Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just so I understand the intent of the thread (and know which points I need to provide a rebuttal for)...is the intent of the thread to:
A) Make a statement about gun ownership?
B) Claim that they were racists who just pointed a gun at innocent people who were peacefully protesting?
or
C) The finer points of the binding contracts and property laws regarding HOA agreements?
D) These are dangerous garbage people, much like the dangerous garbage people at CHOP.
Just so I understand the intent of the thread (and know which points I need to provide a rebuttal for)...is the intent of the thread to:
A) Make a statement about gun ownership?
B) Claim that they were racists who just pointed a gun at innocent people who were peacefully protesting?
or
C) The finer points of the binding contracts and property laws regarding HOA agreements?
D) These are dangerous garbage people, much like the dangerous garbage people at CHOP.
They are completely morally bankrupt people. Disgusting.The St. Louis couple who made the news for waving their guns around are also involved in a lawsuit against the private neighborhood in which they live.
The Portland Place couple, now known for pulling out a pistol and rifle and pointing them at protesters who walked by their mansion on the way to Mayor Lyda Krewson’s house in the Central West End, said they were scared. They said they were defending their property.
That’s what the two attorneys have been doing in St. Louis Circuit Court since 2017, defending a sliver of property in what they call the “private place” of the toney neighborhood where they live. The defendants in the case are the trustees of Portland Place, who say a triangle of land that the McCloskeys claim as their own actually belongs to the neighborhood.
It’s a battle that is personal to the McCloskeys. So much so that this isn’t the first time one of them has pulled a gun on someone. In fact, the McCloskeys offer that action as evidence that they have owned the section of land near the pedestrian gate on Kingshighway that borders their property.
“Between the time of acquisition of One Portland Place and the construction of the above-referenced ten foot wall, the McCloskeys regularly prohibited all persons, including Portland Place residents, from crossing the Parcel including at least at one point, challenging a resident at gun point who refused to heed the McCloskeys’ warnings to stay off such property,” states an affidavit in the lawsuit.
Such it is in Private St. Louis, where the trustees of Portland Place say the sliver of land belongs to them, as it was described in assessor’s documents more than 116 years ago, and the McCloskeys say the legal concept of “adverse possession” means they own it.
Per Wikipedia: "Adverse possession, sometimes colloquially described as "squatter's rights", is a legal principle under which a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property — usually land — acquires legal ownership based on continuous possession or occupation of the property without the permission of its legal owner."
They are completely morally bankrupt people. Disgusting.
What does that have to do with the morally bankrupt couple who brandished their guns in St. Louis?That's what we've been warning about all this time. At least the CHOP zone has finally been chopped up and the area returned to the rightful owners, minus all the damage the CHOP people did while they killed each other.
What does that have to do with the morally bankrupt couple who brandished their guns in St. Louis?
Oh well then you should go back and re-read my post so that you can see it was directly in response to an article specifically about the St. Louis couple trying to scam land from their development by squatting on it, which has absolutely nothing to do with BLM or Antifa. Do you support the morally bankrupt St. Louis couple and squatter's rights???Oh, I thought you were talking about the BLM/Antifa group that were actually killing each other with their guns.
I dunno, 'gun toting jerks' 'squatting on land'.....I mean there seems to be a connection there, right?
What police?....you mean they actually showed up?....and whose land were they squatting on?....bet the police union got involved in that one.....Sure, but enough about the police. That's not what this thread is about.
-CryptoLutheran
D) These are dangerous garbage people, much like the dangerous garbage people at CHOP.
I'm still trying to figure out what the protesters were doing in their neighborhood if they claimed they were just passing through to get to the mayor's house.
Oh well then you should go back and re-read my post so that you can see it was directly in response to an article specifically about the St. Louis couple trying to scam land from their development by squatting on it, which has absolutely nothing to do with BLM or Antifa. Do you support the morally bankrupt St. Louis couple and squatter's rights???
Those are some nasty people.Way more detail than anyone needs about their litigious and squatting behavior.
Way more detail than anyone needs about their litigious and squatting behavior.
Does it really matter? Did MLK really need to be on the Edmund Pettus Bridge? You don't need to go through Selma to get to Montgomery.
I am surprised he hasn’t had a Cabinet position in Trump’s Administration yet. No wonder they are held in such high esteem by some of the posters on CF.
Fear and ignorance are often deadly when guns are introduced into the mix. The McCloskeys demonstrated all three and are very fortunate things didn't really go sideways.An appointment to the newly created Department of White Grievances may be coming.
Missouri governor says Trump is ‘getting involved’ in case of St. Louis couple who pointed guns at protesters
Missouri Gov. Mike Parson said Tuesday that President Trump would be “getting involved” in the case of the St. Louis couple who pointed guns at a group of protesters passing outside their home last month, and who are under review for criminal charges.
On Tuesday, both the president and Republican governor offered separate impassioned defenses of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who went viral after brandishing guns at protesters on the private street outside their mansion on June 28.
The prosecutor investigating the McCloskeys, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner (D), responded by accusing Trump and Parsons of playing politics with a local criminal investigation. Gardner said the facts of the case and the applicable laws are still under review and she would “apply them equally, regardless of the people involved.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?