Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Jesus Christ, fine, transmembrane ionic flux during an action potential is a "current". Now do you have a point to all?
Baloney. Go back and replay your own video from McGraw Hill. They explained it about as clearly as one could possibly explain it.
What is the 'right' direction for charged particles to move?
*If* that were actually the case, McGraw-Hill and all those WIKI authors would not have called it a current!
So what? That direction of travel of the charged particles is irrelevant.
More denial I see. Not a single one of your references actually agreed with you.
Thank you.
The only point I was trying to make originally is that the mass layout patterns, and the flow of charged particles in the universe mirrors the mass layout patterns of intelligent organisms, specifically the brain cells of living organisms.
Thank you.
The only point I was trying to make originally is that the mass layout patterns, and the flow of charged particles in the universe mirrors the mass layout patterns of intelligent organisms, specifically the brain cells of living organisms.
So bunnies in clouds, then.
Then what is Morse code? What is AC current where the electrons wiggle back and forth, with but a slow drift along the wire? What is a relaxation oscillator?
Pulsed-current versus constant-voltage light-emitting electrochemical cells with trifluoromethyl-substituted cationic iridium(iii) complexes - Journal of Materials Chemistry C (RSC Publishing)
Apparently you didn't bother to read it.
Understanding the Transmission of Nerve Impulses - For Dummies
No. There are mass layout similarities in spacetime to living brain cells
and both structures carry current.
No, it doesn't. There is no stellar phenomena that even remotely resemble neuronal activity.
SCIENCE ILLUSTRATED - They Look Alike, but There's a Little Matter of Size - NYTimes.com
Apparently I'm not the only one to notice the similarities.
Dear God, no there are not. Seriously, I know guys who would literally have wet dreams over something like this and would be screaming to all of us if something like that was ever discovered. It hasn't.
Oh my God, you seriously think that because two things look vaguely similar, they must work the same?
If I was the first one to notice that similarity, your statements might not seem so silly to me.
I'm headed home now, and I'm not even going into the current issue again with you.
I didn't say that, you did. Nobody said they have to 'work the same' except you.
No. There are mass layout similarities in spacetime to living brain cells and both structures carry current.
BS. I said there was no stellar phenomena that resembled neuronal activity, and you posted that picture. You were stating exactly that, or this conversation is so completely over your head you have no idea what you are doing anymore.
You think galactic superclusters function like neurons because you found a simulated image that looks vaguely like a stain of a mouse neuron? Do I really have to say how completely insane that sounds?
I agree, and you still get it wrong.
Apparently you seem to think that electrical energy in plasma typically travels in straight lines or something. I don't see any evidence that you learned anything from that video, and I see direct evidence that you closed your eyes (pure denial) to the information it contained. It clearly spoke in terms of the flow of current, and you completely ignored it, apparently because you think electrical energy in plasma must necessarily travel in a straight line? Even in a Birkeland current, current doesn't travel in straight lines.You here one word, current, and then your ears and eyes close. Please, try and learn something.
So what? That's utterly irrelevant! Current in space *rarely* travels in a straight line. It forms Birkeland currents that create those "magnetic slinky" patterns (aka Birkeland currents) in space!If the nerve impulse was a current it would be along the body of the axon in the direction of the nerve impulse.
Utterly false. You *assume* that current travels in a straight line. It doesn't do that in plasma and it doesn't do that in brain cells either!It isn't. Instead, the ion flux is at a right angle to the nerve impulse. Therefore, the nerve impulse can not be a current.
I don't blame McGraw-Hill for anything. They explained those *currents* quite clearly! Too bad you can't comprehend what you watch.You can't even understand the basics of neurophysiology. Don't blame McGraw-Hill for that.
Who claimed current ran in straight lines in spacetime? It sure a heck wasn't me! Why would I even *expect*, let alone *require* the brain to carry current in "straight lines"?That's laughable. It is entirely relevant. The charged particles do not move down the neuron as a current as you claim.
The problem is that when I do a word search, "current", "voltage" and charged particles all appear in them. You're just in denial that the term "current" appears in every single one of them!Every single reference agrees with me. You need to do more than a word search for current.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?