must have reliable source - God of Truth. Thus, the satan and his evil spirits are total liars. ``When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." John 8:44.
The problems of Science are multiplying in exponential progression. Thus, something is wrong in basement of Scientific Building. Some father of Science said something stupid. And now we do not know the 95% composition of Reality (we called it Dark Energy and Dark Matter problems).
Truth can not be falsified. Thus, the Science is confirmable, not falsifiable in Popper's Scientific Criterion: the satan has twisted our mind, that if we would get to heaven, we will confuse it with hell. We even think, that death is natural; no, death is the name of satan and, thus, all human deaths are in causal connection: between the death beds is flying the Angel of Death - satan. Thus, his velocity is 0.08 c, much less than maximum of c. All human deaths are technically conducted by satan's hand: ``he was a murderer from the beginning" John 8:44, "When the devil had finished all this tempting, he left Him until an opportune time." Luke 4:13, “Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in Me.'' John 14:30.
Which is why Gould attempted to give theists a way out with non-overlapping magisteria. The problem is when theists assert what science can and cannot do.
I can give you my top Scientist's CV. Just in private letter to dmart@hot.ee. You will be amazed of my top papers!
Mainly the established religious dogmas or scientific laws cannot be broken nor deemed false.
As a matter of interest here is what Einstein said of Newton's ideas of gravity.Yeah, it's not like Albert Einstein did that when he showed that Newton's ideas of gravity were wrong...
Oh wait, yes he did...
Einstein said:Enough of this. Newton, forgive me; you found the only way which, in your age, was just about possible for a man of highest thought and creative power.
The concepts, which you created, are even today still guiding our thinking in physics, although we now know that they will have to be replaced by others farther removed from the sphere of immediate experience, if we aim at a profounder understanding of relationships.
Science deniers ARE deniers . The evidence says that they’re wrong not the scientists .
Yeah, it's not like Albert Einstein did that when he showed that Newton's ideas of gravity were wrong...
Oh wait, yes he did...
No, there are deniers. And the deniers are those that choose to believe that they, despite having no relevant education or experience, have outwitted or know more than people with actual expertise in an issue.There is no such thing as a science denier. That is a mythical character created by people who are incapable of defending their position when faced with evidence contradictory to their faith based beliefs.
No, there are deniers. And the deniers are those that choose to believe that they, despite having no relevant education or experience, have outwitted or know more than people with actual expertise in an issue.
Flat earthers, creationists, anti-vaxxers, climate change deniers... just to name a few.There is no such thing as a science denier.
You have just described creationism. Hovind is famous for this.That is a mythical character created by people who are incapable of defending their position when faced with evidence contradictory to their faith based beliefs.
Yes, this is every professional creationist, ever.In its purest sense, I think it is fair to define science as truth-seeking, since if someone wasn't interested in the truth we would say they are being unscientific.
Or, much like creationists who perform "research" and claim evolution doesn't exist.The problem comes in the impurities, such as tobacco companies performing scientific research which proves smoking does not cause cancer.
Nope, creationists can't be bothered by the facts.They are only interested in certain truths. Otherwise they are not interested at all.
You're right, evidence suggesting an "intelligent Creator" is non-existent.Likewise we have self-professed "scientists" who are only interested in the truths which suggest there is no intelligent Creator--since that is "obviously wrong."
Flat earthers, creationists, anti-vaxxers, climate change deniers... just to name a few.
You have just described creationism. Hovind is famous for this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?