• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

candle glow

whatever I want to be
Jan 2, 2012
2,035
181
Nairobi, Kenya
✟25,632.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I was recently engaged in a discussion with some atheists about proof of God's existence. I suggested that God deliberately set things up so that, at least we today, could not irrefutably prove his existence on the basis that God is looking for people who will search for him diligently as a sign of sincerity. I still believe that.

However, there IS something of "proof" which even an atheist may be able to appreciate, because it deals with legitimate dates, numbers, and events in history. I'll post it below and wait for feedback, if any.

The first half explains the back ground to the prophecy and the second half explains the technical stuff.

-----------

Prophecy is a cross between art and mathematics. It is both subjective and objective. The arty (or subjective) side is the most important, in terms of what it is teaching; but the mathematical (or objective) side appeals to skeptics who want measurable proof. Of course the real genius of genuine prophecy is in how the two can combine.



Prophecy can be objectively measurable at the same time that it illustrates and combines several powerful universal truths.


God won't waste his time with magic tricks just to entertain us. He's not likely to tell you that there'll be an accident in George St., Sydney tomorrow at noon, or that the stock market is going to go up by 32 points, because in the vastness of eternity these are only trivial incidents. The particular glimpses of the future that God chooses to give us are only those which have the most profound spiritual implications.


And what could have had more profound implications than the life and death of Jesus Christ? This is the dominant theme of all the prophecies in the part of the Bible which was written before Jesus was born. Some of these prophecies you might already be familiar with.


Most of us, for example, would have seen Christmas cards with something like this printed on them: "A virgin shall conceive and bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel." (Immanuel is a Hebrew word for 'God is with us'.) That prophecy comes from Isaiah 7:14.


At Easter we might see cards with these words from Isaiah 53: "He was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities, and the chastisement of our peace was upon him He was brought as a lamb to the slaughter; and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth."



Such prophecies paint a beautiful picture of the humble, loving Messiah that so many people failed to comprehend at the time when Jesus first appeared on the earth. But exactly who the prophecies are talking about is open to debate. You could technically argue that they are referring to someone besides Jesus. They may even be referring to a Messiah who has not yet come. Some of them don't even specifically say that they are talking about the Messiah.


To be certain that they are talking about Jesus of Nazareth, we need something more specific. Why couldn't the Bible just say something like, "The Messiah will be born in Bethlehem of Judea in the year 4 B.C. and his name will be Jesus."


Well, there is a prophecy, written centuries before Christ, which must stand as the ultimate proof that Jesus is the Messiah. In fact, it is the only passage in the entire Old Testament which actually uses the word "Messiah", and it specifically says that Christ (which is the Greek word for Messiah) will be "cut off" in 30 A.D. That is, in fact, the exact year when Jesus was crucified.


But we must warn people that to fully appreciate this prophecy, you'll need to pull out your calculators and do some arithmetic. Nothing fancy, mind you, but it will take a bit of concentration. (Note, you may want to get out a calculator to confirm the numbers).


For starters, there was no such thing as 30 A.D. at the time that the prophecy was written. There was no numbering system at all for one year as compared to another. Instead, you calculated things according to significant historical events. A bit like saying, "I started uni in the year that Menzies was elected Prime Minister."


If you're the arty type and find mathematics boring, then this chapter may be a bit of a drag. But if you want to see the most mathematically verifiable prophecy in the entire Bible, then the effort will definitely be worth it. So here goes. It's in:





Judea had been destroyed in the 6th Century B.C. Many Jews had been carried away as exiles into Babylon. Then, in 447 B.C., permission was given to the Jews to rebuild Jerusalem, and to be ruled by their own law. In Daniel 9:24-26, God tells Daniel that his "people" (i.e. the Jews) will, from the time that rebuilding started, have 490 years of history left. But seven years before the 490 years are up, God says that their "Messiah will be cut off".



(These remaining seven years will be particularly important when we come to our study of The Revelation later in this book, but for now, we will just focus on the period of 483 years that were left until Christ was to be "cut off".)


Artaxerxes, King of the Medes and the Persians, commanded Nehemiah in 447 B.C. to rebuild Jerusalem. A hundred years earlier, King Cyrus had allowed the Jews to rebuild their Temple. You can find this information in most history books. It is recorded in the Bible too


, but the Bible account, of course, does not have a date next to it. Nevertheless, 476 years later, in 30 A.D., Jesus Christ was crucified, as God had promised to Daniel.
(For those who are sharp enough to note that 447 and 30 do not add up to 476, don't forget that there is no such thing as a year marked "zero". Calendars go straight from the year 1 B.C. to the year 1 A.D., thus more or less skipping a year.)


Depending on which Bible translation you use, something needs to be explained before we can get to the discrepancy between 476 years as recorded in the history books and 483 years as prophesied in the Bible.


If you're reading a King James Version of the passage, you will find that God says to Daniel, "Seventy weeks are determined for your people." The word translated "week" is literally "seven", but it is also the Hebrew word for "week". In other words, "seventy sevens are determined for your people."



The Jews had a strong attraction to the number seven, which is used repeatedly in The Revelation as well. They broke time up into seven day periods (or weeks) and seven year periods (which were also called weeks).



GEN 29:27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.

GEN 29:28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.


For example, above is the famous story of Jacob being tricked into working an extra seven years before he could marry Rachel, because his future father-in-law had slipped Rachel's older sister, Leah, into his bed after he had completed his first seven years of labour for a bride.



In the 27th verse, the father-in-law says (King James Version), "Fulfil her week and we will give you this also for the service which you shall serve with me yet seven other years." It goes on to say (in verse 28), "And Jacob did so, and fulfilled his week, and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also."
The modern translations don't use the word "week". (e.g. Instead of seventy weeks, they just say things like "seven times seventy years".)


So God was telling Daniel that 490 years (or seven times seventy years) was "determined" for Daniel's people (the Jews).



Daniel 9:25 goes on: "From the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem, unto Messiah the Prince (Christ the Lord) shall be seven 7-year periods (49 years), plus sixty-two 7-year periods (434 years)."



Add these together and you will see that this gives you a total of 483 years.
The next verse (Daniel 9:26) says, "After the sixty-two 7-year periods, shall Messiah be cut off; but not for himself." The Today's English Version of the Bible translates this, "At the end of that time, God's chosen leader will be killed unjustly."



Because this is the only place in the entire Old Testament where the word "Messiah" is used, this prophecy, more than any other, is talking specifically about the long awaited Hebrew Messiah. You cannot say otherwise. And it gives a date when the Messiah will be "cut off" (or killed), "but not for himself".



Christ was executed as a criminal, but it was not for anything that he had done wrong; he died as the innocent sacrificial Lamb for the sins of the whole world, in 30 A.D.
Now let's look at the discrepancy.


The prophecy says that Christ would be cut off 483 years after the decree to rebuild Jerusalem; whereas the history books say that it was 476 years later that it actually happened. There is a difference of six years. How do we explain that?


The explanation comes from a comparison of calendars. We use a solar calendar with a year of 365 and a quarter days, or the exact period of time it takes the earth to orbit the sun. The Babylonian year was 354 days long. But the Bible uses a "prophetic year" of twelve equal 30-day months, totalling 360 days.


The Revelation uses the prophetic year of 360 days. It refers repeatedly to a period of three and a half years, but sometimes it uses months (42 months), and sometimes it uses days (1260 days). If we had used a solar calendar to calculate 42 months (or three and a half years), we would have arrived at a figure of 1278 days, and our calculations would have been out by 18 days.


So if we were to change the 483 years of Daniel's prophecy, computed at 360 days per year (for a total of 173,880 days), to solar years of 365 and a quarter days each, we would come up with exactly 476 years and 21 days! Go ahead and work it out for yourself.


There is no way that this prophecy can be pushed aside as contrived, or based on subjective interpretation. It is clearly talking about the promised Messiah, and it clearly gives the date when he died. If Jesus Christ was not the Messiah, then we must look for someone else who died in the same year.



How could such a prediction have been made hundreds of years ahead of time without help from God. Where is there any prediction in all history which can be more objectively proven to be supernatural than this one?


If you get nothing else from this book, let it be very clear to you right now that there is a God in heaven who has spoken to us through the Bible and, more importantly, he has spoken to us through his Messiah, Jesus Christ. Your very existence on this planet is for the purpose of gauging whether you are going to respond to God in faith, or whether you are going to go on doing your own selfish thing.


You cannot be neutral. You cannot argue that there is no evidence one way or the other. You cannot remain complacent. You will be judged eternally on the basis of how you respond to the voice of God coming through his Son, Jesus Christ.
 

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Was this post directed at atheists and other non-believers? You did post in a section where believers are supposed to do the answering. If however you were directing the post towards atheists, I'll gladly take a stab at answering.
 
Upvote 0

candle glow

whatever I want to be
Jan 2, 2012
2,035
181
Nairobi, Kenya
✟25,632.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hi Ana,

I had atheists in mind when I posted, though I wouldn't say it was "directed" at atheists. It's just a topic for discussion.

Although I labeled the thread as "irrefutable proof?" (with a question mark) I do not believe this prophecy is irrefutable in the sense that people have no choice but to accept it, so I'm fine to discuss it and eventually agree to disagree if it comes to that.
 
Upvote 0

Faulty

bind on pick up
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2005
9,467
1,019
✟87,489.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Also concerning Daniel...

He was the leader of the Chaldeans for a while, in his time. It was he who used this prophecy to arrange gifts to be brought to the Messiah when He appeared. A few centuries later, the Magi arrived in Jerusalem asking Herod where the one "born the King of the Jews" might be found, and brought to Him gold, frankincense, ant myrrh.

He was the one to present Cyrus with the scroll of Isaiah where God calls Cyrus by his name and description to do His will, over 100 years before Cyrus was even ever born. (Isa 44-45)

He was the one who went to prayer near the end of the 70 years of the Babylonian captivity, because he read in Jeremiah where God had specified the 70 years, which of course was exactly how many there were. (Dan 9:2)

It's also Daniel who wrote of the political events of region in chapter 11, from the time of Alexander the Great and his kingdom splitting into 4 divisions (v. 2-4), but also the subsequent histories if those divisions, filling in the silent years from Malachi to John the Baptist. So accurate are the details, it's well documented the accusations that the book of Daniel was written by someone else hundreds of years later, but this is a book which was included in the Septuagint, completed centuries before much of it came to pass.
 
Upvote 0

Faulty

bind on pick up
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2005
9,467
1,019
✟87,489.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My first point is directly related to the prophecy of the 70 weeks. It was through this prophecy those who who we commonly refer to as the "wise men" showed up to worship Jesus, because they believed what God had said and were expecting Him.

This entire portion of the event shows, at least in part, the prophecy given was true, and there is a God who declares the end from the beginning (Isa 46:9-10) that should be heeded. These people weren't just given a light from God to follow blindly, rather they knew exactly what the sign was for, the birth of the Messiah because they were expecting Him.

The other parts were other prophecies mentioned in Daniel which were fulfilled literally and precisely as well, just to heap proof upon proof, which I believe was your point in posting the '70 weeks' in the first place.
 
Upvote 0

candle glow

whatever I want to be
Jan 2, 2012
2,035
181
Nairobi, Kenya
✟25,632.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Ok faulty I see what you mean. Thanks for clarifying that. It is interesting that people would believe a prophecy enough to calculate it and act on it more than 400 years after it was written.

It must have been very satisfying for them to find that their faith was justified.
 
Upvote 0

candle glow

whatever I want to be
Jan 2, 2012
2,035
181
Nairobi, Kenya
✟25,632.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm always very suspicious of people promoting miraculous healings because it seems to take away from the teachings of Jesus.

Jesus himself said that an adulterous generation seeks a sign, and when he healed people he told them not to advertise it. (I can post those verses for anyone who is interested).

It seems , when it comes to miracles, people get hung up on what they can get from God and totally ignore their own part in what it means to follow Jesus, like his disciplines and expectations.

Something similar happened after one of the mass feedings Jesus presided over. The people wanted to make him a king right away, because of what he did for them. In the night Jesus slipped away unknown and the next day the people searched for him. When they found him he rebuked them because they only liked him because they wanted more miracles from him, rather than seeing the miracle as a evidence of his authority to tell them what to do with their lives.

If it's one thing people today do NOT want, is to be told what to do, not even if it is their God who is telling them.
 
Upvote 0

Cougar99

Newbie
Apr 13, 2012
10
0
✟22,623.00
Faith
Christian
Actually the decree was in 444 B.C. in the month of Nisan. Artaxerxes' reign started in 465 B.C. and in Babylonian times you wouldn't started counting until the 2nd year of the King's reign. So the 20th yr of his reign is 444 B.C. According to Jewish custom you would use the first part of the month so it would be Nisan 1, 444 B.C. Then 476 years and 25 days from that date is Nisan 10, 33 A.D. By the references made in the book of Luke and by examining Jewish calenders from that time period, Nisan 10, 33 A.D. is the exact day that Jesus rode into Jerasulem on a donkey.

This is an amazing prophecy!
 
Upvote 0

Cougar99

Newbie
Apr 13, 2012
10
0
✟22,623.00
Faith
Christian
Hey candle glow, I didn't know how to copy just a section of your post. I was referring to you original post when you said that King Artaxerxes' decree was 447 B.C. and that 476 yrs from that date was 30 A.D. The decree was in 444 B.C. so 476 years from that date is 33 A.D. I was just clarifying that, it wasn't anything really important.
 
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


I would like to think that you might kind of like my blog that I wrote a couple of years back in an attempt to get my atheistic friends to think more deeply regarding the implications of The Anthropic Principle, String Theory and even the Cyclic Model of the Universe?!?!

Dogmatic Atheists Lack Mathematical Aptitude.: Did God Evolve?
 
Upvote 0

DennisTate

Newbie
Site Supporter
Mar 31, 2012
10,742
1,665
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟424,894.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


Yes this is an amazing prophecy and sure does fit with an article written by a man in Uganda who is predicting an outpouring of the Holy Spirit when we Christians learn to support the Jewish people in the role that they need to play to se the stage for the era of Moshiach/Messiah!

This sounds like a truly good theory to me!!!!????

 
Upvote 0

Akiba021

Newbie
Jul 22, 2012
147
10
✟15,315.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I'm going to be completely honest and come right out and say that... For some reason I can't rightly explain.. I don't really think that just because the Bible says that prophecy was written then and never changed, that it actually was. The reality of things is that we can never know what really happened that far back. All power-holding organizations (Christianity included) have had their hand in changing history, and lying to the masses to make their stories seem more believable. The history classes in my state, for instance, are completely different than the ones they teach in Canada, and Europe, even when discussing the same topic. I know. I've spent enough time discussing it with people from other areas. Fact is, most history is a lie. I'm not saying this is for certain, because like you, I have no irrefutable proof. But it's just as likely to be a lie as is me telling you I have twelve foot forearms and eat toddlers.
 
Upvote 0

candle glow

whatever I want to be
Jan 2, 2012
2,035
181
Nairobi, Kenya
✟25,632.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm going to be completely honest and come right out and say that... For some reason I can't rightly explain.. I don't really think that just because the Bible says that prophecy was written then and never changed, that it actually was.

You may be right, akiba, but I don't think I was asking anyone to believe anything just because it's written in the Bible. I was asking for discussion/examination as to whether what is written there (in this particular case, a prophecy) had any merit at all.

I don't know if you read the study I posted, but therein was an actual mathematical formula which appeared to validate the prophecy.
 
Upvote 0

Akiba021

Newbie
Jul 22, 2012
147
10
✟15,315.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I did read your post. What I meant was simply that any number of elements in that formula could have been altered or doctored between it's origins and now. History is written by those who have power, not necessarily those who were there, or the most honest of folks. But like I said, neither of us were there, so I can't say one way or another. I apologize. I'm tired. I didn't mean to sound like a jerk. XD <3 Good theory, though. It definitely does hold some merit, at the very least. Keep this up. I'd like to see more of it.
 
Upvote 0

candle glow

whatever I want to be
Jan 2, 2012
2,035
181
Nairobi, Kenya
✟25,632.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I didn't think you were being a jerk; just a bit irrational. I fine to be challenged on my opinions etc... so I 'm not trying to run you off. It's true that information could have been tampered with, but it's also true that it may not have been tampered with. In such a situation we need to look at which is more likely, unless there is some kind of hard evidence either way.
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟95,346.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

There's actually some debate about whether Isaiah was written by one single person. The second part, in which Cyrus is discussed, is believed to have been written in the time of Cyrus. in fact, if you read isaiah 44 and 45, it doesn't read like he is predicting the eventual rise of one named Cyrus, but rather the elevation of someone already known, Cyrus the Great.
 
Upvote 0

candle glow

whatever I want to be
Jan 2, 2012
2,035
181
Nairobi, Kenya
✟25,632.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hi serious,

I'm a bit confused as to how you are relating what you've shared here to the prophecy I mentioned.

In the prophecy, Daniel talked about the Messiah being "cut off" regarding a particular number of years. There is even an actual mathematical equation involved.

Can you comment on that? Thanks.
 
Upvote 0