- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,820
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Don't forget trace fossils.Do you realize your error now?
Jellyfish have left fossil imprints. Stomatolites are far older and they have left fossils. Fossils are not limited to hard body parts.
Good observation. Jesus put the face napkin "in it's place", but likely wore the linen wrap as he would have needed to cover himself with something when he appeared to Mary. Of course the fact of a separate cloth for covering the face of the dead blows the Shroud of Turin, which has a facial image on the shroud itself, out of the water.
I still don't see any evidence in that picture that "someone arose".
Darwin was not St. Paul nor were his writings epistles. The science stands on evidence, not the musings of a man.It is interesting to know that Darwin, in later life, regretted writing his book and said that his theory was "the unborn idea of a young man." If that is what the founder of Evolution said, then that must put a bit of dent in it.
PRINCETON, NJ -- More than four in 10 Americans continue to believe that God created humans in their present form 10,000 years ago, a view that has changed little over the past three decades.
In actual fact that although there are many scientific indications supporting Evolution there are crucial areas where science has no answer and in fact, science is silent. One example is that there are no "inbetween" species between plants and animals,animals and humans, and different evolutionary stages of human development. All science can come up with is a couple of bone fragments on which they have built a whole species of human. It was discovered later that the bone came from a pig and not a human at all.
Someone arose here:
Yes, indeed.Someone left a piece of cloth behind.
Then you'd better conclude it some other way -- like by faith.Unlike my footprint picture, your claim can't be concluded from the available evidence.
The claim that all complex life forms evolved from one single cell is the largest con ever perpetrated on the world, IMO. Biology categorizes from the simplest cell to the most complex and that work is informative, interesting and should be applauded.
However, the “tree of life” that I have seen do not provide indisputable evidence of what specifically evolved from one species to another species starting with the first cell and consummating with the last species. It is speculation and I do believe the sequence or the timing can be proven. Furthermore, all trees do not agree with one another, which one is correct, if any?
I have seen no one in this group that can prove the immediate predecessor of the Equidae or bovine family nor can any evidence be shown of a different species evolving from either of these.
Is it not amazing how many different species have been on earth for what some claim as millions of years but they have not evolved into any different species during that time? Some have adapted to changing environments so there are some small differences but they are still within the same species.
Then presumably a historian can't talk abot the American civil war, or, better yet, first century Palestine.
Evolution is philosophy (or, even a faith/religion) disguised as science.
The validity of a scientific theory isn't dependent on popular support of the general public. Plus, the support for YECism has been on a downward trend in the U.S. for a couple decades now, and based on age demographics will continue that downward trend in the future.
The jellyfish fossils were examples of one sort of trace fossils. Their bodies were not preserved at all, just their imprint in the sediments.Don't forget trace fossils.
So the level of debate will drop below 40%. I agree.
If support levels are not important, why are you referring to them?
Historical claim: there was an ancient Roman settlement in the area where I live in Belgium.
Proof: last year, during digging works for a new building in that very region, the ruins of an ancient Roman villa were uncovered. Roman coins, Roman art, Roman pottery, Roman mozaics,.... All right there in the ground. When dated, it matches the period of the settlement.
Once America catches up with the rest of the world, there will be nothing to debate, will there?
Again relying on popular opinion?
Will they vote on you being right?
We all look forward to such love.
I don't have to rely upon public opinion. I have got the almost unanimous opinion of biologists world wide to go on. That sort of unanimity amongst people qualified to evaluate the evidence does not arise out of nowhere. The only get out open to creationists is to postulate a grand conspiracy theory amongst all the world's scientists, and, like all conspiracy theories, it is barking mad.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?