• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

If you don't change...

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
...we won't let you fellowship with us.

Go ahead. I'll fellowship with other people.

...we won't let you come to our church.


Go ahead. I wasn't planning on attending your church. (I prefer churches in my own denomination; and if ELCA churches aren't available in a place where I'm visiting, I'll attend Episcopal or Catholic services, instead.)

...we won't let you commune with us.

I commune only in churches which believe that the elements of bread and wine become the actual Body and Blood of Christ. If your church doesn't teach that, I won't commune with you.

...you're not going to go to Heaven.

You don't get to make that decision: God does.

...you're going to burn in Hell.

You don't get to make that decision: God does.

Also, I lay claim to Romans 8:28-39:

And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. 29 For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. 30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified. 31 What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? 32 He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? 33 Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies. 34 Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised—who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us. 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? 36 As it is written, For your sake we are being killed all the day long; we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.
37 No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38 For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.

...we'll say you're not a Christian.

Go ahead. Just because someone calls me a door doesn't make me a door.

...we'll say you're possessed by a demon.


Well, you may have one there: I'm diabetic and I'm more than sick of giving myself insulin shots and pricking my fingers all time. When someone figures out how to cure diabetes I'll be more than happy to have that monkey off my back.

...we'll say you lead a sinful lifestyle.

We all lead a "sinful lifestyle" -- each and every single day of our lives. We are all saint and sinner alike. We will all sin in some way from now until one second after we're dead and we've left this life. The fact that you're a heterosexual doesn't make you any less a sinner than I, nor does it make you any more sanctified or justified before God. You and I will sin today (probably within the next hour!), and tomorrow, and the next day, and every single day until we die. If we weren't sinners incapable of keeping the Law, we wouldn't have needed a Savior; and we all work out our salvation each and every single day.

...we'll say you're an atheist and a non-believer.

A person who believes in God is, by definition, not an atheist or a non-believer. Furthermore, I'm not beholden to what you think or what you say. Just because you call me a chair does not make me a chair.

...we won't associate with you.

Go ahead: make my day. I can live with that -- quite happily, in fact!

...we won't let you play any of our reindeer games.

Then I'll go play reindeer games with someone else.

...we'll make your life miserable on Christian Forums.

You might want to keep the CF Terms of Service, posted here, in mind:


2.1 No Flaming

Members should not insult another member with a personal attack. Such behavior would include personally defamatory comments or inflammatory accusations, even if they are believed to be true. Categorically stating that somebody is destined for hell is also considered to be flaming.

This does not mean that criticizing another person's beliefs is the same as flaming. For instance, saying an idea is non-bliblical is not the same as saying that a member is non-Christian or follows non-biblical beliefs.

As a general rule, when in doubt, assume good faith on the part of the other poster.


2.2 No Harassment of Other Members

A member should not go out of their way to make another member's CF experience miserable.



2.3. Congregational Areas Will Have Their Own Rules for Debating

The members of the Congregational fora will be empowered to elect their own moderators and establish their own rules for who may debate in them. In essence, they will remain safe-havens for members of the Congregation.

This does not mean that Congregational fora are allowed to make rules that conflict with the CF rules.



2.4 No Defamation of Other Members

You shall not make posts about other members that are not true. This includes slander of another member or misrepresentations about another person's faith. If a post is found or shown to be untrue, it should be retracted with apology.


And by the way: I can press the [REPORT] button, too.

Any questions, or any parts of this post which are unclear?



 

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ummm Uber. Why you making statements and responding to them as though someone else made them???

You okay?

Think of this as being similar in format to Luther's Small Catechism:

[Statement]

What does this mean?
[Explanation]

[Statement]

What does this mean?
[Explanation]

etc.
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Think of this as being similar in format to Luther's Small Catechism:

[Statement]

What does this mean? [Explanation]

[Statement]

What does this mean? [Explanation]

etc.

Yeah but Luther used logic and a good hermanutic, you threw that out the window.
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It's part of his pro-gay propaganda, let him be.

Are you sure?

I thought it was part of my
godlessatheisticcommiepinkosocialistdemoncraticlieberalalquedasupportingbushhatingcheneybashing
republicanbashingconservativebaitingevilutionistfeminazigaymarriagesupportingenvironmentalwacko
secularhumanistnationaleducationassociationsupportingprounionchristianbashingfundiehatingproscience
proeuropeaninsurgencysupportingirancoddlingvegeterianpropacifisthumveehatingprobreastfeedingantiamerican
globalwarmingsupportingeconomywreckingproincreasingtheminimumwagecoddlingillegalimmigrantshippieloveifitfeelsgooddoiteverythingisrelative
progaganda...
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yeah but Luther used logic and a good hermanutic.

Then I suggest you might want to start reading (and studying for comprehension) the works of Martin Luther.

When you get through with that, take a look at Calvin's Institutes of Religion. Fascinating reading: Calvin's ideas on predestination are so very much different than the right-wing, nationalistic legalism which all too often is presented today as modern Calvinism.
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private

Actually I read both of those works, so what exactly is your point? If Luther saw what you say on this forum he would be the first one to condem you. Calvin would be worse. You should feel like that I'm not as "legalistic" as they both were.
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Actually I read both of those works, so what exactly is your point? If Luther saw what you say on this forum he would be the first one to condem you. Calvin would be worse. You should feel like that I'm not as "legalistic" as they both were.

You may have "read" these works, but did you comprehend them?

I ask this because you've mis-stated several things I've posted within this (and other) forums, which indicated there was a problem with comprehension.

I was concerned that if you were having problems comprehending what was stated in CF posts, you might also have problems with more complex works by Luther and Calvin.

I'm merely expressing concern that you will be able to read these rather difficult treatises by major Christian theologians with understanding and comprehension.
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Another ironic post by Uber...

Sorry Ubie, I catch you in your contradictions and expose them that doesn't mean I don't have exegetical skills.
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Another ironic post by Uber...

Do you know what "irony" means, NewGuy101?

ironic |īˈränik| adjective using or characterized by irony : his mouth curved into an ironic smile. • happening in the opposite way to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this : [with clause ] it was ironic that now that everybody had plenty of money for food, they couldn't obtain it because everything was rationed.

Somehow, I don't think this is the word you want.
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Another ironic post by Uber...

Sorry Ubie, I catch you in your contradictions and expose them that doesn't mean I don't have exegetical skills.

Well, you haven't caught me in any contradictions -- but you have made several posts stating that I said things which I didn't say at all.

I think Scripture calls that "bearing false witness". I believe there's a reference to it in Exodus 20. God seems to have a real problem with people who bear "false witness" -- especially since "bear false witness" is mentioned five times in Scripture, "false witness" is mentioned 17 times, and "liar" and "liars" are mentioned 18 times -- though I'm sure it's nothing like the problem He has with gay people.

(The last clause of my last sentence is an example of an ironic statement.)
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Sure do? Do you? I mean anyone can post a dictionary definition like you do but hermanutics is another issue.
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Oh nice, more manipulation of scripture. Niiiice.
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Oh nice, more manipulation of scripture. Niiiice.

Nope. I did five searches: one each for "false witness" "bear false witness", "liar", and "liars", and then stated the number of results.

You do know the different between "searching on terms" or "searching on strings" and "manipulation of Scripture", don't you?
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
Actually like your troubles with hermanutics with scripture you have problems understanding me. I see that you will take scripture and it's timeless absolute truth and apply it to the WRONG context. But hey who cares the bible is wrong according to you in the first place...LOL
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I have problems understanding you because you frequently use words in incorrect ways ("irony" is one example); you take peoples' words out of context and then mis-state and mis-quote them; and you seem to have developed a strange view of Scripture which allows you to exonerate yourself for anything you've ever done, are doing or ever will do (including some pretty vile behavior in the present) while using Scripture to condemn everybody else without mercy.

Frankly, the way you use language and Scripture makes it very difficult for me to take anything you say seriously. I'm sorry, but what you present as yourself to us is just not believable. Annoying and irritating: yes. Believable? No.
 
Upvote 0