• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Herod beheaded John without Roman approval

tonychanyt

24/7 Christian
Oct 2, 2011
6,061
2,239
Toronto
Visit site
✟196,430.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Herod Antipas imprisoned John the Baptist because John criticized Herod’s marriage to Herodias, the former wife of his brother Philip. This marriage was deemed unlawful under Jewish law, and John’s public condemnation presented a political and religious challenge to Herod’s rule.

The execution of John occurred during a banquet when Herodias’ daughter danced for Herod. Pleased with her performance, Herod promised her anything she desired. Prompted by her mother, she asked for John’s head on a platter (Mt 14:8). Despite his distress, Herod complied to save face before his guests.

The decision to execute John seemed to have been made hastily and impulsively, motivated by Herod’s desire to maintain his reputation and honor in front of his court. The biblical account does not explicitly mention Herod seeking Roman approval for this act.

Was Herod allowed to execute someone without Rome's explicit approval?

The high priest had to ask Pilate to execute Jesus because he lacked the authority to carry out capital punishment. However, Herod was a tetrarch with limited authority to execute individuals within his jurisdiction, especially if they were perceived as threats to his rule. As long as he did not go too far, Rome would not investigate him.

Josephus gave a different reason for executing John. He wrote:

John was becoming too popular for Herod's liking. Herod feared that John might incite a rebellion, so he executed him preemptively. There was no mention of Rome's reaction to this capital punishment. As a tetrarch, he had the authority to carry out executions.
 

Hoping2

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2024
1,549
391
71
Phoenix
✟50,909.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't buy that explanation.
Herod was Rome, in his authority and deed.
 
Upvote 0

timf

Regular Member
Jun 12, 2011
1,450
586
✟129,080.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Was Herod allowed to execute someone without Rome's explicit approval?

Possibly. Pilate sent Jesus to Herod for judgement, so possibly Herod did have that authority..

One should be a little skeptical with Josephus. I would go with the capricious motive the bible renders more than the calculating political master Josephus seems to describe. Besides Josephus wrote several decades after the events.
 
Reactions: tonychanyt
Upvote 0