DogmaHunter
Code Monkey
- Jan 26, 2014
- 16,757
- 8,531
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Neither of these points are claims that I made. Try responding to my actual post if you wish to respond.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Two things.
1) Small changes over time has never been shown to produce a banana and a human from the same common ancestor.
2) The viewpoint that only naturalistic mechanisms have been shown to produce a banana and a human from the same common ancestor has absolutely no support.
Euler said:You don't have to know the origins of something to gain an understanding of how it works.
Euler said:Correct.
We don't need to explain the origins of things that aren't even demonstrated to exist.
If you watch a construction site for 5 minutes and don't see a new building appear, do you doubt the ability of man to build buildings?
And you have pulled out all of the fossils from the ground? The transitional species Tiktaalik took 3 years to find, and that was just one species. Why do you expect us to have thousands of transitional species when we have searched such a tiny, tiny portion of the fossil record?
What you do ignore is that every fossil we have found supports evolution. All of the transitionals fall into the predicted nested hierarchy. Why do you ask for more transitionals when you ignore the ones we do have?
If a lineage is well adapted there is no reason for it to change.
My point is that evolution, based on "The origin of the species" can't even explain the origin of the life that is necessary for the species, how is it going to explain the origin of the spiritual realm as well.
I guess denying the existence of a spiritual realm or another dimension would solve that though.
None of the fossils support evolution. Every fossil proves one thing, that that organism existed and was covered with sediment to preserve it at that moment of time.
Evolution IS a science.
madaz said:The last few hundred years has seen a rift between science and bible literalists growing larger by the year, so good luck with that idea.
mazdaz said:Agreed, creationists use science in devious ways to advocate their nonsense to the vulnerable, gullible and the uneducated
Mazdaz said:Evolution has never attempted to explain the origin of life, it's not meant to, that is a completely different discipline.
It is not "a" science" it is a hoax using scewed data to eeak out some sort of explanation for it's lie.
And still no proof or transition between species.
Darwin's own words state that this will be the biggest problem in the proof of the lie called a "theory".
The promoters of Evolution have the hoaxes of the embryos, piltown man and lucy as well as others to show that evolution is based on devious ways to advocate it's nonsense.
You have no beginning and no proof of the steps between the beginning and the end. Just assumptions and guesses of the past.
None of the fossils support evolution. Every fossil proves one thing, that that organism existed and was covered with sediment to preserve it at that moment of time.
Yeah, just like a body with a knife sticking out the back is not evidence of murder, but just of a human that lived and then died of unkown causes.
Or, you could try not engaging in juvenile intellectual dishonesty...
Do you have a fossil of any transitional stages from ape to human?
that should be everywhere due to the billions of years that this whole thing took place?
Yet, all you have is repeat after repeat of certain stages.. that is all...no, transitions.
Even Darwin, in his life time, stated that this was a huge problem. He hoped time would show more but never have.
I realize using words like "magic" when speaking of how God created His creation is to elicit certain emotional reactions, but to ask for evidence that a pine tree and a whale has the same common ancestor, and evidence they were created by only naturalistic mechanisms isn't worded to elicit emotional reactions. It's a valid request.
Granted, the responses to the request is usually one of mockery from those who hold to the faith based view of creation by only naturalistic mechanisms.
That would be because the ancestry between those two things is so distant that when you got to their last common ancestor you wouldn't recognize it as having really much in the way of traits of either modern species.
That would be because the ancestry between those two things is so distant that when you got to their last coon ancestor you wouldn't recognize it as having really much in the way of traits of either modern species.
My question is since you know very little about either the science or the evidence, how do you come to the conclusion that this is "guesses and suppositions"?Guesses and suppositions.
PsychoSarahJust My question is since you know very little about either the science or the evidence, how do you come to the conclusion that this is "guesses and suppositions"?
I am really curious about how how you come to conclusions about things of which you know virtually nothing.
Inquiring minds and all of that.
Dizredux
PsychoSarahJust My question is since you know very little about either the science or the evidence, how do you come to the conclusion that this is "guesses and suppositions"?
I am really curious about how how you come to conclusions about things of which you know virtually nothing.
Inquiring minds and all of that.
Dizredux
He needs it to be guesses and suppositions. Having actual objective evidence of the same, is too scary a thought to contemplate.
I noticed that you did not attempt to answer my questions. Rather par for the course.Shucks, maybe someone could learn me something about a single life form becoming a human....and a pine tree.
Do you know enough to try?
Mmmmm stepping into this, start with either Adam and Eve or even Moses and tell me the names of all of your ancestors leading up to you.Start with the first life form and go.
I noticed that you did not attempt to answer my questions. Rather par for the course.
As to your question, it has happened many times with humans except in the case of Jesus and the virgin birth.
Dizredux
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?