Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Elizabeth,elittlebit_curry said:Thank you all so much for your edifying words!
I too have always struggled with what our relationship with the Saints is supposed to be (not that I've had much experience at all; we don't say a whole lot about saints in the Anglican church to which I belong, though we do recognize them), but you (especially through the Early Church Fathers quoted) have heartily convinced me of how wonderful a thing it is.
As long as one remains firmly focused on Christ, I don't see how one could fall into some sort of heretical worship of a saint, especially since they themselves are so firmly rooted in adoration of Him.
Again, thank you!
Elizabeth
So what is the purpose of asking a friend or relative to pray for you if God can hear you? Do you see? By the reasoning above, asking anyone else to pray for you is pointless. Yet we all know it has great value.Daedalus said:Basically I explained how you pray for a friend and how saints do that for you, but he asked me what's the pourpose for that if God can hear you.
We shouldn't pray to Saints because we are ashamed to go directly to God. We should pray to have their help and assistance in our problems and in our happy times and in our worship of God. Just like in the membership of a family. We share all things together.Anyway, I used all sorts of arguments, I even made an analogy -- what if someone that wants your help has done something wrong and is ashamed to come and ask you first came and asked your mother, then you would be more inclined to help him.
The truth is I can't see how that can apply to God.
If your prayer to saints includes worship of them as deity, then that is indeed a sin. However it is no sin to talk to, and share with our fellow members of Christ's body who are in heaven, any of our problems and joys, and even to thank them and praise them.I know we end up with "St. .... pray for me" but I started that only recently (!!!!), I used to pray to saints and the Virgin Mary just as I prayed to God -- that is a sin.
thereselittleflower said:Also, do you think the first Christians would have gotten it all wrong right after Christ?
Look into the Catacoombs . . they are full of thousands of prayers inscribed to those who were martyred . . tons of evidence that this was the faithful teaching of the Apostolic Church . .
Peace in Him!
statrei said:That argument does not hold, Therese. John 21:23 is an undeniable example that the early church got something dreadfully wrong just after Jesus left them. There is no reason to believe that the men who followed Jesus and wrote the Bible were imbued with infallibility of perception.
Darius
You read v. 23 as if it were v. 22. V. 23 clearly shows that the early church misapplied the statement that meant, "what's it to you," to mean "John will not die." It is easy to determine approximately when that new teaching was developed because Paul did not use it when he wrote 1 Thess.Iacobus said:How is John 21:23 proof that anything went wrong? Is it because John died before the second coming? Read verses 23 and 24 carefully. Essentially, what Jesus was saying was "what's it to you?"
More troubling, however, is the logical conclusion of your argument, which is that Christianity wandered aimlessly and blindly and in error from the very time Christ ascended. Have you no faith in the Holy Spirit? If your argument is true, there is no hope for any of us. Christ came to establish His Church, and that Church has been faithfully led in all truth by the Holy Spirit for 2000 years.
James
statrei said:You read v. 23 as if it were v. 22. V. 23 clearly shows that the early church misapplied the statement that meant, "what's it to you," to mean "John will not die." It is easy to determine approximately when that new teaching was developed because Paul did not use it when he wrote 1 Thess.
I do not equate the Holy Spirit to the Church. The Church has the privilege to be an agency of God, but it is not the Holy Spirit. Flaws in the church do not mean there are flaws in God or that the Church is of no use. My car may have a flaw in its engine but I don't discard it on account of that. If the historical record of John 21:23 (which cannot be denied since the elders in Ephesus were quick to add in v. 24 a certificate of authenticity) conflicts with the way you view the church, you man need to revisit your view of the church, not attempt to disregard John's record.
Darius
jeffthefinn said:When I was a Lutheran I would have thought the saints praying for us was just a pipe dream and nothing more, but while still a Lutheran the Blessed Theotokos visited me, and from then on the ties to be a Lutheran were loosed. I mean it blew me away, and the next day I went to Sister Claire an RC nun attached to the Campus Christian Ministry, and told her what had happened, I said such things do not happen to Lutherans. She told me I was blessed, and gave me some books to read. I have never doubted the communion of saints after that.
Jeff the Finn
Anonykat said:Hi Darius!
Thanks for joining us here! I apologize for not being more clear that TAW is not a debate board when I invited you - I guess I didn't think about it. There are many places on this general board where it is allowed, however, if you want to check them out. I hope you'll stick around and hang out with us, too, though!
Katherine
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?