• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is Carthage in the bible?

rhawk

I'm a CAT-HOLIC, proud cat parent & Catholic.
Site Supporter
Mar 25, 2015
3,135
3,645
Montana
✟465,361.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
I have read the bible from cover to cover and found references to Greece, Egypt, Rome and more, but I have not found a single reference to Carthage. I suppose Carthage may have been referenced by another name.... Since it was powerful enough to take n Rome in the Punic wars and held a lot of land, was in north Africa and had part of modern Spain, I would have expected them to be in the Bible. Does anyone know why they do not seem to be?
 

John Hyperspace

UnKnown ReMember
Oct 3, 2016
2,385
1,272
55
Hyperspace
✟50,143.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

If it's not in the bible it isn't relevant to gospel. The bible isn't God recording history events for the sake of history; it's God recording His gospel for all future generations. Only historic events which are relevant to the gospel are included as analogue.
 
Upvote 0

RC1970

post tenebras lux
Jul 7, 2015
1,904
1,558
✟88,194.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
The Carthaginians would have had to have gone through Egypt to have dealings with Israel.

They may be the Lubims (Libyans) mentioned in 2 Chronicles 12:3.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Legends concerning queen of Tyre, Dido who is said to have founded Carthage connect her great aunt Jezebel to king Ahab of Israel via marriage. Both Ahab and Jezebel are mentioned in the Bible.



 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

RC1970

post tenebras lux
Jul 7, 2015
1,904
1,558
✟88,194.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Other reasons Carthage is not mentioned in the Bible:

Carthage's main business was sea trade and Israel never developed a sea trade.

The glory days of the Carthaginians was during the intertestamental period (2nd,3rd and 4th centuries BC).
 
Upvote 0

roamer_1

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
738
337
Northwest Montana, USA
✟31,070.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Carthage was a Phoenician colony in origin - No, it is not mentioned in the Bible, unless it is the fabled Tarshish, as some have opined - The linkage is fair - The sea-going Phoenicians are a likely candidate... but I prefer the Britain/Tarshish linkage better, as there is no ready tin source in Carthage.
 
Upvote 0

Quid est Veritas?

In Memoriam to CS Lewis
Feb 27, 2016
7,319
9,223
South Africa
✟331,643.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Carthage is never mentioned in the Bible, which is a real shame. We have a distinct paucity of unbiased sources on Carthage, so a neutral biblical account would have been invaluable.

Tarshish is more likely Sardinia or Spain (Tartessos), but we really don't know.

Dido may have been fictional or an euhemerisation of Tanit, the major Carthaginian goddess. This is supported by many elements in her legend being clearly Greek misunderstandings or embellushments like the oxhide being cut up to secure the bursa of the city. The name Bursa is likely of semitic origin, not from the greek for oxhide.
That being said, an argument for historicity can be made on surviving texts and some epigraphic evidence of Shalmaneser III, but really not sufficiently to tie her to Ahab and Jezebel.
 
Upvote 0