If you have a court case and you lose the evidence that exonerates, that evidence doesn't you much good, does it?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you have a court case and you lose the evidence that exonerates, that evidence doesn't you much good, does it?It is not worthless for me! I will try to secure a copy from Dr. Erwin Taylor and it might become valuable for you as well.
That's nice.
Now what would you do if you took your grandson in for a haircut and the barber gave him a sucker afterward, and your grandson asked for another one to give to his sister?
Would you explain that's how Jesus intercedes for us?
If so, are you using a real example to explain a real Truth?
"Hayah" is scientific terminology?
I've heard that word before .. in Bruce Lee flicks.
Do I need a Ph.D. in geology in order to post here?
My Ph.D. is in religion, which means I should be allowed discuss origins.
Although, for some reason I feel guilty about my laughing at this comment
LOL
Too funny
dave
Yet they are the apple of scientists' eyes because they agree with them.
In other words, it's not what he says that counts; it's what he is.In other words, you really hate science.
He? Did I miss something. My comment was specifically for you. If science can take a hike, I think that pretty much means you despise it. Hmmm?In other words, it's not what he says that counts; it's what he is.
I'm sure we've been over this before, Rick.He? Did I miss something. My comment was specifically for you. If science can take a hike, I think that pretty much means you despise it. Hmmm?
Trivia question:Every discussion you're ever involved in devolves into you telling reality to take a hike.
I've got an even better trivia question. Can AV actually address the topic of this thread?Trivia question:
How was reality misrepresented in the Aricebo message?
If you wish to believe in a 6,000 year old earth based on faith, I have no issue. My issue is basing those beliefs on false information
You mean interpretation of dating methods? Could you describe what you mean in a bit more detail so I don't misinterpret what you are saying?And my issue is not factual information but rather the interpretation of said information.
If you have a court case and you lose the evidence that exonerates, that evidence doesn't you much good, does it?
Yes, creationists have a habit of woefully misinterpreting factual information. Which is exactly what one would expect when unqualified people try to explain data outside their skill set.And my issue is not factual information but rather the interpretation of said information.
You mean interpretation of dating methods? Could you describe what you mean in a bit more detail so I don't misinterpret what you are saying?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?