• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How do we explain Neanderthals?

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,145
41
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟79,442.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
Exactly. Did he comment based on the mythical context of biblical history, or based on what we know about human origins through scientific discovery?

i notice you've discounted beforehand the working of grace. either myth or science -- no other options spring to mind?
 
Upvote 0

stavros388

Newbie
Oct 25, 2013
67
30
BC
✟30,093.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
i notice you've discounted beforehand the working of grace. either myth or science -- no other options spring to mind?
When and where did I discount the working of grace? We were talking about neanderthals and biological evolution, both of which fall into the domain of science.
 
Reactions: gzt
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married

*bolding in quote above is mine

From talkorigins:
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
As much as I adore St. Paisios, he didn't spend much time at dig sites or in science classes, so I prefer to acknowledge him as a sure guide to rooting the passions out of the human heart but not for piecing ancient bones or human history together.

Well said.
 
Upvote 0

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,145
41
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟79,442.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
Sorry, I don't follow.
you said: "As much as I adore St. Paisios, he didn't spend much time at dig sites or in science classes" ... but since he wasn't claiming to be a scientist or to make scientific statements, what difference does his lack of experience with science make?

to be more specific, he emphatically stated that the notion that the Theotokos, and therefore Christ, descended from lower lifeforms is blasphemous. can we contend that some time at a dig with Teilhard de Chardin would have given him a better working definition of blasphemy?
 
Upvote 0

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,145
41
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟79,442.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
When and where did I discount the working of grace? We were talking about neanderthals and biological evolution, both of which fall into the domain of science.

well you we were speaking specifically about what St. Paisios had to say about it, and you laid it out as either commenting based on mythical Biblical history or science. perhaps St. Paisios commented on Scripture neither from mythical history nor from science.
 
Upvote 0

stavros388

Newbie
Oct 25, 2013
67
30
BC
✟30,093.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If what he emphatically states as fact contradicts what we know about the world, I cannot accept it 'as fact'. No human, saint or otherwise, need be deemed infallible about all things at all times.
 
Upvote 0

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,145
41
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟79,442.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
If what he emphatically states as fact contradicts what we know about the world, I cannot accept it 'as fact'. No human, saint or otherwise, need be deemed infallible about all things at all times.

are you contending that St. Pasios is not qualified to discern what is and isn't blasphemy?
 
Upvote 0

jckstraw72

Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
Dec 9, 2005
10,160
1,145
41
South Canaan, PA
Visit site
✟79,442.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Republican
Our beliefs, whatever they may be, should conform to reality. If they do not, then at some level they are doing us harm.

of course. the question is - who is properly interpreting reality? science can study the external appearances and workings, while saints study the inner principles of all things, rooted in the mind of God from before all eternity.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 15, 2008
19,476
7,486
Central California
✟292,925.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
St. Paisios isn't the only incompatibalist Orthodox saint with regard to evolution. St. Theophan the Recluse and others condemn it in quite clear terms.

You won't find an Orthodox saint teaching against gravity or denying the existence of molecules or elements. You won't find them denying photosynthesis or plate tectonics. What you will find is plenty of them denying evolution, which is an unobservable theory.

The problems with evolution are manifold. I think we need to keep in mind the secular implications and pagan conclusions linked to the theory. The ideas of evolution come from atheists, and atheists have an agenda. They always do. And lets not forget those implications. If man is just a glorified animal, then why have monogamy? Animals impregnate multiple females, so why isn't the same ok for us? We men feel the instinct and temptation to stray, so maybe that's a good thing we animal humans should do? Why resist? In nature some animals have homosexual relations, so why not with us? Hitler used evolution to justify the strong wiping out the weak---the law of the jungle. Might makes right. Eugenics came out of the wake of evolution. Why not try to get rid of certain ethnic groups and "undesirables?" Why not make a super being like Hitler wanted? A "Kahn" or a "Kwisatz Hadderach" kind of thing?

There is no morality in evolution. It is simple survival, adaptability, and it is humanism at its core. Where is prayer in evolution? Where is grace? Where is the Fall? Where is a God that created humanity to live and not die? Where is justice and goodness? Did primates have to just club each other to death for millions of years until they developed into homo sapiens to finally learn love and mercy? In evolution humans are just more highly-developed animals, soulless and selfish. It also points to a God that can't just create, but must rather waste millenia with simple animals ascending steadily and slowly.

I can't fathom how an Orthodox Christian can marry the atheist-driven, soulless, selfish, un-Patristic, un-Biblical, modernist, humanist, sketchy philosophy of Evolution with Holy Orthodoxy. It's just not doable in my humble opinion.
 
Upvote 0

Cappadocious

Well-Known Member
Sep 29, 2012
3,885
860
✟38,161.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Well, Capp...You think it matters that we affirm modern science and deny that it could ever contradict Holy Tradition
It's really hard to maintain a charitable spirit if we are trivializing those Orthodox we really disagree with.
 
Reactions: gzt
Upvote 0

stavros388

Newbie
Oct 25, 2013
67
30
BC
✟30,093.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The way I see it, there are really only three ways to approach this challenging situation. The first is to be naturally in a position of ignorance. I hate to be so blunt but many church fathers and even saints were, and perhaps even now to a lesser degree, are ignorant of what science and the plentifully available evidence have to show us about human origins. To them there never was a challenge as they were raised in and their views fostered by a Christian culture that simply had no insight into evolution and therefore suffered no cognitive dissonance whatsoever. This is a 'luxury' many modern Christians do not have anymore.

The second way to deal with these things is through a kind of wilfull ignorance, often involving a dismissal of scientific discovery in this domain of knowledge altogether. This way is untenable or undesirable for many modern Christians. This is perhaps the most dangerous position to take regarding one's faith because, well, one can't deny or hide from the facts forever.

The third way, I would suggest, is one that takes into account the best (and worst) of both science and religion, holds tentatively to both to make room for future discovery, and pursues a Christian life that is experiential, practical, and ultimately and hopefully transformative. The inner subjective world IS different than the outer world best examined through science and natural history. NOMA as outlined by biologist Stephen J. Gould offers a kind of solution here. But if one's entire faith is based on the second way, that of denial or wilful ignorance employed in order to protect an ancient worldview, I fear that if something gives, they may be prone to outright atheism when their faith collapses under the weight of scientific evidence.

Many Christians, Orthodox and otherwise, hold to the third way (or something akin to it) and manage (in my case, this has admittedly been with some difficulty) to acknowledge the findings of science while still trying to discover and manifest in one's life those things that are perhaps most essential to being a Christian.

This is my view, for what it's worth. I see that other thoughtful people have their own ways of doing and seeing things.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

stavros388

Newbie
Oct 25, 2013
67
30
BC
✟30,093.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The idea that evolution comes from atheists is patently false. Why, Charles Darwin himself was a Christian!

Believing that evolution happens does not immediately imply that we should apply the law of the jungle to our societies. Even biologist and atheist Richard Dawkins admits this would be a terrible idea.
 
Upvote 0

stavros388

Newbie
Oct 25, 2013
67
30
BC
✟30,093.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Also as to your question 'why have monogomy'? Human cultures throughout history have not always practiced monogomy. Many cultures still do not. In many cases it made more sense for survival of the species to conform to... other arrangements.

Also, evolution does not not automatically imply that humans are selfish or soulless. It merely demonstrates how life has diversified over time. It says nothing of souls whatsoever.
 
Reactions: gzt
Upvote 0