No, but Genesis does say that he was a "saris," which is usually translated as "eunuch" even when the other kind of saris is referred to. Since you agree that he was not a eunuch, then you must agree that he was gay.
He could not satisfy his wife sexually, and he purchased Joseph because of how beautiful Joseph was. These are a couple of the "veiled hints" that I referred to in my earlier post.
Upvote
0