• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do we really need Amendment XVI?

Jump to latest Follow Reply

Should the government be allowed to directly tax income?

  • Yes.

  • No.

  • Bake me some magical brownies, because your poll is annoying and doesn't include my answer.

Results are only viewable after voting.
Sort by date Sort by votes

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,426
7,164
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟423,719.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Our taxes are still low compared to most other developed, first world countries. Marginal tax rates in western Europe are usually 40-50% or more. (But they provide more social services--notably, health care.) Interestingly, many former communist countries in eatern Europe are going to a flat tax.
 
Upvote 0

CCGirl

Resident Commie
Sep 21, 2005
9,271
563
Canada
✟34,870.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
I don't know what the alternative could be to not providing income to the govt. This is vital in a modern, civilized nation. We all enjoy driving on decent roads, libraries, schools, health care, military, police, firemen, etc. Those cost money and lay the basis for stability.


What alternatives are there?
 
Upvote 0
U

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Do we want to provide for a national defense, highways, clean water, clean air, safe food, safe pharmaceuticals, people to run our government and their salaries, weather forecasters, and all the other services we take for granted every day which are provided by the government -- and which we pay for with out tax dollars?

If we're talking about cutting wasteful spending -- well, I've got plenty of ideas to help there and as I've said before, our government has gone amok with really stupid ideas to spend money and run up deficits.

On the other hand, I really don't expect my ideas to be taken seriously by conservatives because after all -- I am a liberal, so anymore I expect my ideas to be rejected outright by conservatives who probably don't even bother to read (let alone consider) my ideas.

Just calling things as I see them...
 
Upvote 0
U

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Voegelin said:
Sure tax incomes. Just don't allow anyone on a government payroll to vote. Their #1 priority to increase taxes and give themselves raises.
Click to expand...

Including secretaries, admins, the people who clean government buildings, the people who work in the national parks, and all the people who show up every day to do their jobs (and happen to work for the U.S. government)?

Oh: since those people work for the government, they shouldn't get to vote?
 
Upvote 0

TScott

Curmudgeon
Apr 19, 2002
3,353
161
78
Arizona
Visit site
✟26,974.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Democrat
Voegelin said:
Sure tax incomes. Just don't allow anyone on a government payroll to vote. Their #1 priority to increase taxes and give themselves raises.
Click to expand...
Yeah. Many of them are men in women in the military. They shouldn't be allowed to vote for the people who send them off to die...
 
Upvote 0
H

hippie

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2005
869
48
73
Maine
✟1,252.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ballfan said:
Its fair to tax incomes. Its even fair to tax some more than others. The money needed to run the country has to come from somewhere.
Click to expand...

You may consider it "fair" to tax incomes. I disagree.

You may find it "fair" to tax some more than others. I find that reprehensible and tantamont to legal thievery. It cannot be "fair" for someone to pay more than than an equiatable prorata share.
 
Upvote 0

TScott

Curmudgeon
Apr 19, 2002
3,353
161
78
Arizona
Visit site
✟26,974.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Democrat
I think it is fair for more wealthy people to pay a higher percentage than lower income people in income tax. In most cases it is the wealthy people who gain most of the benefits from government spending. Consider that the whole purpose of building a national military was to protect our commerce overseas. That was the original platform of the Republican Party.

Besides, one of the paramount reasons that a progressive income tax system was instituted in the first place was to redistribute the wealth. That is how it was sold to the masses.
 
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
What other countries are doing should be irrelevent to good policy and right action. Certainly they can be used as examples of how effective certain policies are, but just the fact that they have higher or lower taxes shouldn't matter.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Supreme Court weighs First Amendment’s religion clause tensions
Replies
0
Views
238
Current News & Events (Articles Required)
Michie
L
Why was it good for Churches to flee the public sphere?
Replies
11
Views
630
General Theology
Aaron112
Don't Trust the Voters
Replies
6
Views
602
General Political Discussion
Gene2memE
G
Let Biden go in peace. Do we really need to gloat and jeer?
Replies
101
Views
5K
General Politics
RileyG
Is Christian Libertarianism Consistent With Voting? A Personal View.
Replies
14
Views
828
General Politics
Grafted In
G
Menu
Log in
Register