Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Mountainmike also could not be bothered to provide the evidence he says he has. Claims are not evidence.I Can’t be bothered with the Sophistry on this forum any more.
Firstly, that's a different claim - you said, "Nobody has a clue how it is possible to fake them."Of course it is reasonable.
Pathologists state unequivocally, the white cells should not exist in vitro after hours. But they did.
This is incorrect - blood clots on exposure to air or external surfaces. In fact, it's hard to stop it clotting outside the body (silicone containers will delay it).They state blood can’t clot ex vivo.
So stop posting it.I Can’t be bothered with the Sophistry on this forum any more.
The problem is that without the original source we have no way of knowing if you're simply paraphrasing, exaggerating, or misinterpreting what the authors actually said or claimed. Until you provide us with some sort of corroborating evidence they're simply your claims.Pathologists state unequivocally , the white cells should not exist in vitro after hours. But they did.
They state blood can’t clot ex vivo. But it has on a statue.
Human tissue with DNA and recently living should sequence, it didn’t.
Let me get this straight...are you saying that humans aren't wise?Labeling themselves to be wise, they became fools.
I'm saying that humans that label themselves "wise" run the risk of later becoming atheists.Let me get this straight...are you saying that humans aren't wise?
So you're saying that if they agree with you then they're wise, but if they don't then they're not?I'm saying that humans that label themselves "wise" run the risk of later becoming atheists.
Here's where I got into it with Thaumaturgy and Split Rock:So you're saying that if they agree with you then they're wise, but if they don't then they're not?
I'd say, (in that hypothetical), that humans labelling themselves as 'wise', (which is a rarity from my experience), have missed the understanding of the concept of wisdom. Some might just call that ignorance rather than wisdom.I'm saying that humans that label themselves "wise" run the risk of later becoming atheists.
Firstly, that's a different claim - you said, "Nobody has a clue how it is possible to fake them."
Secondly, a few pathologists aren't everybody.
Thirdly, white blood cells can be isolated from forensic blood samples many hours after the crime.
This is incorrect - blood clots on exposure to air or external surfaces. In fact, it's hard to stop it clotting outside the body (silicone containers will delay it).
The reported claims of these pathologists appear to be extremely unreliable. This doesn't help your case.
So stop posting it.
Oh, it's dozens now... so you say, but you can't or won't provide any substantiating evidence ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Dozens of pathologists have seen them, that’s what they think.
I'm saying that humans that label themselves "wise" run the risk of later becoming atheists.
QV please: Pascal's wagerIt's a risk worth taking.
QV please: Pascal's wager
I pray you change your mind before it's too late.Pascal's wager is ill-formed and pointless. It's built on false premises.
I pray you change your mind before it's too late.
Too late!Don't bother. Save your efforts for something less futile.
By a few pathologists, you mean all of the tens involved in multiple investigations. No dissenting voices.
It's been rounded up to dozens now: "Dozens of pathologists have seen them..."You going to name them? Or actually present their work?
It's been rounded up to dozens now: "Dozens of pathologists have seen them..."
Where is the evidence? These are just claims.Bearing in mind there were at least 7 named giving an opinion on Buenos airies across 3 continents (others scientists still , later involved in mitochondrial testing of white cells) . Various genetic labs too.
So there are 5 phenomena , 4 Eucharistic + Cochabamba.
More if you count sudarium ( edices had several ) + lanciano on top.
Then it would be surprising if less than 20 were involved total.
Even if it were 10 does it matter?
Same results declared in multipl locations. Multiple people. No dissenting views.
Non of this is good evidence for your claim.Not a single scientist conjectured fraud, or false analysis , of those who looked at the samples. You could name most of them if you ever bothered to look in free videos and sites. But you never will.
There were of course the usual sceptic idiots , like the dean of Bialystok declaring sokolka red mould, having never actually seen the samples or the slides. That is how sceptics and CF behave.
Others like stuttgart refused to test it because they were frightened it might be real, when they heard what the sample was!
This is the third time you said you were done posting on this thread....no point in discussing it more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?