Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They are. Would you feel okay about this if white people could discriminate against black fetuses? What makes it okay for people to do it in their own family?
Fetuses don't have phones or make art, they are too young to do that. They can grow or they can be killed.
If fetuses never exist because someone uses birth control, then how are they being "killed"?
In that case they are not so much being killed as being killed before they have the chance to be alive. The result is less babies of, on average, higher intelligence from people who would likely be better parents. Can you appreciate what I'm getting at?
Not at all. I don't think socio-economic status has anything to do with intelligence. So I don't think that more babies born to underprivileged families means more stupid babies.
I certainly don't see how it's discrimination. What would the logical solution be to your supposed discrimination? Either more lower class families use birth control, in which case there are more fetuses (?) being discriminated against, or more middle and upper class families have more babies?
You appear to be a very misguided eugenicist. There is infact almost no evidence that rich people are smarter. The Economist recently reported that private school children less intelligent than state school children overtake their government-educated counterparts by the age of 9. It's largely to do with environment, not genetics.In that case they are not so much being killed as being killed before they have the chance to be alive. The result is less babies of, on average, higher intelligence from people who would likely be better parents. Can you appreciate what I'm getting at?
You appear to be a very misguided eugenicist. There is infact almost no evidence that rich people are smarter. The Economist recently reported that private school children less intelligent than state school children overtake their government-educated counterparts by the age of 9. It's largely to do with environment, not genetics.
And far and away the best predictor of educational success is the educational level of the parents. Parents with a high level of education whill have children who are successful in mainstream education, and that correlates closely with economic success and staying out of trouble.You appear to be a very misguided eugenicist. There is infact almost no evidence that rich people are smarter. The Economist recently reported that private school children less intelligent than state school children overtake their government-educated counterparts by the age of 9. It's largely to do with environment, not genetics.
You fail logic.Poor uneducated people don't use it as much and tend to have many children while more affluent people tend to use it and have less children. Isn't it prejudiced to discriminate based on economic status?
Clearly, the affluent are discriminating against their own non-existent children for denying them birth. Or conception, for that matter.
Are you serious?Exactly!
Are you serious?
You said they were discriminating against non-existing children by denying them birth. That has nothing to do with the birth rate among blacks and hispanics, or caucasians for that matter.Yes, and its obvious. The birth rate of white people versus blacks and hispanics show this time and again. Its that simple.
Society is discriminating against fetuses of middle and upper class mothers.
In that case they are not so much being killed as being killed before they have the chance to be alive. The result is less babies of, on average, higher intelligence from people who would likely be better parents. Can you appreciate what I'm getting at?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?