E
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
ethos said:All or most of the membership of this forum are truly interested in one thing; Fellowship with other Christains, and I for one will do my best to seek this goal. Maybe we all should back off a little and embrace each other in christain love, I'm certain we can reconcile some of the differences of opinion we have if we will all remember that our Lord is the Master, and we as his children should first consider the example of his love for each of us. Let's do our best to follow this example, remember that a soft answer turns away wrath.
Vance said:As Augustine said:
In essentials, unity.
In non-essentials, liberty.
In all things, love.
Since most seem to agree that how you believe about origins is one of the non-essentials, we should always treat the subject accordingly. It is still worth discussing and debating, just we should not treat it as a matter of dogma for fear of it becoming a stumbling-block to those on either side.
from: http://www.mountainretreatorg.net/faq/glossary.html#adiaphoraAdiaphora
Adiaphora is a Greek word [adiaphora] literally, [a] meaning not, and [diaphora] meaning different. It implies an indifference by not really being against whatever is in view. In a theological debate or discussion, it means a matter of moral indifference, or that which has neither moral merit, nor which lacks moral merit. i.e., that regarded as something which is tolerable. For example, doctrines which are neither explicitly condemned by scripture, nor explicity stipulated. Often used in connection with religious tolorance of what is sometimes called, 'the non-essentials.'
I am totally committed to the Creationist view point. I find it rather disturbing however that you could feel free to make such a remark. When we all stand before the Lord in Glory, you may find that the one standing next to you believed in evolution. Even though I disagree with the evolutionist view, I believe that all who accept the Lord as Savior, will stand with me in Glory.mhess13 said:I have no desire for fellowship with evolutionists.
ethos said:I am totally committed to the Creationist view point. I find it rather disturbing however that you could feel free to make such a remark. When we all stand before the Lord in Glory, you may find that the one standing next to you believed in evolution. Even though I disagree with the evolutionist view, I believe that all who accept the Lord as Savior, will stand with me in Glory.
Are we not commanded to seperate ourselves from those who teach false doctrine?ethos said:I am totally committed to the Creationist view point. I find it rather disturbing however that you could feel free to make such a remark. When we all stand before the Lord in Glory, you may find that the one standing next to you believed in evolution. Even though I disagree with the evolutionist view, I believe that all who accept the Lord as Savior, will stand with me in Glory.
mhess13 said:Are we not commanded to seperate ourselves from those who teach false doctrine?
Ephesians 5:11 ". . . have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them."
Evolution is positively anti-biblical, and I cannot fellowship with anyone who teaches evolution, just as I won't fellowship with anyone who doesn't believe in the virgin birth, I won't fellowship with those who believe abortion and homosexuality are ok, etc
We do Christ a diservice with all this "I'm ok, you're ok, it doesn't matter what we believe" garbage.
mhess13 said:I have no desire for fellowship with evolutionists.
When you have people who TEACH evolution is ok (like you and Vance) once it's out in the open, I would not have fellowship with them.rmwilliamsll said:the problem is the boundary line.
1. how to determine it
2. how to codify it
3. how to enforce it
4. how to change it over time
i've been reading for several months on the issues here and don't see a solution. in fact, i don't believe most Christians even realize how big of a problem it really is.
creedalism>confessionalism>subscriptionism
....
mhess13 said:Are we not commanded to seperate ourselves from those who teach false doctrine?
Ephesians 5:11 ". . . have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them."
mhess13 said:Evolution is positively anti-biblical, and I cannot fellowship with anyone who teaches evolution, just as I won't fellowship with anyone who doesn't believe in the virgin birth, I won't fellowship with those who believe abortion and homosexuality are ok, etc
mhess13 said:We do Christ a diservice with all this "I'm ok, you're ok, it doesn't matter what we believe" garbage.
No disagreement here. That is what I'm saying when I say do not desire fellowship with evolutionists. It doesn't mean I don't love them, but I cannot embrace people who embrace an entirely anti-biblical theory. So I let them be. Just as I let people be who go to churches that ordain homosexuals.SBG said:I agree here again. We shouldn't be saying it is ok, but rather pointing to what God's Word says. But we cannot force someone to believe as we do, and if that seems the only alternative, then we should just leave them be and still love them.
Hahaha! It's always hess bashing around here! But I can take it, I have a thick skin.SBG said:Ok, this is not to be a mhess bashing either! Saying he has the least-like Christian attitude does nothing to solve anything. I have seen him make statements that are very much from a loving Christian. It would have been better just to leave it alone.
We are to correct each other, BUT we are to uplift one another as well.
As mhess said, he does love those who don't believe as he does. If we do not take him for his word here then we are giving false testimony against him.
And I agree mhess doctrine does matter. I too would not attend a church where the pastor is a homosexual, and I cannot attend a church where a woman is the pastor. I believe these go against the teachings within the Bible. I will not share in their beliefs.
So UGLY that it's cute! That's a face only a mother can love!SBG said:That is such cute dog!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?