• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Eusebius the liar?

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
H

hisgrace26

Guest
Eusebius was an early church historian in the early church who lied about passing on false history, or make up their own history skeptic says. For example, in his book Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 8, chapter 2, he qoute:


"We shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity."

Based on this quote it seems like Eusebius introduce his own history (whatever that is) and passing them on to future generations. Skeptics claim that the early church father such as Eusebius made up their own history and passing on false information. Can somebody clarify that to me maybe I am missing the details. What exactly happen and what was his intention? Thanks.
 

CryptoLutheran

Friendly Neighborhood Spiderman
Sep 13, 2010
3,015
391
Pacific Northwest
✟27,709.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Indulging in hyperbole, exaggeration or bias is hardly abnormal for an ancient historian; if Eusebius engaged in such then that's hardly surprising as just about every other historian from antiquity did the same.

That said, I don't see any reason to begin with an a priori assertion that Eusebius lied; that he may have indulged in exaggeration, especially in regard to Constantine (Eusebius was a personal friend and strong supporter of the emperor) would hardly be shocking given his personal relationship with Constantine and the like.

That doesn't make Eusebius' histories utterly unreliable, and last I checked Christianity wasn't dependent upon the histories written by Eusebius of Caesarea.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0
H

hisgrace26

Guest

I don't either. Here is the quote in context:

"But it is not our place to describe the sad misfortunes which finally came upon them, as we do not think it proper, moreover, to record their divisions and unnatural conduct to each other before the persecution. Wherefore we have decided to relate nothing concerning them except the things in which we can vindicate 3 the Divine judgment. Hence weshall not mention those who were shaken by the persecution, nor those who in everything pertaining to salvation were shipwrecked, and by their own will were sunk in the depths of the flood. But we shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be use-fill first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity. (2) Let us therefore proceed to describe briefly the sacred conflicts of the witnesses of the Devine Word."

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.xiii.iii.html

Notice I bold that sentence. What was his intention? At first sight it seems like he is lying about history. Can you clarify?
 
Upvote 0
H

hisgrace26

Guest
Christ's_Warrior said:
Dude, it ain't east trying to understand what someone was thinking all those years ago. Anyone can come to a conclusion but it must be coupled with evidence and note mere heresay.
Click to expand...

Eusebius introduced the events for the first time in history that would benefit the church and then pass on to it's posterity. A history book is view differently from the Bible with skepticism. The Bible is taught as truth.
 
Upvote 0

revanneosl

Mystically signifying since 1985
Feb 25, 2007
5,480
1,479
Northern Illniois
✟47,010.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Eusebius wrote the best history that he could, given the sources he had access to and the fact that the scientific discipline of historiography hadn't been invented yet.

But you must also remember that Eusebius was also a bishop of the Church. His main concern was shepherding souls into heaven. There is no such thing as complete objectivity. All histories are written to make a point. Eusebius' point was that people should believe in Jesus, be baptized, live righteous lives, and go to heaven when they die.
 
Upvote 0

CryptoLutheran

Friendly Neighborhood Spiderman
Sep 13, 2010
3,015
391
Pacific Northwest
✟27,709.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
superman2010 said:
Eusebius introduced the events for the first time in history that would benefit the church and then pass on to it's posterity. A history book is view differently from the Bible with skepticism. The Bible is taught as truth.
Click to expand...

I think you're skewing what he means by "introduce". After doing some digging I was able to find the Greek text of the History (link here is to a pdf), and the relevant line is found at 8.2.3; after trying to amateurishly figure out (and guesswork) I think the word in question is προσθήσομεν (prosthesomen), which (according to here) means something like "to place toward". Could be wrong, but from my complete lack of education in the area could tell it's the only word in the text that would have made sense to translate as "introduce".

In any event, the notion isn't that Eusebius is boldly declaring that he is fabricating something so much as a declaration that he is only dealing with what is relevant for his purposes. In an extensive historical discourse of the Church there would likely be little reason to discuss matters of historical import that are not directly or indirectly important for that discourse and thus he intends to only bring into the conversation that which is relevant for his purpose.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
16,917
4,259
Louisville, Ky
✟1,021,706.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
His intention was not to talk about those who had fallen away because of the extreme persecution that so many early Christians faced because of their faith.

Have you even read what he wrote in Book VIII? Why does he have to write about all those who turned back to paganism?
 
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,358
21,510
Flatland
✟1,095,033.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single

You're suggesting that he commenced his lying with a preface informing everyone that he was going to be lying? That would probably be unique in all history. Kinda defeats the purpose of lying.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

“Helena was visited that emperors might be redeemed." ~ The ancient sources on Saint Helena's discovery of the True Cross
Replies
1
Views
152
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
RileyG
L
Help finding American Church History artifacts.
Replies
0
Views
172
Christian History
LJM14
L
The fascinating history of Catholics and the deaf community
Replies
0
Views
89
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
Michie
Shameless instrumentalization of Cardinal Newman as progressive poster boy
Replies
2
Views
177
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
RileyG
L
American Evangelical History site map
Replies
0
Views
294
Christian History
LJM14
L
Menu
Log in
Register