Well, I'm convinced!
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have an explanation. I did it. I created the entirety of existence, and I did so exactly as it appears in the historical/geological/paleontological record. That's a much better explanation than "God did it" because mine is not open to debate. I did it exactly how it looks like I did it. Show me wrong, I dare you to try.
Well, I'm convinced!How does one convert to Skaloopism? I won't be expected to tithe at all will I?
You have already converted just by asking how to convert! You don't have to tithe, but if you want to, I can provide a Paypal account.
What part of “not just” don’t you understand?So, when you said before that scientists were claiming this, you were lying -- is that it?
Do you have a better explanation for how the singularity rapidly expanded to become the universe we live in today? or do you have None whatsoever?From a strictly scientific point of view, what would be the difference between saying "God did it," and saying "Magical Space Llamas did it?"
What's that, you say? None whatsoever?
Can you empirically demonstrate how the universe created itself from the singularity? or is this just baseless nonsense?I got a better one. One day, the universe decided to create itself.
What's that baseless nonsense, you say? Exactly.
It is the Big Bang theorists who assume there was a cause, not me. I am simply offering an explanation of that cause, and God being the cause makes more sense to me, weather He did it miraculously, mathemiracally, or mathemagically."Goddidit" is nothing more than "Assume there was a cause. Call that cause 'God'. Therefore, God did it". That's not an explanation, that's semantics.
So you believe “Skaloop did it” instead of “God did it”.I have an explanation. I did it. I created the entirety of existence, and I did so exactly as it appears in the historical/geological/paleontological record. That's a much better explanation than "God did it" because mine is not open to debate. I did it exactly how it looks like I did it. Show me wrong, I dare you to try.
Based on my personal experience of God it is logical for me and many Christian scientists to conclude that God did it, in addition to the fact that scientists can offer no better explanation of what caused the singularity to rapidly expand to become the universe we live in today.You see that word I highlighted there? That's the reason why "Goddidit" is a hypothesis. I don't have a concrete theory, but that doesn't mean we should jump to an unfounded conclusion because it "seems" to be a good one. Instead, we must accept that we don't actually know, and work to find out the truth.
Is Big Bang a hypothesis?"God did it" is a hypothesis. Replaced God with your word of choice ("Cheese did it") and you have another hypothesis.
If God did it, then God was the cause and the universe rapidly expanding from the singularity is the effect."Come up with an entirely different idea ("Nothing can actually create something given that the laws of cause and effect were not in place") and you have another hypothesis. None of these are theories.
Then the Big Bang never happened because making up answers that seem right just works to stifle what knowledge we may actually get.The correct answer to "how the the universe begin" is "we don't know yet". Making up answers that seem right just works to stifle what knowledge we may actually get.
What part of “not just” don’t you understand?
Do you have a better explanation for how the singularity rapidly expanded to become the universe we live in today? or do you have None whatsoever?
__________________
Can you empirically demonstrate how the universe created itself from the singularity? or is this just baseless nonsense?
__________________
It is the Big Bang theorists who assume there was a cause, not me. I am simply offering an explanation of the cause, and God being the cause makes more sense to me, weather He did it miraculously, mathemiracally, or mathemagically.
Do you have a better explanation of what caused the singularity to rapidly expand to become the universe we live in today?
__________________
So you believe “Skaloop did it” instead of “God did it”.
Can you empirically demonstrate how “Skaloop did it”?
Can you empirically demonstrate how “Skaloop” was able to cause the universe to rapidly expand from the singularity that was smaller than a proton to the size the universe is today - 156 billion light-years radius - and how “Skaloop” was able to accomplish this feat in only 13.7 billion years?
You occasionally come out with these little nuggets of sense, but don't seem to recognise how they apply to your own situation.Then the Big Bang never happened. Making up answers that seem right just works to stifle what knowledge we may actually get.
The Big Bang is not a theory on the origins of the universe, it simply describes how the universe has developed over the past 13.5 billion years; what happened before then is currently unknown.It is the Big Bang theorists who assume there was a cause, not me.
An explanation is not "X did it, where X is whatever it is that did it", since that is just tautologous wordplay. You have not offered an explanation of the cause, you've simply given it a label.I am simply offering an explanation of that cause, and God being the cause makes more sense to me, weather He did it miraculously, mathemiracally, or mathemagically.
Yes: Zeus did it. Aliens did it. My can of Strongbow did it.Do you have a better explanation of what caused the singularity to rapidly expand to become the universe we live in today?
Can you do any of that, replacing 'Skaloop' with 'God' and vice versa?So you believe Skaloop did it instead of God did it.
Can you empirically demonstrate how Skaloop did it?
Can you empirically demonstrate how Skaloop was able to cause the universe to rapidly expand from the singularity that was smaller than a proton to the size the universe is today - 156 billion light-years in diameter - and how Skaloop was able to accomplish this feat in only 13.7 billion years?
Based on my personal experience of God it is logical for me and many Christian scientists to conclude that God did it, in addition to the fact that scientists can offer no better explanation of what caused the singularity to rapidly expand to become the universe we live in today.
It's a theory (no matter how much you may stamp your foot).Is Big Bang a hypothesis?
And if cheese did it, then cheese was the cause and the blah blah blah.If God did it, then God was the cause and the universe rapidly expanding from the singularity is the effect.
Please, please, please demonstrate how the Big Bang theory is a made-up answer designed to stifle proper science.Then the Big Bang never happened because making up answers that seem right just works to stifle what knowledge we may actually get.
Do you have a better explanation for how the singularity rapidly expanded to become the universe we live in today? or do you have None whatsoever?
There would be no Big Bang without a Bang.The Big Bang is not a theory on the origins of the universe, it simply describes how the universe has developed over the past 13.5 billion years; what happened before then is currently unknown.
If you're going to criticise a theory, it helps if you know what it actually says.
Well, you are making it pretty obvious that the peer-review bible does not have a better explanation.Zeus did it. Aliens did it. My can of Strongbow did it.
If you cannot empirically demonstrate that there was indeed a Bang or what caused the Bang, why should I believe the peer-review bible instead of the Holy Bible?
So you believe Skaloop did it instead of God did it.
Can you empirically demonstrate how Skaloop did it?
Can you empirically demonstrate how Skaloop was able to cause the universe to rapidly expand from the singularity that was smaller than a proton to the size the universe is today - 156 billion light-years in diameter - and how Skaloop was able to accomplish this feat in only 13.7 billion years?
Do you have a peer-review source. If not, then it's not science. Sorry.
So let's all just accept that we are all relying on faith, and not on science, and get ourselves some rest from this debate.Neither is the Bible, so your idea is not science. Sorry.
So let's all just accept that we are all relying on faith, and not on science, and get ourselves some rest from this debate.
So let's all just accept that we are all relying on faith, and not on science, and get ourselves some rest from this debate.
Yeah, right.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?