- Nov 13, 2017
- 12,212
- 12,468
- Country
- Romania
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The difficulty comes in why Jesus spoke of them as real people. Also, if it never happened there is no meaning.
I’ve given it a lot more thought than you have. That’s why I see what you do not.No, and no. If you give it some thought you’ll see why.
What events in the Bible do you think are established as not ever happening to real people? Please include how this is established, thanks.That’s the thing - the examples of literal interpretation I have seen sometimes involve a person getting what is meant, but then, for some other reason, adding ‘oh but it is also literally true’.
Where it can be established that a literal interpretation was not meant, then the result is generally a mish mash of meanings that include some literal elements and some stuff about what the purpose of the story was.
I’ve given it a lot more thought than you have. That’s why I see what you do not.
It needs to be established Jesus was merely wanting to illustrate something. The parables, for example, are that clearly and it’s not hard to imagine they really happen either.Sure, maybe? You can explain what you mean if you like. This idea that Jesus must have been ‘lying’ if he invented situations to illustrate a story is a non-starter.
But men really do go in journeys and they really do get attacked. Still happens. People lose coins. Sheep wander off. People celebrate events and invite others.If that is lying then pretty much anyone who has ever taught anyone about anything is a liar, anyone who uses figurative language (as we all do, all the time) is a liar, and to prevent lying you’d need to go way back in time to somehow prevent the development of our ability to make symbolic connections, in which case we wouldn’t be having this conversation in the first place. Do you think that Jesus would only say ‘there was a man who went on a journey...’ and so on if he was referring to an actual person?
Might as well ask how we’d communicate if metaphors were verboten. What is to be gained? As I said, women really do lose coins. Sheep wander off. Fathers welcome wayward sons.It’s worth reflecting on what would have been left of Jesus’ message if he had been an obsessive semantic legalist bent on removing the use of metaphor and allegory from his teachings.
What is the meaning that was supposed to be conveyed in your opinion? I’m curious.One can believe in the historicity of the Genesis account and not grasp the meaning conveyed. Another can grasp the meaning conveyed and yet not believe its historicity. Which one has the best part of the one who believes both its historicity and grasps the meaning conveyed? The later, for sure. Believing the historicity does one no good if that is all one has. Moreover, having both is not necessary. I would say, when it comes to the Genesis account, only the meaning is necessary.
Tom, I’m still waiting. What events in the bible are established (in the Bible) as never intended to talk about real people?
Shouldn’t take long. How many events in the Bible can there be that are firmly established in the Bible as never happening? I think I called your bluff.Hi, I'll answer your posts in order but I don't want to get sucked into spending ages on it, sorry, stuff to do.
Let’s test it. Why do you sayJesus spoke of the events with Adam and Eve as real?
But men really do go in journeys and they really do get attacked. Still happens. People lose coins. Sheep wander off. People celebrate events and invite others.
Shouldn’t take long.
Tom, I’m still waiting. What events in the bible are established (in the Bible) as never intended to talk about real people?
Shouldn’t take long. How many events in the Bible can there be that are firmly established in the Bible as never happening? I think I called your bluff.
What symbolic naming of other creatures? In order for a story to teach it has to be telling us something we don’t otherwise know. Mans duty to work is know without the story. Societal unity, disunity, and responsibility is not taught from that story at all. And it is learned in life. None of those points are taught in the story. These things don’t need to be taught in the Bible. They are known in life.As below:
There were also first people. Later people needed some way of framing their understanding of their place in the world. It's all there in the text - why 'man' and 'mother of all' (or some similar variant), why not 'Bob' and 'Jean' or somesuch? Why the symbolic naming of other creatures, the carefully specific mentions of man's duties, the allegories of belonging, unity, disunity, responsiblity and so on? Read as intended, it provides much more useful lessons that the notion of 'original sin' and all that.
Why? It didn’t take long.Lol! That's a good one.
What symbolic naming of other creatures? In order for a story to teach it has to be telling us something we don’t otherwise know. Mans duty to work is know without the story. Societal unity, disunity, and responsibility is not taught from that story at all. And it is learned in life. None of those points are taught in the story. These things don’t need to be taught in the Bible. They are known in life.
What it teaches is WHY we have to do those things and if those people never lived, it cannot teach us that. It’s lessons depend entirely on it being real, as Jesus knew it to be.
Why? It didn’t take long.
An event happened, one person decides to write of it sooner, another decides to write it down later. Does this mean the person who wrote it down later is copying the first? Not at all, especially not if it was directed by God to write down the correct story. The very fact that civilizations across the globe have flood stories points back to it being true. People split at the Tower of babble, they took the stories with them as all stories go people changed, embellished or got parts wrong until the society made the story into what it is. The Bible, on the other hand, is God-breathed. It is not a meer tale written down, but a written record of us to what God has done, is doing and will do. If one piece of scripture is a fairy tale then why would the rest be true?
2 Timothy 3:16-17
16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
All scripture is God-breathed including Genesis. The events in the Bible were written down under God's directive as the scripture is the word of God or don't you believe that?
Next, you have no idea of what we believe as yet once again 6,000 years comes trotting out as if this is what all YE creationists cling to. Those of us who believe in creation, the global flood and 6-day creation believe anywhere from 6 to 50 thousand years so you might want to update your 'knowledge' of us. Not everyone follows Usser.
As to 4.6 billion, that comes directly from secular science which is man's attempt to understand the world. Word of man or word of God? I know which one I will believe.
The author is immaterial to the accounts in those first 5 books.Well, you appear to have taken my 'where it can be established...' to mean something other than what I meant, if you mean can it be proved beyond doubt then of course no, that would be literally impossible, but there are certainly things that can safely be taken to be allegorical, or non-literal at least, on the basis of the evidence in the text itself.
On a bit of a tangent, but relevant I think, is the authorship of the Torah. It is an article of faith for some, for reasons I don't personally understand - perhaps because this came out of the Jewish tradition? - that Moses wrote the Torah. However there is clear evidence of different styles, indicating multiple authors. In the same way as you can read say Mark Twain and Bulgakov and identify differences in style, scholars of Hebrew can see the styles of different authors in the writing of the Torah (as we have it).
Another issue is the use of numbers - 40 for example, used to indicate 'a long time'. The Israelites were in the desert for 40 years - were they? In ancient writings numbers were used freely (in the Sumerian king list kings ruled for 10s of thousands of years) or symbolically, often. Clearly the writers of the OT didnt have the same relationship either with numbers, or dates, or accurate reporting for the sake of accurate reporting as we do, in the modern world. They thought about the whole business very differently, as is evident in the text.
Anyway I realise this kind of thing requires a paradigm shift in thinking, and I don't have the time to put into going through the layers of it, but there is plenty out there you can read about this kind of approach to study of the bible, you might find it interesting.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?