It's just lucky that Trump happens to be free at the moment and not involved in running a country in the middle of a pandemic or something...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
An appointment to the newly created Department of White Grievances may be coming.
Missouri governor says Trump is ‘getting involved’ in case of St. Louis couple who pointed guns at protesters
The Missouri couple seen in a viral video brandishing guns at protesters outside their mansion have been charged, the St. Louis circuit attorney said.
Patricia and Mark McCloskey are charged with unlawful use of a weapon, a class E felony, according to the complaint.
"It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis," Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner said in a statement.
Report: Patricia McCloskey's handgun inoperable when seized by police
Legal Docs: Prosecutor Tampered With Evidence In McCloskey Gun Case
It turns out that the wife's pistol was inoperable due to having been improperly assembled, and so the prosecutor's office ordered the ballistics team to re-assemble it to take the ballistics sample.
Not only does this potentially equate to evidence tampering under state law, the fact that the gun could not be fired means that the charges leveled against her are no longer valid as stated. As such, the state attorney general has officially requested that the charges be dropped.
Report: Patricia McCloskey's handgun inoperable when seized by police
Legal Docs: Prosecutor Tampered With Evidence In McCloskey Gun Case
It turns out that the wife's pistol was inoperable due to having been improperly assembled, and so the prosecutor's office ordered the ballistics team to re-assemble it to take the ballistics sample.
Not only does this potentially equate to evidence tampering under state law, the fact that the gun could not be fired means that the charges leveled against her are no longer valid as stated. As such, the state attorney general has officially requested that the charges be dropped.
When my pistol is improperly assembled, it also has the effect of rendering my AR-15 inoperable. I need to find some better guns.
If these wonderful good patriotic true citizens can’t reassemble a pistol correctly, perhaps we should look at having some sort of basic qualification before we let good people have possession of dangerous weapons.
If their story is truthful, they will probably beat this rap.
What I find odd is that I have only seem one video of this exchange. Only one protestor was filming, and no home in the area had cameras?
That's huge in this day and age.
You have random neighbors running around your property with cameras? Glad I don't live in town.What I find odd is that I have only seem one video of this exchange. Only one protestor was filming, and no home in the area had cameras?
That's huge in this day and age.
You have random neighbors running around your property with cameras? Glad I don't live in town.
How can the neighbors camera be scanning thier property? Wouldn't that be an invasion of privacy? At any rate, I saw the video of a crowd of protesters right next to thier house, so I'm puzzled by what people mean about no footage.A neighborhood with high-end homes commonly have cameras mounted outside to record suspicious activity or any acts of crime that happen there. That's what security cameras do.
How can the neighbors camera be scanning thier property? Wouldn't that be an invasion of privacy? At any rate, I saw the video of a crowd of protesters right next to thier house, so I'm puzzled by what people mean about no footage.
Like I said, glad I don't live in town. I sometimes take the occasional shower in the back yard. I might be arrested...I've had a neighbor that lives in a house located just 5 feet away from mine put up a camera that pointed over my fence into my backyard. I discovered that it does not violate any laws even though I felt it invaded my privacy.
Like I said, glad I don't live in town. I sometimes take the occasional shower in the back yard. I might be arrested...
How can the neighbors camera be scanning thier property? Wouldn't that be an invasion of privacy? At any rate, I saw the video of a crowd of protesters right next to thier house, so I'm puzzled by what people mean about no footage.
You have random neighbors running around your property with cameras? Glad I don't live in town.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?