• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does sin require an historical/literal Adam and Eve to exist?

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Does the existence of sin upon humanity require an historical adam and eve sinning against God?

What are your thoughts on this?

Not really, don't get me wrong that's what the New Testament teaches but the fact that you are a sinner isn't an open question. How you came to be a sinner is the important thing here. Otherwise you have all the descendants of Adam having the same choice in effect. That leaves open the possibility that someone is going to choose to do the right thing.

The New Testament teaches that we all sinned in Adam, Romans 5 discusses this in depth. No, I don't honestly believe there has to be a literal, historical Adam in order to believe I'm a sinner. That's just what the Scriptures teach. The theology would have to be arranged somewhat but you still have the same basis even if Genesis is mythic poetry.

It should be understood that Creation is a New Testament doctrine. We understand Creation based on the witness of that Gospel.

Grace and peace,
Mark
 
Upvote 0

ChetSinger

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,518
651
✟132,668.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Does the existence of sin upon humanity require an historical adam and eve sinning against God?

What are your thoughts on this?
I think that's what Paul, in Romans 5, is describing. This is a big quote from it, but I think it's all relevant:

 
Upvote 0

Assyrian

Basically pulling an Obama (Thanks Calminian!)
Mar 31, 2006
14,868
991
Wales
✟42,286.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Does the existence of sin upon humanity require an historical adam and eve sinning against God?

What are your thoughts on this?
The story of Adam and Eve show what we all do sooner or later when faced with temptations, when we have to choose between following God and following our desires. Gen 3:6 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. Eve didn't need original sin to follow her desires instead of obey God. Neither do we. Adam didn't even need to be tempted by his desires, he simply went along with Eve. The story is an indictment of the whole human race because it illustrates so clearly what we are like.

Paul is talking figuratively in Romans 5. Adam's sin and condemnation is a picture of our sin and condemnation, and he uses the story of Adam to contrasts with the redemption we have in Christ. As Paul put it, Rom 5:14 Adam is a figure of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Solider wrote:
Does the existence of sin upon humanity require an historical adam and eve sinning against God?

What are your thoughts on this?

My answer has two parts.

First - in agreement with mark and Assyrian, I don't think our sinful state is dependant on an historical Adam, for the reasons they state.

Second - and just as importantly - a real, historical, single person Adam can be fully consistent with all the findings of science. By accepting reality, we do not have to give up on a real, historical, single person Adam who's sin brought spiritual death on humans and set the stage for salvation through Jesus. Earlier, I wrote:
One common TE position (and the one I hold, along with literally millions of others, including support from the Pope) is that there WAS a literal, first person, Adam. He was a member of a community, and was the first person in the ape to human gradual change. After all, there had to be a first, if there weren't humans 5 million years ago, and there are humans today – he was the first to whom God divinely gave a soul. Understanding how populations interbreed makes it obvious that all humans today are descended from him. Original sin did enter the human race though him, because he was the first to be divinely given a soul by God, and perhaps to be developed to the point of being able to conceptualize God, and hence to be able to rebel against God. The idea of Adam as a real, single, historical person, who brought about original sin, and who is the literal ancestor of all humans alive today, is fully compatible with all of modern science, and an important part, for some, of theistic evolution.
In His love-

-Papias
 
Upvote 0