fated
The White Hart
REPOST, I think this was missed.
We are very sorry. And, while, it does not excuse the problem, it is important to note that the problem existed in other places as well, even if it may have been a bit worse within the Catholic Church, but, we may never know, because many places were it was also strong, are immune from prosecution or lack funds that make law suits worthwhile or compelling to file.
Further, diocese across the US, at least, now require a class, a background check, and fingerprints, in order to carry out an work for the Church with Children.
I am sorry that this itself will likely cause any miraculous assertions to be ineffective in this format. Perhaps seeing very ancient intact bodies or something, such as, you could visit Lourdes?
God did not create the universe from Himself, but from nothing.
That is hardly up to me.
Well, within the context of the rest of what I wrote, I don't think I indicated an impersonal God, even the use of the word 'prophetic' seems to indicate a personal God. This is different from the usual tactic of questioning whether the prophetic nature of Humanae Vitae merely derives from correlation, rather than the causation, due to Natural Law, that the document asserts. Sometimes the degradation of society (such as the increase an divorce and STDs) is simply disregarded, but normally, the cause of these changes is just questioned.
I don't think that disbelieving gravity in general because someone might define it in some what that is incorrect is a reasonable approach.
Because, God, being a personal Being, visited history in a concrete way, to teach mankind about Himself, and also to save them.
Are any of these others old enough to even be considered to be alongside the existing books? Not in most cases. The best answer I get here is usually fudging numbers toward each other. Besides, the Traditions of the Catholic Church (and the Eastern Orthodox) are passed down by bishops, in an unbroken procession from the time of Christ. These are those with exceptional authority to express the reality of God visiting history.
I assume this regards the assertion involving an understanding of humanity, rather than a defining of God.
In all fairness, I don't think Ignosticism, as defined is a reasonable way to approach the existence of a Creator.
Christian believe that knowing God, as a person, is the objective, and not defining Him. This makes more sense, even from a human perspective, as we rarely fully define anything, much less a complex thought or issue, how much less can we reasonably be expected to define God? Christians seek to know God, even if fully defining Him is impossible.
I'm not sure Zeus mythology is old enough to lead Judaism, it seems more likely the Zeus mythology was taken from Judaism or arose independently or perhaps by some strange prophetic means.
To die from seeing God is hardly surprising even if it takes a while to accomplish this, being smitten, or smote, by God.
I think those interpretations of prophecy do not fit in with the rest of the work. And hardly constitute a contradiction.
It seems not so much flaws or contradictions in logic, but a rejection of something much greater than man, that is difficult for man to understand, much less define, that is causing the trouble. Even asserting that God is unable to make contradictions, or that part of Divine Revelation and theology is understanding the exception of the contradiction or perhaps the contradiction can be described in some other way, possibly that agnostics do not see as important.
We are very sorry. And, while, it does not excuse the problem, it is important to note that the problem existed in other places as well, even if it may have been a bit worse within the Catholic Church, but, we may never know, because many places were it was also strong, are immune from prosecution or lack funds that make law suits worthwhile or compelling to file.
Further, diocese across the US, at least, now require a class, a background check, and fingerprints, in order to carry out an work for the Church with Children.
I am sorry that this itself will likely cause any miraculous assertions to be ineffective in this format. Perhaps seeing very ancient intact bodies or something, such as, you could visit Lourdes?
God did not create the universe from Himself, but from nothing.
That is hardly up to me.
Well, within the context of the rest of what I wrote, I don't think I indicated an impersonal God, even the use of the word 'prophetic' seems to indicate a personal God. This is different from the usual tactic of questioning whether the prophetic nature of Humanae Vitae merely derives from correlation, rather than the causation, due to Natural Law, that the document asserts. Sometimes the degradation of society (such as the increase an divorce and STDs) is simply disregarded, but normally, the cause of these changes is just questioned.
I don't think that disbelieving gravity in general because someone might define it in some what that is incorrect is a reasonable approach.
Because, God, being a personal Being, visited history in a concrete way, to teach mankind about Himself, and also to save them.
Are any of these others old enough to even be considered to be alongside the existing books? Not in most cases. The best answer I get here is usually fudging numbers toward each other. Besides, the Traditions of the Catholic Church (and the Eastern Orthodox) are passed down by bishops, in an unbroken procession from the time of Christ. These are those with exceptional authority to express the reality of God visiting history.
I assume this regards the assertion involving an understanding of humanity, rather than a defining of God.
In all fairness, I don't think Ignosticism, as defined is a reasonable way to approach the existence of a Creator.
Christian believe that knowing God, as a person, is the objective, and not defining Him. This makes more sense, even from a human perspective, as we rarely fully define anything, much less a complex thought or issue, how much less can we reasonably be expected to define God? Christians seek to know God, even if fully defining Him is impossible.
I'm not sure Zeus mythology is old enough to lead Judaism, it seems more likely the Zeus mythology was taken from Judaism or arose independently or perhaps by some strange prophetic means.
To die from seeing God is hardly surprising even if it takes a while to accomplish this, being smitten, or smote, by God.
I think those interpretations of prophecy do not fit in with the rest of the work. And hardly constitute a contradiction.
It seems not so much flaws or contradictions in logic, but a rejection of something much greater than man, that is difficult for man to understand, much less define, that is causing the trouble. Even asserting that God is unable to make contradictions, or that part of Divine Revelation and theology is understanding the exception of the contradiction or perhaps the contradiction can be described in some other way, possibly that agnostics do not see as important.
Upvote
0