Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I sure do: myopia.
Are you referring to "Darwin's Doubt" by Stephen Meyer?
I'm sure they would.If you can come up with a test to actually come up with a way to test for God, scientists across the world would be all ears.
I'm sure they would.
Three well-known tests in history were tried, and all three failed:
Here's a fourth "honorable mention" test that failed also:
- Turn stones to bread.
- Jump off of a high pinnacle.
- Worship the tester.
Matthew 27:42 He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.
And I don't think you know the difference between "pseudoscience" and "no science."I don't think you know what a scientific test is.
And I don't think you know the difference between "pseudoscience" and "no science."
Not to mention what "invisible" means.
I have two:
- The tares are outgrowing the wheat.
- The last days are marked by a departure by those giving heed to seducing spirits.
"For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect." (Matt 24:24)
It's simple consistent evidence.
I'm not a YEC and I don't know what to think about Noah's flood.
My point was that your standards of evidence are radically inconsistent.Thank you.
"Species diversity is defined as being the number of species present in an ecosystem. Disparity, on the other hand, is how morphologically different they are from each other. For example, an ecosystem with one species of grass, one rabbit, and a hawk would have very low diversity, but very high disparity.diversity and disparity is a weird stance to try and take. Diversity means the quality of things being diverse and different, we see that in all points throughout the fossil record. Disparity means the state of something being unequal. What does that have to do with the theory of evolution?
Pseudoscience is stuff like Darwinists concocting a hypothesis about how this or that evolved without putting their hypothesis to the test. That happened a lot in evolution "science" ... why bother with the scientific method when you can invent fairy tales and pass them off as science?Pseudoscience is stuff like creationism and...
Please tell me how the lense of the eye might have evolved, and then tell me how you test your hypothesis.I don't think you know what a scientific test is.
Pseudoscience is stuff like Darwinists concocting a hypothesis about how this or that evolved without putting their hypothesis to the test. That happened a lot in evolution "science" ... why bother with the scientific method when you can invent fairy tales and pass them off as science?
"It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another, and to find reasons why the stages should be favoured by natural selection. But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test." (Dr. Colin Patterson)
"No fossil is buried with its birth certificate. That, and the scarcity of fossils, means that it is effectively impossible to link fossils into chains of cause and effect in any valid way... To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story—amusing, perhaps even instructive, but not scientific."
(Henry Gee, "In Search of Deep Time")
I have that book but I can't find any reference to Tiktaalik.Oh yes, thank you for the correction.Buzzard3 said:Are you referring to "Darwin's Doubt" by Stepen Meyer?
An hypothesis that can't be tested is worthless as science, so is it no fair to call it pseudoscience?Hypotheses about the specific evolutionary path of any particular species is not pseudoscience
Being unable to handle facts,Being unable to handle facts,Buzzard3 said:Spoken like a true Darwinist missionary, whose only reason for being on this Christian site is to spread the gospel of evolution.
now you are just being silly.
Try the scientific impossibility of abiogenesisIf you can come up with a test to actually come up with a way to test for God, scientists across the world would be all ears.
I have that book but I can't find any reference to Tiktaalik.
But why should there be? One lucky find is hardly statistically significant.
Btw, I'm not sure that Meyer denies that evolution has occured.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?