Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
data has shown that INTJs typically end up with INTJs. For the most part, opposites don't attract.
I've noticed that many INTJ's end up with SJ types. There are lot of SJ types out there... so that may explain it!
Oddly enough, I have two INTJ siblings. Neither of them married other INTJ's.
I know a couple that's the other way around... male is INTJ, and female is ISTJ. They seem very happy together.I know a couple who the female is INTJ and the male is ISTJ.
I am an INTJ. INTJ and INFJ are two of the three rarest of the personality types, so it is an unlikely matchup by shear numbers.
Nowadays, it seems that "inferential statistics" indicates an higher prevalence for each type, as found in Wikipedia. As I am not familiar with inferential statistics, I'm not sure how reliable that data is. Seems a little sketchy to me. Most, if not all, INTP web sites still say that we're only 1% of the population. Cursory examination of other IN-type sites reveals that they also claim to be 1% of the population. This is not surprising because all of the IN personality types were once said to be approximately 1% of the population. I have found that most of the older MBTI literature supports this.Based on my experiences with the test, I find that a lot of people tend to say they are INTJ, INFJ or the other "less than one percent" category, INFP. Do any of you find this seems to be the case as well?
Two reasons for this:Based on my experiences with the test, I find that a lot of people tend to say they are INTJ, INFJ or the other "less than one percent" category, INFP. Do any of you find this seems to be the case as well?
I'm also in the 1%... IN(T/F... only one point of difference on the last 3 times I've done the test!!)P category.Nowadays, it seems that "inferential statistics" indicates an higher prevalence for each type, as found in Wikipedia. As I am not familiar with inferential statistics, I'm not sure how reliable that data is. Seems a little sketchy to me. Most, if not all, INTP web sites still say that we're only 1% of the population. Cursory examination of other IN-type sites reveals that they also claim to be 1% of the population. This is not surprising because all of the IN personality types were once said to be approximately 1% of the population. I have found that most of the older MBTI literature supports this.
Personally, I've met many INTJ's, many INFP's, a good number of INFJ's, but no other INTP's. Either I find myself in situations that are more likely to attract those other types, in which case I may actually be one of those other types myself, or there are simply fewer INTP's than any other type. Not that I should rule out the possibility that dumb luck has effected my anecdotal evidence.
Two reasons for this:
1) Many of these online tests don't do a great job of categorizing people and tend to put people at extremes with few people in the middle categories.
2) Introverts spend much more time online, and are hence much more likely to fill out and online survey.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?