• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Flood, literal or not?

Beastt

Legend
Mar 12, 2004
12,966
1,019
Arizona
✟40,898.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
No, thanks; either way--- we're on the winning side:

[bible]1 Thessalonians 4:17[/bible]

or

[bible]Psalm 116:15[/bible]

Living in an unsupportable belief which causes one to reject the demonstrable discoveries of science is not winning. When you proudly declare, (as you do in your signature), that you refuse to accept truth if it is other than what you wish it to be, you are not demonstrating that you are a winner. You're demonstrating an insistence to reject truth wherever it conflicts with your desires.

Because of this, I am saddened for you. I believe you have been victimized. But I can only present the evidence of reality. If you choose to ignore that evidence and instead live in the unverifiable words of an ancient and demonstrably false book, it is sad, but it is your choice.
 
Upvote 0

Beastt

Legend
Mar 12, 2004
12,966
1,019
Arizona
✟40,898.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
As I have just demonstrated, it's both.
It is neither. You can't assert that it's logical when you can't even present the concept of God as being logical. If it were logical and reasonable, believers would have no need of faith.

Yes --- physical evidence contradicts Scripture --- but that is the nature of ex nihilo creation.
You can't assert any nature of ex-nihilo creation when you can't even demonstrate ex-nihilo creation to be real. In fact, you can't even demonstrate creation to be real. Where have you ever seen any act of creation? It doesn't happen, isn't evidenced to happen, and, (outside of specific quantum phenomenon), is contrary to reality.

You can't confine God's handiwork to the readings of a man-made machine.
You can't demonstrate any handiwork to be that of God. You keep leaping over the realities to reach fantasies.

Not hardly.
Of course it would. If God built a false age into the Earth, (and indeed, the universe), that would be an act of intentional deception. Intentional deception is the primary component in lying.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Real.

Of course.


It was on the mountains of Ararat. That could be one of many mountains. If there was some great upheaval after the flood, we may not expect to see the ark just sitting on a mountain top. But it is somewhere.
 
Upvote 0

FishFace

Senior Veteran
Jan 12, 2007
4,535
169
36
✟20,630.00
Faith
Atheist

There is no epistemological difference than claiming that the earth is 3 days old, "existentially."
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,999
52,622
Guam
✟5,143,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

And therein is a major difference between you and I.

To you, truth and god are two different things.

To me, Truth and God are one and the same.

You keep using the word "demonstrate", overlooking the fact that God did demonstrate His existence with signs and wonders - but was still rejected.

Do you honestly think He's going to repeat Himself over and over to every generation that comes along?

What do you think would happen right now if God were to shout at us from the sky loud enough for all to hear?

I'll tell you what would happen --- the same thing as before:

[bible]John 12:29[/bible]

The Bible makes it clear that even when Jesus comes back physically and rules and reigns with a rod of iron here on the earth in His own kingdom --- people are going to reject Him; and not just reject Him, but I mean to the point where they go after Him again to do away with Him - (Revelation 20).

But this time it's gonna be different.

My suggestion is for you to get on the winning side (if you haven't already) before it's too late.

Please!
 
Upvote 0

flatworm

Veteran
Dec 13, 2006
1,394
153
✟24,922.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
And therein is a major difference between you and I.

To you, truth and god are two different things.

To me, Truth and God are one and the same.

It seems you use the word "God" merely as an excuse not to question whatever beliefs you prefer to hold.

You keep using the word "demonstrate", overlooking the fact that God did demonstrate His existence with signs and wonders - but was still rejected.

You have one ancient book among many ancient books that claim this happened.

Have you ever seen "The X-Files"? The movie "Signs"? How about "The Exorcism of Emily Rose"? The theme of skeptics being proven wrong with overwhelming evidence is a popular one - in fiction, including the Bible. In real life this doesn't happen. You might wonder why. I no longer do.

Do you honestly think He's going to repeat Himself over and over to every generation that comes along?

Supposedly such a being would be cable of it, supposedly the stakes warrant it, and supposedly this being cares. Even if this being exists obviously one of the above must be false.

What do you think would happen right now if God were to shout at us from the sky loud enough for all to hear?

I'll tell you what would happen --- the same thing as before:

[bible]John 12:29[/bible]

If you have evidence or logical arguments, I'm all ears. Else keep your wish-fulfillment fantasies to yourself.


Like I said, thousands of years of failed prophecy indicate the above is nothing more than a fantasy. Please don't feel you need to inflict it on the rest of us.
 
Upvote 0

MrGoodBytes

Seeker for life, probably
Mar 4, 2006
5,868
286
✟30,272.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
On the contrary. Even Jesus himself supplied physical evidence of his resurrection when the apostle Thomas didn't believe it.:

As you can see, God can supply physical evidence for his existence to unbelievers, and has done so at least once already. The fact that he seems to prefer faith without evidence is irrelevant, IMHO.

I appreciate your concern, but there are representatives from thousands of other religions telling me exactly the same. For the moment, I see no reason to prefer one of you over the other.
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Like I said, thousands of years of failed prophecy indicate the above is nothing more than a fantasy. Please don't feel you need to inflict it on the rest of us.

Thousands of years of what false prophecy? Show me a false prophecy... It would seem that all the prophecy has come to pass up to the present. Even so this one.

II Peter 3:3 & 4

Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, and saying, "Where is the promise of HIS coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as from the beginning of creation."
 
Upvote 0

flatworm

Veteran
Dec 13, 2006
1,394
153
✟24,922.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Thousands of years of what false prophecy? Show me a false prophecy... It would seem that all the prophecy has come to pass up to the present. Even so this one.

Here's a quick rundown:

http://www.abhota.info/end1.htm

Many of these are biblical in origin. Since they've failed, of course, other believers are quick to claim it's only the interpretation that's wrong... but we have yet to see an interpretation confirmed right!

If you care to watch the religious game of "Absolute Truth!" -> "Oops!" -> "Interpretational Error" -> "New Absolute Truth!", I present to you:

http://www.truebiblecode.com/


We've been over this. Thousands of years of scoffers. Over 730 000 "last days" and counting.

So come up with something verifiable or just spare us all your wish-fulfillment fantasy.
 
Upvote 0

Beastt

Legend
Mar 12, 2004
12,966
1,019
Arizona
✟40,898.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
No false prophecy? I think it fair to say that any prophecy which does not come to pass is false. The most important of all Christian prophecies certainly never has come to pass. Of Christians today, a full 22% are absolutely certain that Jesus will return in their lifetime. Another 22% are fairly sure he will return in their lifetime. And these figures have varied very little from generation to generation. Yet it hasn't come to pass for any of them. All indications are that it never will come to pass. So the most important of all Christian prophecies is, by any reasonable measure, a false prophecy.

The Bible suggests a single planet, created just for man, which sits stationary at the center of the solar system, around which move the sun, moon and stars. Around 400 to 500 years ago, some began to suggest in earnest that this wasn't true. Christians threatened some of these people and still the evidence persisted. Then they imprisoned some of these people, and the evidence persisted. They even killed some of these people and the evidence persisted. Eventually, even Christians came to accept the idea that the world is not the center of the universe, around which everything else revolves. So they changed the way they read the Bible and continued with their faith.

The Bible suggests that man sprang from the dust as a fully-formed adult human. A couple hundred years ago, (or less), people began seriously considering the idea that this isn't true and even that man is an animal, who evolved from species which we today recognize as non-human animals. Of course to Christians, the idea was absurd. But it became a dangerous idea because even Christians seemed to be fooled by the evidence. So the threats started, the trials started and laws were formed to protect good, God-fearing Christians from the concept of evolution. But despite the best efforts of Christians to hide and deny the evidence the vast majority of the world's population now accepts that the Bible's insinuations are incorrect and that we did indeed, evolve from non-human animals. Today even many Christians accept evolution. So they again changed the way they read their Bible and continue with their beliefs.

Then the great flood came under attack. It was pointed out that rain must have a source and that the source is insufficient to do what the Bible claims. We found out that the Ark, as described in the Bible wouldn't have been sea-worthy. We found out that there isn't any way to put all of the necessary animals on a vessel that size and keep them alive as the Bible suggests. We found out that floods leave a record in the geologic column and that there is no record of the Bible's global flood. So Christians have done what they have always done, they change the way they read the Bible and continue to proclaim that it holds ultimate truth. Above all, they continue to insist that it's most important prophecy will come to pass, no matter how many generations come and go without the fulfillment of its prophecy.

The most important Christian prophecy is the return of Jesus which has never been fulfilled. There is no reasonable expectation that it will ever be fulfilled. And without that, even if every other Christian prophecy had been fulfilled, they would be meaningless to Christianity.
 
Reactions: RealityCheck
Upvote 0

AdHoc

Active Member
Feb 4, 2007
46
3
✟176.00
Faith
Atheist
As I have just demonstrated, it's both.
No, you haven't demonstrated that it's either.

Yes --- physical evidence contradicts Scripture --- but that is the nature of ex nihilo creation.
No, it's not. The physical evidence could easily suggest a world 6,000 years old. It doesn't, because the world isn't 6,000 years old.

You can't confine God's handiwork to the readings of a man-made machine.
Copout, and completely irrelevant.

Not hardly.
Yup.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,999
52,622
Guam
✟5,143,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No false prophecy? I think it fair to say that any prophecy which does not come to pass is false. The most important of all Christian prophecies certainly never has come to pass.

And what prophecy would that be, Beastt?

People who claim the Bible has false prophecies in it are a dime a dozen --- let's up the ante and see a chapter and verse --- fair enough?

Or, as I suspect, is it much easier to generalize?
 
Upvote 0

Beastt

Legend
Mar 12, 2004
12,966
1,019
Arizona
✟40,898.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
And what prophecy would that be, Beastt?

People who claim the Bible has false prophecies in it are a dime a dozen --- let's up the ante and see a chapter and verse --- fair enough?

Or, as I suspect, is it much easier to generalize?
You don't know what the most important prophecy in Christianity is? Can't you even guess?

I thought I offered a fairly obvious clue when I said, "Of Christians today, a full 22% are absolutely certain that Jesus will return in their lifetime. Another 22% are fairly sure he will return in their lifetime."

Or do you think Christianity doesn't promise that Jesus will return? It certainly hasn't happened. And you can't simply hold out forever and claim that it might still happen. Or did it happen and we all just missed it?

Let me try my hand at atheist prophecy. There will come a time when Christians will start to realize that they were offered a false promise. And to follow the trend of biblical prophecies, I'm not going to say when this will happen. But there will be signs. As we enter this time we will see storms, wars among nations, buildings will fall, lightning shall come out of the east, predators shall gather around pray and scavengers around the fallen.

We'll see how I do.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,999
52,622
Guam
✟5,143,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You don't know what the most important prophecy in Christianity is? Can't you even guess?

Oh I know what it is alright --- I just don't know it as a false prophecy.

Beastt said:
I thought I offered a fairly obvious clue when I said, "Of Christians today, a full 22% are absolutely certain that Jesus will return in their lifetime. Another 22% are fairly sure he will return in their lifetime."

That's my point. Let's skip clues and go right to the heart. Chapter and verse --- fair enough?

Beastt said:
Or do you think Christianity doesn't promise that Jesus will return?

I've heard rumors to that effect.

Beastt said:
It certainly hasn't happened.

I've heard rumors to that effect as well.

Beastt said:
And you can't simply hold out forever and claim that it might still happen.

And why not?

Beastt said:
Or did it happen and we all just missed it?

Not quite yet.


Here, let me help you out --- is this what you're talking about:

Matthew 24:34 said:
Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.

Or, better yet, is it this?

Matthew 16:28 said:
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Are you saying, Beastt, that one or both of these are false prophecies?
 
Upvote 0

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Are you saying, Beastt, that one or both of these are false prophecies?

These are two of my personal faves in terms of unfulfilled prophecies. In order to run the Apologetics-o-matic to make the "yet to be fulfilled" you have to resort to concept that Jesus didn't say what he said. While Jesus did indeed speak in parables so that some hearing would not hear and not be saved, this seems pretty clear. Clear as day.

Now, if words are so devoid of meaning, I guess it would be OK if I just went willy-nilly through the Bible and unilaterally decreed that

[BIBLE]1 Samuel 5:4[/BIBLE]

really means "You should send all of your money to Thaumaturgy and then you should give him all the sugary cereal in your cupboard."

Sadly for prophecy-philes words have to mean something or we are all equally lost. If Jesus said something and it doesn't mean what it says then he effectively said nothing.

If I hide my meaning in such possible alternative meanings as to render the statement to mean what was not said and say what was not meant, then I have done absolutely nothing of value. It would be better had I not spoken at all.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,999
52,622
Guam
✟5,143,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
...and then you should give him all the sugary cereal in your cupboard."

No dice --- I'm a grouch if I don't get my Fruit Loops in the morning!
 
Upvote 0

Jadis40

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2004
963
192
51
Indiana, USA
✟54,645.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
There were no ice caps in Noah's time. The earth was one uniform tropical temperature.

There is absolutely no proof of this.

Except, there is absolutely no proof that the vapor canopy ever existed, and if it did, life on earth would have been impossible:

from www.godandscience.org:


And it most certainly did rain before the supposed global flood given the fact that agriculture originated long before Mesopotamia.

Even answersingenesis.org doesn't support the vapor canopy. I have to say I admire them for at least being intellectually honest in saying even they have problems with it, and it's based on science.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/AnswersBook/flood12.asp

I'm referring specifically to the section entitled A major problem with the canopy theory.

Here's tons of proof bearing out not only that the global flood never happened, but that that the earth is older than a mere 6,000 years old:

WHEAT: From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat
The earliest archaeological evidence for wheat cultivation comes from the Levant and Turkey. Around 10,000 years ago,[9] wild einkorn and emmer wheat were domesticated as part of the origins of agriculture in the fertile crescent.
There's also this here:
http://www.nelstrop.co.uk/wheat.asp

RICE: From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice

BARLEY: From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barley

Earliest evidence of farming of barley comes from archelological site of Indian subcontinent named Mehrgarh, from 7000 BC.
So there you are, archaeological proof (which uses the exact same methods as YECers) that the vapor canopy is nothing more than a myth, and conclusive proof, based on evidence of agriculture dating back BEFORE the supposed date of creation that the hydrologic cycle was in place from the very beginning, no pun intended, in 3 different regions of the world: India, China, and the Fertile Crescent.

Also, how can a global flood, which surely would have killed off all plant life, explain the appearance of certain species of grapes that are native to only specific areas of the world:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grape

Not to mention apples: http://www.bestapples.com/varieties/index.html

Sure, trade explains some of it, such as the Fuji being introduced to the US from Japan, but how do you get all those different species AFTER a global flood?

Seems to me YECers who believe in a global flood don't realize that they're proposing evolution on a massive scale, since supposedly all life after the event originated from the animals on the ark. Funny that the only plant that's mentioned after the fact is grapes. So, where did all the trees, that are native to only specific parts of the world, come from?

I will state that I used to believe in a global flood, until I actually started reading more about it, and I no longer believe that it covered the entire world, as seen from a 21st century perspective. Not to mention the fact that I have a degree in history, so I've studied different regions of the world that had contemporary civilizations spread out all over the face of the globe. Did the flood happen at some point? Yes...but not one that covered every single square inch of the planet. There's just way too much archaeological evidence (too much in fact that I won't go into detail here) spread out all over the world that disproves a global flood.

Now, as far as the dinosaurs, they died out about 65 million years ago.
 
Reactions: Beastt
Upvote 0