Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just as a side note - the word for "faith" in that passage is a different word with different connotations than the word we normally think of as "faith" throughout the New Testament.
Thanks. However, I was more focusing on the 'could not' portion of that passage.
Don't agree Jim. I think of it as He healed when He chose to. But absolutely, He followed the direction of the Father.
Even Jesus did not heal at will
Then Jesus answered and said to them, Most assuredly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He sees the Father do; for whatever He does, the Son also does in like manner. (John 5.19)
What do you think?
~Jim
I would rather defend to the death your right to say stupid stuff than to have to listen to it.
Thankfully our Lord doesn't violate us, so if we say to Him that we don't want healing then I suppose we won't be forced to receive it, but goodness, why oh why would we do that???
I do not believe when looking at our Father to see his nature, that we would ever be given the compassion to pray for someones healing, when someone has asked you to pray, and having to say...wait...I just checked with my Father, He's not healing you or extending any compassion, so the answer is no. That is leterally what is being implied here. When Jesus saw what His Father was doing was showing compassion and willingness to heal.
You know, when I read this, I read it as if the Father is Christ's example. Consider Paul when he said, I am imitating Christ. This seems to me to be a similar thing, Christ saying I am imitating the Father. The Father then is all about Love is He not? So the imitation is one of Love and accepting the authority of God.Even Jesus did not heal at will
Then Jesus answered and said to them, Most assuredly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He sees the Father do; for whatever He does, the Son also does in like manner. (John 5.19)What do you think?
~Jim
I would rather defend to the death your right to say stupid stuff than to have to listen to it.
Let's look at this a moment. We have a "friend" who is an alcoholic, usually homeless because of alcohol. He has gone to several churches for healing. He believes he is healed, and yet he stays sober for only a few weeks at best ususally more like a day or two. The alcohol is literally killing him. So we have people requesting to God that he be healed. We have him believing in that healing. We have him confessing that healing. Why isn't he healed? Or would you consider him healed even though he is still an alcoholic? What is the missing ingredient?I do not believe when looking at our Father to see his nature, that we would ever be given the compassion to pray for someones healing, when someone has asked you to pray, and having to say...wait...I just checked with my Father, He's not healing you or extending any compassion, so the answer is no. That is leterally what is being implied here. When Jesus saw what His Father was doing was showing compassion and willingness to heal.
Let's look at this a moment. We have a "friend" who is an alcoholic, usually homeless because of alcohol. He has gone to several churches for healing. He believes he is healed, and yet he stays sober for only a few weeks at best ususally more like a day or two. The alcohol is literally killing him. So we have people requesting to God that he be healed. We have him believing in that healing. We have him confessing that healing. Why isn't he healed? Or would you consider him healed even though he is still an alcoholic? What is the missing ingredient?
I can think of a few circumstances where I can honestly say I wouldn't desire to be healed.
And yet God does not heal everyone that we pray for. So how does that fit?
To believe that Jesus did not heal at will, you would have to believe that Jesus' will and the Father's will are (or could be) different.
Jesus and the Father (and the Holy Spirit), are ONE. Therefore, they can not have contradictory wills.
So as it pertains to this topic, there was never a time when Jesus wanted to heal someone and the Father didn't, or vice versa.
So as it pertains to this topic, there was never a time when Jesus wanted to heal someone and the Father didn't, or vice versa.
I just can't grasp that at all, can you help me see why you would say that?
Having suffered both emotional and physical pain, at times in extreme measure, I cannot imagine why anybody would ever say, "No healing thanks."
But instead of taking the time and effort to build a close relationship with Father and get to a place that we know His voice and see what He does - we make educated guesses at what is happening, most times not even knowing if something is or is not God's will - we see someone who doesn't get healed and instead of hearing specifically from God on the matter - we just assume that if they didn't get healed, God must not want them to be.
To believe that Jesus did not heal at will, you would have to believe that Jesus' will and the Father's will are (or could be) different.
Jesus and the Father (and the Holy Spirit), are ONE. Therefore, they can not have contradictory wills.
So as it pertains to this topic, there was never a time when Jesus wanted to heal someone and the Father didn't, or vice versa.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?