E
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am interested in reading some peoples thoughts and views not only on death, but what they believe happens after death.
Your brain dies, you go into the ground, that's it.
No evidence that anything more happens than that.
^This.
In addition, life goes on without you.
When we die, our bodies stop metabolising and brain function stops.There are sundry views as to man's ultimate destiny when he dies. The question has been a very intriguing question and has occupied much of human thought for many centuries. Great philosophical minds have tried to wrap their minds around the idea of death and come up with some ideas about its implications. All people at one time or another have thought about this and admit to its inevitability. Death, it has been said, is the great equalizer of us all.
I am interested in reading some peoples thoughts and views not only on death, but what they believe happens after death.
Even though a convicted murder who repents is granted etenal bliss in heaven with no punishment (save his slow, agonising death on a cross of course).My choice is to believe what Jesus Christ says about life after death, namely that Christ will judge all people of all nations, with the righteous receiving everlasting life, and the unrighteous destruction. I do not believe that the unrighteous suffer for an eternal length of time, as I've seen careful analysis by good scholars that concluded that the Gospels do not support that.
It doesn't have to be blind faith, as you are taking the Gospels as an actual factual account of what happened.Some will no doubt feel that I am exercising blind faith, and therefore irrational and superstitious. My response is that Jesus has a body of teachings, some of which can be verified and some of which cannot. Teachings such as the command to love one's fellow humans including enemies, to remain morally pure, to turn aside from money, to repay evil with good, and so forth, I can verify and have found to be absolutely reliable. Because Jesus is absolutely reliable on topics that I can verify, I trust Him on things that I can't verify, including eternal life.
Why would they live on?In order that I may more clearly understand your position, you are asserting that life and all it entails i.e. consciousness, feeling, thought, emotion etc. etc. are no longer in existence when the brain dies?
I see from the posts that the majority of atheists/humanists/naturalists generally agree that death is the "end" or the cessation of all life. Kind of like the end of a book if you will.
It gathers from the above view, that one's main purpose while they are alive would simply be the pursuit of life, liberty, prosperity and happiness. Is this generally how you all feel?
Yes, just like the end of a book. Death is the end to the epic adventure that is your life.
I don't know how you gather that from the finality of death, but it sounds good to me.
I aim at my personal flourishing, and describing that as "life, liberty, prosperity, and happiness" is reasonably accurate. My life as a human being is a self-contained end-in-itself for me, not merely a means or preliminary to some afterlife.
eudaimonia,
Mark
If death is the final end, if there is no judgment or time for accounting of the things that one has done in this life, then it stands to reason that one should try to live life to the fullest does it not?
The whole idea of: "hey, whatever floats your boat, do what you feel" kind of attituide would flourish under this view.
The idea of: "eat and drink, for tomorrow we die" mentality would obviously be more desirable right?
If there is nothing, and if there is no ultimate meaning, then a strong case could be made for saying: "to each his own", right?
I am judged every single moment of my life by the law of causality. Actions -- even thoughts -- have consequences. Think of it as natural karma. I am more fully accountable than Christians are, since they only worry about what will happen to them on Judgment Day. Every day is Judgement Day for me.
So, when I speak of living life to the fullest, that doesn't mean some silly shallow hedonism. I mean wise and virtuous living that provides a solid foundation for my well-being. I am an advocate of virtue ethics.
Not for me. Doing whatever you feel like is irrational.
No, that would be immensely short-sighted and unwise.
You are way off base. My life has plenty of meaning. It just doesn't have "divine" meaning.
eudaimonia,
Mark
But a case could be made for having that attitude though, right?
I mean you have your idea of what a virtuous life is like and endeavor to live it. Others may have their idea of what a life to the fullest would be. Others may think like you, others may not. Would you agree?
A case can be made for anything at all. I'm not sure why I should care about that. I only care about what is true of reality.
Some people are Christians, others are Hindu, others are Muslims, etc. News at Eleven.
eudaimonia,
Mark
You say you only care about what is true of reality. The reality of it is that in the end, according to you, there is nothing.
No hope
no reward after death for having lived a virtuous life
no expectation of judgment.
Nothingness and meaningless is the lot of all. For all die.
For you, living a "virtuous" life, (this must remain completely subjective and open to interpretation by each person by the way) brings you fulfillment. For others living a hedonistic lifestyle would be their choice.
If death is the final end, if there is no judgment or time for accounting of the things that one has done in this life, then it stands to reason that one should try to live life to the fullest does it not? It seems you agree with me, no? The whole idea of: "hey, whatever floats your boat, do what you feel" kind of attituide would flourish under this view. The idea of: "eat and drink, for tomorrow we die" mentality would obviously be more desirable right? If there is nothing, and if there is no ultimate meaning, then a strong case could be made for saying: "to each his own", right?
No hope for what? I have many hopes.
But there are rewards during life for living a virtuous life. Why should I care about rewards after death?
I've already explained to you that every day is a day of judgment for me. I'm not missing out on anything.
When they are dead, they won't be ghosts crying "Boo hoo! My non-existence has no meaning!" So you are referring to a complete non-issue.
For you, religion must remain completely subjective and open to interpretation by each person, and that brings the religious person his or her fulfillment. Many theists smuggle in a great deal of hedonism into their lifestyle, which is their choice.
This isn't rocket science. Before you make such claims, ask if they can apply to other groups, including your own.
I will just correct you on one thing. While we all must interpret reality for ourselves, if we are concerned with understanding reality for what it is, that doesn't mean that "anything goes" as far as belief. It is possible to doublecheck one's facts, to examine an issue from different angles, to look to one's life experience and the experiences of others, to consult the wise, etc. And it is the reality of human nature that determines if people flourish or not, so "fulfillment" is not as subjective as you might think.
But you have no hope after you die.
Hey, look at that, the guy who keeps telling atheists what to believe can dish it out but can't take it.You are writing a lot but saying very little im afraid. Who are you to tell me what reality is? You must speak for yourself sir, and not for anyone else.
No-one is asking you to bow to them.You may decide to live by consulting "wise men" and looking at life from "different angles", you have the right to do so, but as a mere man who is nothing more, nor nothing less than I am, you cannot pass judgment on me for living according to way I see the world. I am speaking as one who rejects the belief in any gods or any supernatural force that would impose his arbitray will upon me. I am a free-thinker, an elightened man. I will not bow to the idea of a moral god or gods let alone a mere man such as yourself!
You know the whole atheists-with-morals-are-being-inconsistent garbage you came up with last thread, that you still haven't apologised for?
This atheists-should-be-hedonists crap is along the same lines.
Again, I strongly advise you to try another line.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?