Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then let me educate you. Energy can be felt. Macro evolution is something that can't be seen, felt, or tested. You cannot test or observe something that apparently takes millions or billions of years. That's called blind faith. There's nothing scientific about it whatsoever.
It's called logic.
We know that tigers, lions, cats ... descended from a common ancestor. If we regress this further, this mean the cat's common ancestor will have siblings that will give rise to other species. That means there will be an ancestor to these siblings as well. Rinse, spit and repeat enough we will get to a common ancestor of all species.
What you're describing is micro evolution. That's what evolutionists always mix up to confuse people.
There are different varieties of dogs, yet they are all dogs nonetheless.
Each animal produces after its own kind.
Don't confuse micro with macro.
You heard it here first - the study of energy is not real science; forensics is not real science (you never answered LoAmmi's question, by the way); archaeology and paleontology is not real science; gravity is not real science... what am I forgetting?
There have been posts and links that prove he's wrong, I posted a video that proves he's wrong. Proof, proof, proof, proof, proof. He's not worth your time.
Right, the hundreds of thousands of scientists who dedicate their life to the study of evolution are all mixed up.
ViaCrucis answered this for you already.
"Kind" is not a scientific word. It's used in the Bible and used by creationists.
As has been explained, many times: there is no differentiation of the two. Microevolution+time=macroevolution
Seems the discussion turned in to ganging up against opponents and personal attacks .
Theory Evolution (Of species from common ancestor(s)) cannot be explained strictly by Scientific method in the absence of Measurable evidence.
From wikipedia :
The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.[1] To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.
Theory of evolution in biology is akin to "String theory " in physics with regards to absence of Testable data .
It is apparent that none of the people in this thread have any scientific credentials to argue forcefully in favor or against "the Theory " .
Directly from the horse's mouth: He will not accept evidence.I won't accept it because I don't believe it is evidence. I studied this before I became a Christian. I was passionate for truth. I wasn't prepared to give my life to God if I thought that we had all evolved. I have being 100% open minded and researched the "evidence" but it was more speculation and assumption than evidence.
Yes there is a difference. Macro evolution has never been proven or observed. Nor is it scientific.
Your imaginary-fish-gives-birth-to-a-dog macro-evolution does not exist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?