Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's a current carrying structure and it's structured like a brain. You're one to talk. You can't even *see* your invisible bunnies in the sky.
Ya, and all of your so called observational "evidence" went up in smoke in the Planck data set.
Worse yet, you never showed any empirical cause/effect justification for claiming that your invisible friends even exist, let alone that they have any influence on even one single photon.
Another lie.
Of course it's still there. It's caused by inelastic scattering and moving objects, both of which occur/exist in space.Redshift is still there.
Nope. All we observe is signal broadening from distant supernova. You've never demonstrated that *signal broadening* is in any way related to "time dilation".Time dilation in distant supernovae are still there.
Nope. All of it points to inelastic scattering and moving objects. None of it points us to your mythical menagerie of invisible particles and energy.All of the evidence points to expansion.
Nothing like going personal because Planck ruined all your claims.All lies. Plenty of evidence has been given.
Why do I have the horrifying premonition that you think the brain actually carries current as if it's a bunch of copper wire?
Why do I have the horrifying premonition that you think the brain actually carries current as if it's a bunch of copper wire?
The only lie is your assumption that your invisible friends did it.
Of course it's still there. It's caused by inelastic scattering and moving objects, both of which occur/exist in space.
Nothing like going personal because Planck ruined all your claims.
There's no way to falsify your claims because you just make up new ad hoc entities to fill in the gaps,
Are you actually suggesting that the brain carries no current and/or it contains no conductive elements?
Are you actually suggesting that the brain carries no current
Brains don't carry currents.
Apparently better than you do.Do you even know what a nerve impulse is?
Baloney again. Your SUSY particles were a complete dud in the lab. Your mythical forms of energy have zero effect on any photon in any lab on Earth.It has been seen for decades now. Please catch up.
Baloney.
Neuron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Apparently better than you do.
Baloney again. Your SUSY particles were a complete dud in the lab. Your mythical forms of energy have zero effect on any photon in any lab on Earth.
It doesn't. Do you know what a nerve impulse is?
Well, at least we've confirmed that Michael hasn't the faintest clue how neurons actually work.
When you get it to "work" without the flow of electrons, you let me know.
All neurons are electrically excitable, maintaining voltage gradients across their membranes by means of metabolically driven ion pumps, which combine with ion channels embedded in the membrane to generate intracellular-versus-extracellular concentration differences of ions such as sodium, potassium, chloride, and calcium. Changes in the cross-membrane voltage can alter the function of voltage-dependent ion channels. If the voltage changes by a large enough amount, an all-or-none electrochemical pulse called an action potential is generated, which travels rapidly along the cell's axon, and activates synaptic connections with other cells when it arrives.
All neurons are electrically excitable, maintaining voltage gradients across their membranes by means of metabolically driven ion pumps, which combine with ion channels embedded in the membrane to generate intracellular-versus-extracellular concentration differences of ions such as sodium, potassium, chloride, and calcium. Changes in the cross-membrane voltage can alter the function of voltage-dependent ion channels. If the voltage changes by a large enough amount, an all-or-none electrochemical pulse called an action potential is generated, which travels rapidly along the cell's axon, and activates synaptic connections with other cells when it arrives.
The pulse is an action potential, not a current. There is no current along a conductor, only the movement of ions through gated protein channels. This is completely unlike currents along wires or the structures you are pointing to. You are seeing bunnies in clouds.
Voltage gating, action potentials, nodes of Ranvier? None of this rings a bell? Maybe you could have taken a basic physiology or neuroscience course before presuming to pontificate on something you don't have any familiarity with.
Voltage gating? How did you intend to claim that it's not an electrically active process if it involves voltage gating?
Why do they discuss current? Get real.From crystallographic structural studies of a potassium channel, assuming that this structure remains intact in the corresponding plasma membrane, it is possible to surmise that when a potential difference is introduced over the membrane, the associated electromagnetic field induces a conformational change in the potassium channel. The conformational change distorts the shape of the channel proteins sufficiently such that the cavity, or channel, opens to admit ion influx or efflux to occur across the membrane, down its electrochemical gradient. This subsequently generates an electrical current sufficient to depolarise the cell membrane.
Voltage gating? How did you intend to claim that it's not an electrically active process if it involves voltage gating?
Why do they discuss current? Are you even for real?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?