Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Citations please.As far as I ever knew or heard, there are honest ones who know and reveal the "traces of this grand migration"..
The sad old "conspiracy" dodge.So, this being the case, those who know and show and agree with the traces of this "grand migration" are summarily (without notice, without any honest trial, etc) ignored, dismissed, dissed, and called all sorts of various names, unkindly.... oh, and of course, "black-listed"...
No commentary on the OP? Just spewing for Jesus?It is actually a guess by someone who thinks they are educated.
Why does a specific belief from a specific set of cultures get an exception to the general untrustworthiness of humanity?"All society is pernicious". No dodge. Reality. As Written.
Would it help in finding out the truth (is the truth what matters, or culture more than truth?) if the answer to this question was/is/ known ?Why does a specific belief from a specific set of cultures get an exception to the general untrustworthiness of humanity?
I don't know what you mean.Would it help in finding out the truth (is the truth what matters, or culture more than truth?) if the answer to this question was/is/ known ?
What matters is not what others belief nor what they teach or preach,I don't know what you mean.
I was trying to point out that you are declaring every bit of scientific research and every biblical interpretation unreliable... but the specific sub set of YEC Christians aren't for no stated reason.
Each animal was handpicked by God, not Noah.
So if God desired quick speciation, he could plan it without blinking.
The need to layer unmentioned miracle upon unmentioned miracle to keep the narrative consistent with evidence just keeps making the literal tale seem less consistent with any honest reading of the bible.
Nothing was half formed. They changed with no intermediate forms in one generation.
The latest view of Jewish genealogy is that it was based on generational groups under the name of the patriarch of that generation. This means that we are not only viewing it according to the lifetime of the patriarch himself, but the lifetimes of all his descendants within that generational group. Because lifetimes were so much longer, up to 1000 years in one case, it is quite believable that the time frame could be many thousands of years more than Ussher and others calculated.
For example, many have wondered how Cain could have gone to the land of Nod and married a wife, when he had just killed Abel. The fact is, that there is no time frame mentioned between the killing of Abel and Cain going to the land of Nod. It could have been a couple of hundred years later, when there was a sizable population in the land of Nod.
Also, after the Flood, people had very lengthy lifetimes, and we don't know how long it was before the Tower of Babel event, nor how long before Abraham departed from Ur of the Chaldees to Canaan. We could be talking about thousands of years here.
Therefore, the Bible has many time-frame gaps, which could very well account for humans to be inhabiting the Americas 20,000 years ago. It is an established fact that they were, as well as the discovery of sea shells and fossilised sea creatures high up in the Andes mountains which shows that the sea covered them at one stage, and that could only have happened in a world-wide flood.
So, if we decide to believe the Bible to be true, we can say what took place as being true, but how these things happened cannot be reliably determined because we just don't have enough information to make that determination.
Either go find it,......
tell me how do you get this?
in under a year?
Correct. or rather simple: if someone wants something, how do they get it?ummm what? no comprende.
Correct. or rather simple: if someone wants something, how do they get it?
They either find it, or buy it...... right ? Maybe there's other ways also (almost certainly there are other ways also) .....
I don't get this (who said "there are not"? )I get that, I'm asking what any of that has to do with pointing out that there are not seashell's found on mountains as if to imply the flood left them lying there.
The problem is that many don't want to accept that there was a total world-wide flood that covered the mountains. If they accepted it to be true, then they would have to accept that if the Bible is true about the Flood, then it must be true about many other things, for example, you and me - that we are sinners, deserving of hell, and needing to be saved by the grace of God.I don't get this (who said "there are not"? )
- there are fossils, seashells and other things, found on mountains directly because the worldwide flood Yahuweh sent to destroy mankind all over the earth left them there. Simple. We don't have to "imply" anything.
The problem is that many don't want to accept that there was a total world-wide flood that covered the mountains. If they accepted it to be true, then they would have to accept that if the Bible is true about the Flood, then it must be true about many other things, for example, you and me - that we are sinners, deserving of hell, and needing to be saved by the grace of God.
And they will defend that with all the counter-arguments they can make up.
So, believing in the Flood or not, is not a matter of the intellect, but of the will.
Because there is absolutely no evidence for such an event.The problem is that many don't want to accept that there was a total world-wide flood that covered the mountains.
Most Christians don't bother with it and believe that there is a God to whom they are accountable and in salvation offered through faith in Christ without lumbering themselves with YECism.If they accepted it to be true, then they would have to accept that if the Bible is true about the Flood, then it must be true about many other things, for example, you and me - that we are sinners, deserving of hell, and needing to be saved by the grace of God.
If they accept the Flood as a real historical event, which it is, then they have to accept that there is a God to Whom they are accountable. But what stops them is that they want to be their own gods, to choose for themselves how they want to live their lives. And they will defend that with all the counter-arguments they can make up.
So, believing in the Flood or not, is not a matter of the intellect, but of the will.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?