- Jun 4, 2013
- 10,132
- 996
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
Except we know from genetic DNA testing, and also with actual tests with Russian Red Foxes, that merely selecting for tamability is the cause of variation in dogs.
You need to stop fooling yourself and just accept the truth. They claim mutation takes millions of years, yet over 100 breeds of dogs were produced in a few thousand, and it had nothing to do with mutations.
A Soviet scientist created the only tame foxes in the world
“The process was surprisingly quick. "By intense selective breeding, we have compressed into a few decades an ancient process that originally unfolded over thousands of years," wrote Trut in 1999.
The fox experiment showed that just by selecting for friendliness, all these other changes, including an increase in social skills, happened by accident."
In fact, Belyaev and Trut soon found that it was not just the foxes' personalities that were changing. Their bodies were too.
"The main surprise was that, together with changing of behaviour, many new morphological traits in tame foxes start to appear from the first steps of selection," said Trut.
The domesticated foxes had floppier, drooping ears, which are found in other domestic animals such as dogs, cats, pigs, horses and goats. Curlier tails – also found in dogs and pigs – were also recorded.
All these changes were brought on by selecting for one trait: tameability
What's more, "in only a few generations, the friendly foxes were showing changes in coat colour," says Hare.
The process seems to be ongoing. "At the more advanced steps of selection, changes in the parameters of the skeletal system began to arise," Trut wrote. "They included shortened legs, tail, snout, upper jaw, and widened skull."“
Again, we need no fantasy mutations to explain what in reality happens with interbreeding. Just to accept the facts of reality and stop denying it to uphold one’s outdated and dead beliefs of mutation.
No, what you confuse as mutation is simply selective breeding, but without man directly interfering in the wild, the process can take thousands to millions of years for select traits to be bred into a population. Mutation is useless and you just need to face up to the fact it had no bearing on dogs whatsoever, and relating that to every other animal, no bearing on their selective traits as well. Why evolutionists can’t accept the facts of actual breeding programs with animals is confounding. But then that’s why mutation has been all but abandoned in plant and animal breeding programs, as it was found to produce nothing new after the first few minor changes.
http://www.weloennig.de/Loennig-Long-Version-of-Law-of-Recurrent-Variation.pdf
Not that I expect you to accept the actual results of real experiments with breeding animals, but to only believe the hype and PR your high priests proclaim from their pulpits.
Last edited:
Upvote
0