Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wonderfulcross said:You think that all of the earth's scientists believe in evolution???
There are thousands (25,000) of scientists around the world that think evolution is impossible. That number is growing daily as the flaws of evolution and truths of Creationism are revealed.
Wonderfulcross said:You think that all of the earth's scientists believe in evolution???
There are thousands (25,000) of scientists around the world that think evolution is impossible. That number is growing daily as the flaws of evolution and truths of Creationism are revealed.
pastorob said:I am new to this forum, but from what I have seen, all of the arguments regarding evoloution are old and tired and frankly, Not even good science.
The latest scientific information regarding DNA, verses Evoloutionary theory, is that under the constraints of Evoloution, DNA, being Digital Code, invalidates all Evoloutionary theory. Since DNA is Coded information about how matter is to be constructed, it is impossible that DNA could occur naturally. All Good Scientists know that Digital Code comes from an intelligent source, not by random selection. Anyway, I have taught this subjest for 20 + years and have over 1,000 hours of lectures on the subject. I look forward to any intelligent interaction with well informed challengers, if you dare!
Lithium Hobo said:What truth would that be? That it's true because you said so? Sorry, but your arguement is stale and bland.
Wonderfulcross said:It's not because I say so. It's a statistic.
And what argument are you refering to?
notto said:Wow, you have some great information. Can you provide us a source for this amazing fact? How was it determined? Where is it documented?
Can you name 3 that have abandoned evolution for creationism in the last year? I mean if it is growing daily, that should be easy.
Wonderfulcross said:There is a book titled,In Six Days. Most of the scientists in there used to be evolutionists.
Dr. James S. Allan-Genetics
Dr. Jobe Martin- not in this book- biologists
Dr. Bob Hoskin-Biochemistry
Dr. Henry Zuill-Biology
you were right, that was easy.
Wonderfulcross said:There is a book titled,In Six Days. Most of the scientists in there used to be evolutionists.
Dr. James S. Allan-Genetics
Dr. Jobe Martin- not in this book- biologists
Dr. Bob Hoskin-Biochemistry
Dr. Henry Zuill-Biology
you were right, that was easy.
I must admit that the six days of the creation presented some difficulty for me. The apparent logic of conclusions from observations and measurements in various fields of science had previously led me to doubt the little I had known of the Word of God, to the extent that I had agreed with attempts to replace it with an alternative concept of time. But God does not say eons or years or months or weeksHe says days, and we generally understand days to be 24-hour periods.
I then realized that had God wanted to say a billion years rather than six days, He could have said it, very simply, in the way He spoke to Abraham: I will make your offspring like the dust of the earth, so that if anyone could count the dust, then your offspring could be counted (Gen. 13:16). In the same way He could have said, I took as many years as there are particles of dust on the earth to create the heavens, the earth, the seas, and all that is in them and it would have sounded very impressive but He said six days. Would He have said this if it were of no concern?
I now believe that God means literally what He says and writes, and that there is no reason to look for symbolism. The word day is used so often and with such a clear implication of being a normal 24-hour period that to interpret it otherwise requires, to my mind, an unbelievable stretch of the imagination. (See also Jer. 33:20.)
Wonderfulcross said:Are you sure Jobe Martin is a scientist? I think he is a minister like Chuck.
Lithium Hobo said:That creationism has more to stand on than evolution and that more and more scientists are supporting creationism.
As everyone knows, the tide is rising at a rapid rate. When it rises, land disappears. Just 300 years ago, at the rate it is rising, the earth would have no water at all.Wonderfulcross said:*Everyone knows that the earth's magnetic field is decaying at a rapid rate. When it decays, it transfers to heat. Just 25,000 years ago, at the rate it was decaying, the earth would have been frying at 5,000 degrees.
Why stop at a few thousand years? As everyone knows, rabbits can give birth at 3months of age with a litter of 4-12 after a one month gestation period. Based on the number of rabbits we see, the earth can not be more than 100 years old.*There would be way too many humans on the earth if our ancestors started appearing 1-2 millioj years ago. The human birth rate is at 0.6 percent. Combined with the early appearence of our ancestors, there would be about 4 trillion humans on earth.(In Six Days) If we started a few thousand years ago, we would have about 8 billion.
Wonderfulcross said:2. document 1 flaw of evolution so that we can have something substantial to discuss. otherwise the thread is nothing but unsupported assertation and poor understanding of the data.
Where would the DNA in the first cell (or any living organism) get the blueprints to construct new structures? DNA only has information that makes the organism function with what it already has. It has been proven that DNA can't obtain foreign information. So where did that information come from?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?