Why are you obsessed with the fact Mueller did not explicitly allege Trump committed the crime of obstruction/attempted obstruction? Have you actually persuaded yourself to think Mueller expressing an opinion necessarily means the opinion he has expressed is right? Do you not realize and understand that Mueller alleging a crime is an opinion? That Mueller would be engaged in making and expressing an opinion, like EVERYONE else? Welcome to humanity Mueller, you have an opinion like the rest of us, and for a moment it was rumored you might be a deity, given the amount of deference RJ is giving to you.
Do you have a guess as to what would be needed to evaluate the strength of Mueller’s opinion, should he had expressed one of guilt? Any notion as to what would be desirable to assess the veracity of Mueller’s opinion of guilt.
Evidence!
The evidence allows one to know, without Mueller’s opinion of guilt. A defining feature of evidence is to facilitate in the discovery of knowledge, and to reveal knowledge. Who knew?
Einstein was of the opinion that gravity warps space fabric, thereby bending light and warping time. How exactly did anyone come to know Einstein was right? Evidence. The closer one gets to the center of an object warping space fabric, the more slowly time moves. How is this known to be true? Evidence.
You do realize 12 jurors voting for guilt are expressing their opinion the evidence supports guilt? Guess what determines whether their opinion is strong and true to some very high degree of probability? Evidence.
The evidence here, and it’s strenth and weaknesses, along with the rational inferences made from the evidence, and the strength of logical arguments made based on and relying upon the evidence, allows one to “know” whether Trump committed a crime to varying degrees of confidence.
Your entire argument ignores the concept of evidence, and labors under the false pretense that knowing isn’t possible without some official declaration by some official or jury.