Bearing in mind there were at least 7 named giving an opinion on Buenos airies across 3 continents (others scientists still , later involved in mitochondrial testing of white cells) . Various genetic labs too.
So there are 5 phenomena , 4 Eucharistic + Cochabamba.
More if you count sudarium ( edices had several ) + lanciano on top.
Then it would be surprising if less than 20 were involved total.
Even if it were 10 does it matter?
Same results declared in multipl locations. Multiple people. No dissenting views.
Not a single scientist conjectured fraud, or false analysis , of those who looked at the samples. You could name most of them if you ever bothered to look in free videos and sites. But you never will.
There were of course the usual sceptic idiots , like the dean of Bialystok declaring sokolka red mould, having never actually seen the samples or the slides. That is how sceptics and CF behave.
Others like stuttgart refused to test it because they were frightened it might be real, when they heard what the sample was!
Of the posters here I respected you until the day you quoted skepdic , the least scientific site on the web, if that’s how far the level of debate has sunk, no point in discussing it more. Keep closing your eyes and reading skepdic, It’s easier than science.