Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Supernatural selection can create new species. Natural selection is just as limited as artificial selection but supernatural selection has no such limits. Supernatural selection gets it's power from the sun.Selection cannot create new species but random mutations and interbreeding can do that. As was said many times, natural selection chooses the fittest variation to survive, not create a new variation.
Supernatural selection can create new species. Natural selection is just as limited as artificial selection but supernatural selection has no such limits. Supernatural selection gets it's power from the sun.
the whole foundation of the theory is evolution. They show many many many examples of evolution in process and make it seem to prove the theory of evolution. there is a huge difference form the theory of evolution and just plain old evolution. I dont believe there is any biological evidence to prove the theory. they use the fact of evolution combined with natural science or old age earth. combine the two and create the theory.
What evolution cannot explain among many other things is an ultimate cause.
Selection cannot create new species but random mutations and interbreeding can do that.
As was said many times, natural selection chooses the fittest variation to survive, not create a new variation.
Hi there Evolutionists
I'm curious if you can provide a positive proof for evolution that does not require any assumptions (Especially unprovable, unobservable ones), does not violate laws of logic and can be tested, observed and repeated in test conditions....
Cheers
T
Supernatural selection can create new species. Natural selection is just as limited as artificial selection but supernatural selection has no such limits. Supernatural selection gets it's power from the sun.
"But this is just one experiment under admittedly contrived conditions. “What remains to be seen for me is how relevant is it to actual transitions to multicellularity,” said Srivastava.
Indeed, the authors of the PNAS study admit that selecting for yeast cells or clusters that settled most quickly isn’t exactly a “natural” selection pressure. "
Evolving Multicellularity | The Scientist
Shaking yeast like mad every 24 hours causing the daughter cells stick to the parent cell isn't exactly natural. This is the same when building the basic building blocks of life as there's no doubt man can produce them in the lab using artificial means.
Like I wrote before all the evidence depends on the person dogmatically believing evolution happen.I know. What was your point? Whether or not it accurately represents primordial conditions doesn't change that evolution occurred. Obviously, developing a theoretical model for how it happened historically is the next step.
Like I wrote before all the evidence depends on the person dogmatically believing evolution happen.
Like I wrote before all the evidence depends on the person dogmatically believing evolution happen.
Many genotypes of S. cerevisiae aggregate into biofilm-like clusters of cells, termed “flocs,” by producing adhesive glycoproteins in their cell walls (25), but we found that snowflake-phenotype yeast do not arise from floc-type aggregation. Individual cells, obtained by enzymatic digestion of snowflake clusters, were tracked via microscopy for 16 h of growth (Movie S1). During this time each cell was seen to give rise to a new snowflake-type cluster, whereas aggregation was never seen, demonstrating that clusters arise via postdivision adhesion and not by aggregation of previously separate cells. Cell adhesion sites were identified by calcofluor staining, which preferentially stains yeast bud scars, confirming that the
group of cells making up the snowflake phenotype arises via successive divisions of component cells (Fig. 2B). Snowflake yeast are also phenotypically stable: we transferred three replicate populations of snowflake yeast (drawn from replicate population 1, day 30, of our first evolution experiment) 35 times without gravitational selection and did not detect invasion by any unicellular strains.
Are you trying to tell me evolutionist don't make dogmatic claims? I read them all the time.Nope, the whole reason I'm now an evolutionist is because I looked at the facts with an open and questioning mind, it was dogmatism that was keeping me as a YEC/OEC a dogma that I questioned and I'm pretty sure most evolutionists that used to be creationists would also tell of a similar tale.
I should have wrote they used centrifugal force instead of shaking. Also it seems the cluster were less fit which is going in the wrong direction. Yeast is already been known to colonist together.Incidentally, your claim in a previous post that all they did was shake the specimen and cause cells to stick together is incorrect. They specifically tested for that.
Hi there Evolutionists
I'm curious if you can provide a positive proof for evolution that does not require any assumptions (Especially unprovable, unobservable ones), does not violate laws of logic and can be tested, observed and repeated in test conditions....
Cheers
T
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?