Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If we live our whole life in sin, we are not obeying God.I have to disagree. We can have an inclination towards obeying and yet live our whole life in sin. Why? Because of libertarian free will.
Also our inclinations change if we choose living in sin. Our heart hardens and our inclination becomes more and more towards sin.
Some call it that. . .but I got it solely from Paul in the NT.We're all over the place and this takes a lot of time.
Let me ask you this:
Are you reformed in your theology?
Agreed. . .but before we are born again, we cannot obey (Romans 8:7-8; 1 Corinthians 2:14).I'd like to get away from repeating that I agree that having free will does not imply obedience.
Just that, once we are born again, we are free to obey or not to obey.
Hi Clare,Some call it that. . .but I got it solely from Paul in the NT.
Agreed. . .but before we are born again, we cannot obey (Romans 8:7-8; 1 Corinthians 2:14).
And after we are born again, we can obey.
It is regeneration, not free will, which gives us the power to obey what we could not obey before.
And then it is the power of God (Philippians 2:13) which keeps us from falling into fatal sin, and
the Holy Spirit is given to us as a deposit (down payment) to guarantee the completion of our co-inheritance with Christ (2 Corinthians 1:22, 2 Corinthians 5:5; Ephesians 1:14), just as the down payment (deposit) on a house guarantees the completion of its purchase.
Scripture never presents the issue as "free will". . .that is an invention of man.
Scripture always presents the issue as regeneration (Romans 8:7-8; 1 Corinthians 2:14; John 3:3-5).
Free will is simply choosing what one prefers, and the unregenerate prefer sin.
It requires regeneration, not free will, to change what one prefers and, therefore, what one then freely chooses.
Obedience is about regeneration, not about free will.
Being born again is objective.
You either are or you are not.
Of course you are right that the new birth is an objective reality. I had the wrong understanding of words subjective and objective.
But isn't it both?
If a blind man gets his sight back, it's an objective truth, but what he sees with his new eyes isn't that subjective?
*Edited
Yes, I believe many are fooling themselves. Possibly even I.
If we live our whole life in sin, we are not obeying God.
If we are not obeying God (to the best of our ability) we cannot call ourselves disciples of Jesus.
John 3:36
36And anyone who believes in God’s Son has eternal life. Anyone who doesn’t obey the Son will never experience eternal life but remains under God’s angry judgment.”
In theology we use the term FREE WILL which is related to moral decisions.
We use the term FREE because there are some areas of theology which state that our will is not truly free, but is dependent on an outside source, or, actually, on coercion from this outside force.
Where is the inaccuracy?
Exactly.
In the reformed faith, it is GOD that chooses who will have eternal life and who will be damned.
For whatever reason - we are not informed as to what the decision is based on.
The person, either chosen or not chosen, has no say in the decision.
Correct. In Calvinism God planned what each person will choose at each moment of his life.
As Piper has stated, even the specks of dust in the air are controlled by God.
This type of choosing on our part is certainly mocking TO US.
It's called compatibilist free will.
It is not true free will, but man is made to choose according to what God wills.
Choosing according to our inclinations is a sweet way of saying it.
But it's not so sweet to man since his true free will has been eradicated by a God that chooses everything for him.
I don't believe what I do because of Calvinism. Calvinism just closely resembles what I believe. But show me the incongruities.It would be nice to clear up whether or not you adhere to all the beliefs of calvinism,
or if you just pick and choose which ones you like and then expect others to know your choices.
Jacob Arminius was born in the 1,500's.
I don't know anything about him.
I believe in normal Christianity which began soon after Jesus resurrected.
And yes, if we can choose between option A or option B that means we have free will.
Spoken to the people of God in whom the Holy Spirit would work.See Deuteronomy 30:19
19“Today I have given you the choice between life and death, between blessings and curses. Now I call on heaven and earth to witness the choice you make. Oh, that you would choose life, so that you and your descendants might live!
As you can see a free will choice is not an assumption, but what the entire bible teaches.
Are we robots, or are we human?
God created us in His image.
God has will that is free.
He gifted this to us also.
Nowhere in the OT or the NT did we lose this gift of the freedom to choose between 2 options -
moral options, salvation options.
No. The ability to freely choose does NOT imply the ability to obey.
Two different topics.
Agreed.
We are the slaves to whom we present ourselves.
Romans 6:16
16Don’t you realize that you become the slave of whatever you choose to obey? You can be a slave to sin, which leads to death, or you can choose to obey God, which leads to righteous living.
Again, notice that we are given the free will choice to choose.
The ability to choose denotes a will that is truly free.
As to your quote of Matthew 7:23 I do appreciate that you posted WHY Jesus is telling some to depart from Him...they were workers of iniquity. Some forget to leave out this part.
The above is not understandable to me. Sorry.
First you say the choice is up to us.
Then you say we are unable to choose.
The inability to be unable to choose is calvinistic.
If someone states they have chosen Christ, then they have chosen Christ and hopefully they will live for Christ and be sincere.
Indeed, and as in the analogy above:Hi Clare,
Too late, will have to go till tomorrow.
A deposit is good, but we do have to keep making those mortgage payments!
Tomorrow...
Jacob Arminius was born in the 1,500's.
I don't know anything about him.
I believe in normal Christianity which began soon after Jesus resurrected.
And yes, if we can choose between option A or option B that means we have free will.
See
Deuteronomy 30:19
19“Today I have given you the choice between life and death, between blessings and curses. Now I call on heaven and earth to witness the choice you make. Oh, that you would choose life, so that you and your descendants might live!
As you can see a free will choice is not an assumption, but what the entire bible teaches.
Are we robots, or are we human?
God created us in His image.
God has will that is free.
He gifted this to us also.
Nowhere in the OT or the NT did we lose this gift of the freedom to choose between 2 options -
moral options, salvation options.
No. The ability to freely choose does NOT imply the ability to obey.
Two different topics.
Agreed.
We are the slaves to whom we present ourselves.
Romans 6:16
16Don’t you realize that you become the slave of whatever you choose to obey? You can be a slave to sin, which leads to death, or you can choose to obey God, which leads to righteous living.
Again, notice that we are given the free will choice to choose.
The ability to choose denotes a will that is truly free.
As to your quote of Matthew 7:23 I do appreciate that you posted WHY Jesus is telling some to depart from Him...they were workers of iniquity. Some forget to leave out this part.
The above is not understandable to me. Sorry.
First you say the choice is up to us.
Then you say we are unable to choose.
The inability to be unable to choose is calvinistic.
If someone states they have chosen Christ, then they have chosen Christ and hopefully they will live for Christ and be sincere.
True that! In fact, believing for the sake of believing, buttressing up the theory, is what I did for years, before I realized I was, even after "giving my heart" many times, (since each time my heart condemned me later), fully at the mercy of God to do as he pleased with me (—a much safer place to be than under the results of any act of my will in "giving my heart" to God).I think that is sad! There never was a question or shadow of a doubt to me about my new birth, but sometimes I wonder if I'm still saved. If I believed in perserverance of the saints, I guess I wouldn't question it, but you can't believe something for the sake of believing, can you?
I don't know how many steps are needed to accept a horrific doctine that defiles God's character by asserting that God decrees many from birth to a future of eternal horrific suffering in order to give himeself glory (read quote Calvin's quote below). Fortunately, Paul contradicts that docrine per 1 Timothy 2:4 which says that God desires all men be saved. Upon reading the surrounding verses the meaning of 1 Timothy 2:4 it is very plain to everyone but the most indoctrinated that God does indeed desire all to be saved. God's desire does not mean all men are saved because God has given men free will (refer to parable of the Wedding feast) as men can reject God (John 15:23). If you cannot accept 1 Timothy 2:4 at face value, there are those who have a TULIP they will sell you.
“…individuals are born, who are doomed from the womb to certain death, and are to glorify him by their destruction.” (John Calvin,Institutes of Christian Religion, Book 3, Chapter 23, Paragraph 6)
True that! In fact, believing for the sake of believing, buttressing up the theory, is what I did for years, before I realized I was, even after "giving my heart" many times, (since each time my heart condemned me later), fully at the mercy of God to do as he pleased with me (—a much safer place to be than under the results of any act of my will in "giving my heart" to God).
But if it's of any comfort or of any use to you, take a look at your words there: "still saved". From what were you saved —from the Lake of Fire? Who saved you? Did he make a mistake, and change his mind? Or did he plan to take you to be with him in Heaven? What makes you think you can change anything God has ordained?
True that! In fact, believing for the sake of believing, buttressing up the theory, is what I did for years, before I realized I was, even after "giving my heart" many times, (since each time my heart condemned me later), fully at the mercy of God to do as he pleased with me (—a much safer place to be than under the results of any act of my will in "giving my heart" to God).
But if it's of any comfort or of any use to you, take a look at your words there: "still saved". From what were you saved —from the Lake of Fire? Who saved you? Did he make a mistake, and change his mind? Or did he plan to take you to be with him in Heaven? What makes you think you can change anything God has ordained?
They are one and the same. I have no hope but in Christ.I hope I'm not out of my line here, but from all our conversations one thing struck me. It sounds like you put your hope in God's decree rather than in Christ for your salvation. If that is the case it is no good. I hope I'm wrong though. Our hope must always be in Christ, not in God's decree.
Good question Z,"Best of our ability?" This can put an enormous pressure on a person since you can always do more. Of course I agree we are to obey. But to the best of our ability is very subjectice. Some are never doing any evangelizing or giving to the poor and still thinking they do their best to obey God. Another person is evangelizing on the street every day and giving half his income to the poor, yet feels he isn't doing enough to obey God. So how do we know that we obey God with the best of our ability?
Well said.David Bercot put it in a way I like. He said we are to live in a love, faith, obedience relationship with Christ. It's like all these parts fit together. It's a relationship with Christ, with all the things that comes in a relationship. But we are to be good servants, not like the ones not getting anything ready for the bridegroom.
Agreed.Btw, of course if we are living in sin we are not obeying God. What I wrote to Mark was that you can have an inclination towards obedience and still live your whole life in sin. I didn't say that person won't come under judgement, if you think I meant that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?