Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The earliest life that we find in the fossil record dates back to the Archean eon I believe (starting around four billion years ago). Do you know what we find in those rocks? Single celled life and nothing else.
First of all, there was no singular 'group' of specific believers that founded science. The persuit of scientific knowledge grew out of numerous different cultures and beliefs around the world.
I am not "attacking the opposing viewpoint". I am merely pointing out that your beliefs were shown to be wrong a long long time ago.When in a corner, attack the opposing viewpoint. I get that.
Unfortunately for your effort, I'm not arguing Creationism at this time.
Fossils only are formed by hard bone or shell structures.
Yes, there is.
Umm no, the earliest clear fossils are stromatolites:Fossils only are formed by hard bone or shell structures.
I believe the big guy doesn't take too kindly to bearing false witness either, you should be careful there.
tevans9129;n45092 said:Did you previously agree to a discussion if we both would agree to answer all questions that we may be asked? Yes.
Did you honor your word and answered all questions that I asked you? No.
End of discussion.
Are you saying that God was the one that put the "dinosaur fossils" here? If He did put those fossils here, why and how were they supposed to "fool us"? Do you have evidence that will support your views?Like the dinosaur fossils God put here to fool us!
Are you saying that God was the one that put the "dinosaur fossils" here? If He did put those fossils here, why and how were they supposed to "fool us"? Do you have evidence that will support your views?
I suggest we start with my point about humans and chimpanzees, since it's a pair of species for which we have lots of genetic evidence, and which includes the species most people are really interested in: us.
Did you understand my point about mutations and differences between humans and chimps?
Are you saying that God was the one that put the "dinosaur fossils" here? If He did put those fossils here, why and how were they supposed to "fool us"? Do you have evidence that will support your views?
Which ones are next then?
This is a rather severe problem of yours. When people do not answer your questions in a manner that you approve of you use that as an excuse not to answer questions. You have supported practically none of your beliefs.I am ready to address your first post directed to me as soon as you respond to my post #71.
This is a rather severe problem of yours. When people do not answer your questions in a manner that you approve of you use that as an excuse not to answer questions. You have supported practically none of your beliefs.
Once again, you claimed to value honesty. Yet when people respond to you honestly and as well as they can in response to your very often very poorly formed questions you accuse them of dishonesty or not answering your questions.
It is past time for you to start answering some of the questions asked of you. Do you have any answers? Or are you merely looking for excuses not to answer the questions posted to you?
I would not hold to 6k years but neither would I accept billions of years, unless, someone can provide verifiable evidence of when, how and when space, matter, energy, time and the natural laws came into existence and in what sequence. After years of asking that question, the best I have gotten was, have no idea.I was being somewhat tounge in cheek. There are those in the YEC circles who say that God created the world with the appearance of age though, in their view, the world is only 6000 years old.
I would not hold to 6k years but neither would I accept billions of years, unless, someone can provide verifiable evidence of when, how and when space, matter, energy, time and the natural laws came into existence and in what sequence. After years of asking that question, the best I have gotten was, have no idea.
I would not hold to 6k years but neither would I accept billions of years, unless, someone can provide verifiable evidence of when, how and when space, matter, energy, time and the natural laws came into existence and in what sequence. After years of asking that question, the best I have gotten was, have no idea.
I am willing to answer all questions that you may ask with plausible, verifiable answers and if I do not understand the question, I will ask for clarification or rephrasing and will then answer the question? No excuses, such as it is malformed, it is stupid, it is not relevant, etc. but clear, straightforward answers. I will also address each point that you present, IF, you are willing to reciprocate in like manner, are you? My offer to answer all questions is not unilateral.
"I would expect this to continue."
That is an excellent "expectation" because I would be shocked if anyone has the courage to engage in a serious discussion with the purpose of determining fact from agenda and beliefs. Talking points do not necessarily equate to fact and if one cannot answer all questions asked, then it is very likely they are not as knowledgeable as they would like for other to believe, IMO.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?