• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

depthdeception

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2005
3,863
151
44
✟4,804.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married

Good question, ittarter. I would say that good does, in a manner of speaking, have ontological existence, although I would not separate it from the ontology of God, as if it were something "other than" God (in the same way that the creation is "other than" God).

My reason for arguing about "evil" in the way that I do is that our doctrine of God must be such that we are able to maintain the eternality and self-sufficiency of God at all times. If evil is the "opposite" of good, which good is eternally essential with the nature and existence of God, then we must conclude that evil--as an opposite--is somehow on an equal ontological playing field. In such a scenario, we wind up with either 1.) two eternally existing Gods (which violates the "God is One" principle) or 2.) two eternally self-negating principles, resulting in a classic Adamsian "Poof!"

However, if we understand evil not as something which "exists" (and is therefore "opposite" of and existentially equivalent with good), but rather as something which is only conceptually understood as the diminution of good, we are free of the logical malady which the acknowledgment of the existence of evil would afford. We still, of course, are left with the limitation of language; nonetheless, I think the distinction is critical.
 
Upvote 0