• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does 'Goddidit' constitute an explanation? (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
So then, how can you posit that it wasn't created as you did earlier?

I never posited it wasn't created. Read again; I was merely presenting another possibility because the truth is that we simply don't know.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Originally Posted by SkyWriting
Science does not allow for matter from nothing, intelligence where there is none, or spontaneous complexity and order.

Science demands a first cause for all these things. That is a non-natural power and intelligence. Or Super-Natural or unscientific explanation.

I was mostly with you here until that emphasized, baseless assumption.

Obviously I have a base for my comment.

There is a law of thermodynamics, which we've covered,
and there is a law of Conservation of information.
It can be summarized in a thousand ways:
- Everyone in computer class knows it as Garbage in - Garbage out.
- Normal life says, Perfectly neat & Clean house at 8 am, plus teenage boy = pig-sty by 8pm.
- Everything normally degrades, especially under a sunlamp.
- Stuff rots
- People forget
- etc.

The myth is, shine a sunlamp on something stupid like slop, and it becomes an intelligent human.
Yet all natural laws and Scientific observations say otherwise.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
No, just trying to have a conversation. If our universe has an infinite past, however, you have a problem of how we got here with an infinite amount of necessary prior events.

First, I don't believe that time is 'infinitely old,' if that makes any sense.

Second, it doesn't seem like a conversation to be honest. You're making a lot of assumptions, putting words in people's mouths, and then trying to have people disprove the notions that you've injected into your prejudices.

And quite honestly, the only one making wild guesses is you. You seem seem to be completely content with assigning traits, a will, desires, etc to something you don't know. If you do KNOW, you must have evidence, and please prove me wrong. I was merely making an observation that, as far as we can tell, there's a lot of different possible explanations but none, so far, suggest an intelligence that we can discern.
 
Upvote 0

Jnwaco

Regular Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,376
49
✟24,303.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Actually, I've read a good bit about most of the mainstream scientific theory. And it's utter rubbish to run around demanding proof. Read the Bible. Either you believe it's historical or not. As far as what suggests intelligence is not subject to scientific discovery, but merely opinion, so just because we can't discern intelligence doesn't mean that the laws of physics, math, logic, and morality, which seem fairly orderly, do not have an intelligence at least strongly suggested. I'm still waiting for science to find a good answer as to why we're here. I'm not holding my breath.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
No, just trying to have a conversation. If our universe has an infinite past, however, you have a problem of how we got here with an infinite amount of necessary prior events.
Not really. Since there is an infinite amount of time 'behind' us, that's how we got to 'now': an infinite amount of time. The fallacy in your thinking is that we have to get to 'here' from some origin point. But, obviously, we don't: there is no origin point.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single

None of the laws of thermodynamics say "...unless an intelligent supernatural being intervenes."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Actually, I've read a good bit about most of the mainstream scientific theory. And it's utter rubbish to run around demanding proof. Read the Bible. Either you believe it's historical or not.
False dichotomy. You can believe the parts of the Bible that are backed up by evidence, historical or otherwise. Why do you believe those parts that are not backed up by any evidence?

Of course, if we can't discern an intelligence, why would we wish to attribute it the universe to one? I think that's the key thing; You WANT to believe an intelligent creator created the universe so you interpret patterns in that fashion. Personally, I couldn't care less if we find one or not. Either way, my universe won't come crashing down, I won't feel hopeless nor desperate. It would be exciting, for sure, to find a god out there but unlike you, I am not against my atheism being wrong.

I'm still waiting for science to find a good answer as to why we're here. I'm not holding my breath.

As in purpose or what do you mean?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
This is hilarious! I'm calling Poe.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
I'm still waiting for science to find a good answer as to why we're here. I'm not holding my breath.

I'm still waiting for religion to offer a good answer as to why there needs to be a reason for why we are here.
 
Upvote 0

Jnwaco

Regular Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,376
49
✟24,303.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married

If there is no origin point, then there is an infinite past, which is definitely a problem.
 
Upvote 0

Jnwaco

Regular Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,376
49
✟24,303.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
False dichotomy. You can believe the parts of the Bible that are backed up by evidence, historical or otherwise. Why do you believe those parts that are not backed up by any evidence?

I accept the written evidence, find the Christian faith to make sense, etc.


Fair enough, except I disagree with the hopeless part.

As in purpose or what do you mean?
Not necessarily purpose - but just the why as in why something other than nothing.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I accept the written evidence, find the Christian faith to make sense, etc.
Why do you accept THAT written evidence and not other evidence (written, historical, empirical, etc) that contradicts it?

Fair enough, except I disagree with the hopeless part.
Good to see that you wouldn't be hopeless if we discovered there was no god, somehow.

Not necessarily purpose - but just the why as in why something other than nothing.

I don't know but I think the question could be rephrased the other way: Why should nothing exist instead of something?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
If there is no origin point, then there is an infinite past, which is definitely a problem.
Why? You said the problem is how "we got here with an infinite amount of necessary prior events", yet the solution is simple: we do have an infinite amount of prior events (or, to be more precise, time).
 
Upvote 0

Exiledoomsayer

Only toke me 1 year to work out how to change this
Jan 7, 2010
2,196
64
✟25,237.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
He's not saying we have a infinite past. he's saying we have a infinite ammount of prior events, if you count the prior events that will take place in the future.
prior events = time.
if we had inifite past then the time we are in now is after infinite amount of time has past. which isnt particulary possible

about the anthropic principle though. the universe now is less ordered then the singularity of energy isnt it? So it fits just fine.

edit:
if i totally misunderstood what you meant wiccan do correct me later on heh.
 
Upvote 0

Jnwaco

Regular Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,376
49
✟24,303.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Right, I'm not talking about units of time - just that change from one state to another implies time.

Also, I'm not using the law of thermodynamics here to say that our existence violates some law of nature. As long as entropy increases in a greater amount than by which it decreased on earth, there's no problem there. I've seen that argument from some creationists, but I'm not really sure it holds.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.