- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,754
- 52,544
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I wouldn't know. I'm not the writer.
At least it's good when you admit that you're quote mining.
Would you like me to copy-and-paste the entire article?
This person, that being me, totally rejects what I see as the hocus pocus explanation for not only life on this earth but also the whole of the cosmos.
So do I.
I'm not a scientist.
So I'm not obligated to refer to creatio ex nihilo as "hocus pocus".
Or "false" ... or "myth" ... or a "non-event" ... or "lacking evidence" ... or anything else negative.
Scientists created their own set of standards before they take something seriously enough.
Then call us Christians out when we don't accept their standards.
Science can take a hike.
First we find some nothing, then we look for something to happen. So far we don't have any "nothing".Would you even know what to look for?
At the most, providing a link, since doing so would be inline with the forum's statement of purpose:
They cannot know but pretend to know better than God. This smells like blind hubris.
Will do:
Your persecution complex is showing again...
First we find some nothing, then we look for something to happen. So far we don't have any "nothing".
It just makes things a lot clearer. Good job.
Oh, sorry.
They call the Jews out as "ancient, goat herding, desert nomads".
But they conveniently leave out how those Jews got into the desert in the first place, don't they?
I'm glad you're happy now.
Also, it's historians who would say that, not scientists.
So any scientist who says it is saying it off the record?
And this site must have a lot of historians then, eh?
In light of the last thread that got shut down because the OP repeatedly refused to provide sources when asked, thought it best to bring it up in case the mods get... twitchy.
Now we're getting a rewrite of Don Quixote where anyone who has commentary different to yours is a 'scientist' now.
I'm not going to go back in this site and dig up the many non-historians that have used that phrase.
You said it was historians who would say that.
I say anyone can (and has) said it.
Maybe some historian originated it; but now it seems to be a favorite for many.
And?
And so I'll take any "persecution complex" remarks with a grain of salt.
Are you so sure? Think about it.The theory of evolution is biology. Nothing about physics, chemistry, geology, etc., would be compromised in the slightest if it was "disproven".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?