Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The earth is slowing down, just very slowly.
Yah sure, if you say so. I notice even a top spinning in simple air friction and only touching on one point won't spin for 4+ billion years. You just go right ahead believing in planetary core perpetual motion machines. Best of luck to you in your pseudoscience!
You don't think the rotation of the Earth might be helping it along at all?
Woo!Not any more than the rotation of the winds on Venus has increased from 186 mph to over 249 mph in 6 years, yet the planet has not increased in rotational speed. Coincidentally with global climate change.
Venus' howling winds inexplicably get stronger - NBC News.com
Which coincides with the unexplainable (to them) source of energy being pumped into our atmosphere. Venus winds increasing, Earth storms increasing, a new source of energy detected, shall we call it what it is, a Birkeland current connecting Sun and earth?
NASA Spacecraft Make New Discoveries about Northern Lights - NASA Science
Birkeland current - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That the further from the Sun one goes, the higher the winds become.
The Planet Neptune
And what is helping the earth to keep its rotational speed if it has a core rotating at a different speed? friction is friction. You DO NOT get faster rotation from a slower rotating body providing that rotation. An internal core could never rotate faster than the outer core if the outer core was imparting the momentum. I am sorry, but force does not work that way, regardless that you might want it to. It is called the Laws of Cause and Effect and the effect must be proportional to the cause. A constant one mph force applied to your car will not make this car move 2 mph, ever. it is called friction and drag coefficients.
The earth spins at 1070 mph, winds rarely above an average of 11 mph. Venus rotates at about 4 mph, yet has constant winds up to 249 mph. There is no way to tie rotation speeds of atmospheres to heat from the Sun or the planets rotation. The furthest planets have the highest wind speeds, so something besides rotation of the planet and heat from the Sun is driving these winds. Simple fact.
And since you have never actually observed the core of the Earth, or any planet for that matter, on what *fact* do you base it is rotating differentially from the planet? You may choose to *believe* it does contrary to perpetual motion mechanics if you want, that is your misinterpretation of science, not mine.
That new energy source you have discovered is an electrical connection between Sun and earth, heating the earth's core through the simple and well known force of electromagnetic induction and causing the earth's rotation.
Electromagnetic induction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Induction heating - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Electromotive force - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As orbits are caused by this force.
Charged Particle in a Magnetic Field
The basis of the Lorentz Force.
The Lorentz Force
There is nothing mysterious about it, just simple electromagnetic force laws. No Fairie Dust need be applied.
Woo!
I'm sorry that reality isn't interesting enough for you. It's not my fault though.That's about your best answer to the problem, woo, because you have no solution to the problem that does not defy every scientific fact known. But that's ok, I know all of you believe in perpetual motion despite it's scientific impossibility without an outside force causing that rotation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
What is your cause? Well, ummm, its you see, ummm, well, the dust just started to rotate for some unknown reason. In every solar system, in every galaxy. A gravitational force which pulls equally from all directions does not impart rotational momentum.
grow up and learn some science for a change instead of using fairy dust to explain the universe.
Woo, such a factual denial. It's called avoidance, put the View Master down please.
Explain to me how the earth's core continues to rotate after 4+ billion years against friction. I would like to hear that explanation???
Oh, sorry, you already did. Woo.
I'm sorry that reality isn't interesting enough for you. It's not my fault though.
The "Electric Universe" has interesting physics about nature and the cosmos, but it is still Naturalism. It is a knowledge and view of the physical realm, and is distinctly different from the spiritual world.
Confusing componenys of the natural realm for aspects of the spiritual realm can occur and introduce error. Having its foundational premise from not understanding and knowing the spiritual realm to begin with. Missing the spiritual realm in our midst some may claim something natural to be spiritual, which introduces confusion and error.
You are out to prove there is no existence above and beyond the physical.
For you it's just never going to be there.
The "based on what" and the "demonstrate to us" I mentioned earlier requires going to the Source,
the Creator of all that we see and know. God is Spirit. God is above the natural. God is eternal, not of elements. His knowledge of you this moment and every moment is not shallow but as high as the farthest galaxies. He knows every detail about you. Every moment. HE IS THE ONE TO TURN TO, NOT WORDS OF MEN.
To then tell these Spirit taught individuals that God does not exist reveals clear unawareness of the higher life in our midst. How people can come up empty handed about the Spiritual Realm through Naturalism.
And yet I do not see energy as distinct from the natural world. I do not consider energy to be spiritual at all. Nor do I believe that this electrical activity in our brains is in any way different than that which courses amongst the universe and is a part of all things. This same energy that binds the atom, that makes us up. This same energy that is making it possible for us to have this discussion. So I guess it all depends on what you believe is spiritual about it? I see no conflict, mind is mind, whatever the scale.
Well, for starters, the electrical activity in our brains is biochemically generated charges and the energy binding atoms is strong nuclear force which isn't in any way electrical. So completely different forces right there lawl.
Well, for starters, the electrical activity in our brains is biochemically generated charges and the energy binding atoms is strong nuclear force which isn't in any way electrical. So completely different forces right there lawl.
The New York Times > Science > Image > Graphic: Separated at Birth?
SCIENCE ILLUSTRATED - They Look Alike, but There's a Little Matter of Size - NYTimes.com
The binding forces of atoms in space would be the same as they are here on Earth (whatever the strong force might be). There's no difference there. The current generation process might occur differently in spacetime than in our bodies, but the net result of that current generation in space are "structures" that resemble the structures and functions of a neuron, albeit on a much larger scale.
FYI, I responded in full in the Empirical Theory of God thread for you. I'll keep this thread focused on the topic.
2008 | Universe shines twice as bright | University of St Andrews
Even *if* we didn't discover that light *is more scattered* than the mainstream 'predicted', it wouldn't support your *supernatural* constructs!
The fact you can falsify some other theory does not provide support for your claims *empirically*.
You're still using a blatant double standard.
In one instance you wish empirical cause/effect justification for the link between "awareness" and "God". On the other hand you require no cause/effect justification for you cosmology beliefs. Hypocrisy much?
Science isn't limited to pure naturalism, and neither is the topic of God. Even your expectation of experimental support for God is dubious, since you personally don't require that from other fields of 'science'.
Seeing a bunny in a cloud does not make the cloud into a bunny.
That is a flat out lie. I have presented empirical evidence to support the claims as have others which can all be seen in the other thread:
The New York Times > Science > Image > Graphic: Separated at Birth?
SCIENCE ILLUSTRATED - They Look Alike, but There's a Little Matter of Size - NYTimes.com
The binding forces of atoms in space would be the same as they are here on Earth (whatever the strong force might be). There's no difference there. The current generation process might occur differently in spacetime than in our bodies, but the net result of that current generation in space are "structures" that resemble the structures and functions of a neuron, albeit on a much larger scale.
And there is no Strong Nuclear Force, which as soon as I get home I will gladly prove to you. By your own science!
It's a current carrying structure and it's structured like a brain.
You're one to talk. You can't even *see* your invisible bunnies in the sky.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?