- Oct 18, 2014
- 3,525
- 2,427
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Uh, no. He got fired, scrutinized and his marriage damaged because he's a child molester and adulterer.It's funny how this man gets scrutinized, fired, and his marriage put at stake because he spoke out against homosexuality- people sit there and talk about what a hypocrite he is and this, that and the other..
..but the same thing is liable to happen to pretty much anyone with an opinion against homosexuality. The ChikFila incident is a perfect example.
Uh, no. He got fired, scrutinized and his marriage damaged because he's a child molester and adulterer.
Nope, it's not textbook defamation, because it's true. Defamation (slander/libel) is only applicable if the claims are false. I find it deeply disturbing that you're defending this man for such atrocities, just because he also hates gays.Which is none of anyone's business. It's textbook defamation, which is what those like yourself charged against him in the first place. You don't bat an eye when anyone on the liberal end run off and do something ridiculous, though.
Left wingers need to take 'hypocrisy' out of their vocabulary.
Nope, it's not textbook defamation, because it's true. Defamation (slander/libel) is only applicable if the claims are false. I find it deeply disturbing that you're defending this man for such atrocities, just because he also hates gays.
It's funny how this man gets scrutinized, fired, and his marriage put at stake because he spoke out against homosexuality- people sit there and talk about what a hypocrite he is and this, that and the other..
..but the same thing is liable to happen to pretty much anyone with an opinion against homosexuality. The ChikFila incident is a perfect example.
This is why this country is going down south. Does it bother anyone at all that there is literally a specialty group for every single person except white men, or that political correctness is essentially a straight up force field against facts?
And it seems to me like the more the left teaches tolerance, the more intolerant they themselves become. That is, all the specialty groups are collectively hypocritical.. even in calling another a hypocrite.
Considering he diddled his sisters, including one that was only 5 years old...tried to hold himself up as a paragon of virtue...I'd say he's a hypocrite to the nth degree. Heck, I'm a latina, liberal, professional woman who has managed to keep her pants on, stay married, go to school and stay off nasty websites.
He might be against homosexuality, but evidently he has no problems forgetting about that "forsaking all others" part of his marriage vows. How on earth can you defend this scumbag?
By definition of his name? Do you know what the word Satan means?Damaging someone's reputation for a long past sin, and then getting involved with his marriage- It is a blatant attempt at sabotaging a man's life altogether.
I find that deeply disturbing. It's what Satan does, by the very definition of his name. And here's a bunch of Christians doing it, and all in the name of defending sin at that.
Damaging someone's reputation for a long past sin, and then getting involved with his marriage- It is a blatant attempt at sabotaging a man's life altogether.
I find that deeply disturbing. It's what Satan does, by the very definition of his name. And here's a bunch of Christians doing it, and all in the name of defending sin at that.
By definition of his name? Do you know what the word Satan means?
Being the accuser has nothing to do with sabotaging someone's life. He sabotaged his own life with his horrible actions.Yes, it means Accuser; Adversary.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?