Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ah, Intelligent Design's Impact on Science. That explains it. No impact, so time to change the subject!
I'd be interested in who is citing this. Google Scholar only gives one citation, a book by Douglas Axe, another Discovery Institute guy. (My usual go-to source for citations, Web of Science, doesn't list the article at all.)40 of these citations were attributed to a single article (Model and Laboratory Demonstrations That Evolutionary Optimization Works Well Only If Preceded by Invention - 2015).
I'd be interested in who is citing this. Google Scholar only gives one citation, a book by Douglas Axe, another Discovery Institute guy. (My usual go-to source for citations, Web of Science, doesn't list the article at all.)
(BTW, for comparison, during the same period I've been an author on 38 research papers and 2 reviews, according to Web of Science. They've been cited 15,235 times.)
think about that: millions articles about evolution with zero evidence.
think about that: millions articles about evolution with zero evidence.
they are actually smart. their interpretation isnt.
they are actually smart. their interpretation isnt.
You just changed your comment substantially, from science, period, to various types.
Not to mention, that has nothing to do with opposing science itself, but the conclusions drawn using a process we refer to as science, however wrong or right.
You should step back and think about what you’re saying for a moment.
One thing I've learnt from creationists is the art of calculating probabilities based on "numbers I find convincing". Without showing my working, I claim the probability of xianghua never posting again is...... 0. I will even put my reputation on the line here and state that the probability of xianghua making the same erroneous claim as being 1/1And he was never heard from again...
There is however, one huge difference. Your predictions will most likely come true.One thing I've learnt from creationists is the art of calculating probabilities based on "numbers I find convincing". Without showing my working, I claim the probability of xianghua never posting again is...... 0. I will even put my reputation on the line here and state that the probability of xianghua making the same erroneous claim as being 1/1
See, I can use creation science to make predictions
Apparently you base your beliefs on nothing but imaginary robot penguins, with no actual lab or field work at all.sure. because they base their ideas on belief when im not. simple as that.
sure. because they base their ideas on belief when im not. simple as that.
who care? i talking about evidence. not belief.That's completely false.
But don't take my word for it. See what Creationist Todd Wood has to say on the subject: The truth about evolution
who care? i talking about evidence.
because i have read many of them. and every one of them was base on belief.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?