Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Compass bearings, map location?I mean't, how are they going to prove they are in Antarctica ?
We'll see.Compass bearings, map location?
It would be hard to confuse Antarctica with other places.
What???? Seriously???? That's the most inane question you've asked yet.How might they prove this ?
We will.We'll see.
You are good at learning things that others are not. Others are good learning things that you can't fathom. That's reality. But the difference is that others don't go on the internet to ridicule the things you are good at. You however do. You ridicule maths, physics and all science.My Math's was terrible, I always came bottom, I reckon it was because I always found it so tedious. I am trying to learn Spanish at the mo, I can say the Lords prayer in Spanish
You are good at learning things that others are not. Others are good learning things that you can't fathom. That's reality. But the difference is that others don't go on the internet to ridicule the things you are good at. You however do. You ridicule maths, physics and all science.
We will.
But as you've already cast doubt on the legitimacy of the trip, the credibility of the flat-earthers who are going and now the location of Antarctica itself, I'm not confident that you will accept any findings as valid.
No it's not, they must prove they are in Antarctica to begin with.What???? Seriously???? That's the most inane question you've asked yet.
That will be easily verified. The flight from Punta Arenas will take them over the coast of Antartica & they will continue flying deep inland. The flight time will be 4.5 hours. And there won’t be any area close to them where there could possibly be 24 sun unless the earth is a globe. Remember the only place on a flat earth where there could possibly be 24 sun is at the North Polar regions. And it will be very easy to verify that they won’t be anywhere near there.No it's not, they must prove they are in Antarctica to begin with.
No you have no good reason, you just can’t understand any of it. That means you don’t realise how ridiculous you sound.With good reason.
No you have no good reason, you just can’t understand any of it. That means you don’t realise how ridiculous you sound.
I'll put it to you in the simplest possible terms. To people who understand maths and physics, you telling them that what they are saying isn't true, is like saying that 1+1 does not equal 2. To such people that's how ridiculous your claim is. Because they are as certain of more complex maths & physics as they are of 1+1=2. It may be gobbledygook to you, but to them it is second nature.
I chatted with someone the other day who works at designing computer software for accountancy programs. He reads computer coding as you or I would read a book. To me it's gibberish, but to him everything makes sense. If there is a problem with any of the coding and the program doesn't work, he would spot it easily, correct it and fix the program.
Now if I was to tell him that his computer program coding is all nonsense and is just gobbledygook, he would rightly tell me that I don't know what I'm talking about.
That's the situation you are in when posting on these threads.
I don's care, do you know how ridiculous this all sounds ?No you have no good reason, you just can’t understand any of it. That means you don’t realise how ridiculous you sound.
You bear all the signs of indoctrination. People try to reason with you, try to help you, explain things to you, and all you have to say is “I don’t care”. Do you realise how ridiculous YOU sound to any rational person?I don's care, do you know how ridiculous this all sounds ?
Do you know how ridiculous YOU sound?I don's care, do you know how ridiculous this all sounds ?
So why did you say at the beginning of this thread that whatever evidence they found, you would accept as genuine, and that the guy was legit?Your right here.
What can I say, I changed my mind.In your first post in this thread, you said that you would be "keeping a close eye on this guy", post#12..
Then you said that you would accept any evidence they find as genuine, post#17. And that if this guy pulled it off, you would accept he was legit, post#19.
Then when it was pointed out that Dean Odel had been invited on this trip, your response was "wow! I'm really excited about this now," post#1004.
Now that Dean has confirmed that he is not going on this free trip you are saying "well they have to prove that they are in Antarctica - which they might be able to do. But whatever happens, and whatever they find; I'm not going to accept it."
(And, a minor point, please learn the difference between you're and your.)
It's not word, it's grammar.This is good, we now have the word police on hand
So you're not prepared to believe other flat-earthers? That says a lot.I did get excited as I knew we'd get the truth from Dean.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?