Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Can you describe what you mean?
Interesting assertion. Do you have any evidence to support it?
You have no proof to offer and cannot bear the burden of your preachy little godless religion.Once again you seem befuddled by the concept of "burden of proof."
You made the claim that science is based on nothing but beliefs. You must show the support for that claim, or your claim is meaningless.
Right, science will be a memorial and laughing stock of how low man can sink, and how utterly stupid he can become when rejecting Jesus.Yeah...a new heavens and a new earth...wherein corruption will be done away with...no more entropy and unnatural science...just like in the beginning!
Neither God nor His word are in my head, and your creation fables are nowhere else but in your noggan.As I stated, you just don't have any system for differentiating your particular beliefs for any other sincere interpretations or intuitions for anyone outside your own head.
None of which support evolution.Things like DNA of extant species and the isotope percentages of dead terrestrial species seem to be objective points of fact that don't change with the spirituality and intuitions of viewers.
I'm flattered that you find my posts so difficult to respond to.I've already got BB on READ ONLY status for now for the same antics.
I'd hate to do the same for you.
You're one of the more honest academians here.
Can you give me some specific examples of how scientific research is subjective?Look up the etymology of the word "science"...it is reductionist...how do you take a step back and look at the whole if all you are doing with ^ is dividing? It is very subjective in that it doesn't consider the other aspects of our beings; will, emotions, imagination, etc.... The funny thing is, it actually does, but those who want to dichotomize belief and reason, swear that it is a purely intellectual pursuit...but, everything about it...it's methods and measures...is subjective.
Please try to be civil.Neither God nor His word are in my head, and your creation fables are nowhere else but in your noggan
.
They do, but I have no interest in discussing them with someone who doesn't agree with me on how the concept of evidence works. Why don't we just leave of discussing how the past works on this thread?None of which support evolution.
Can you give me some specific examples of how scientific research is subjective?
Hey hey
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...gQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw1_9Jrv0QYwIl8VG5UhxqmI&cf=1
What u think?
Cheers
Huh? There is an ongoing human caused extinction event, but it pales in comparison to previous natural extinctions.This "Science" (dividing of corruption) has led to more species being eradicated off the face of the earth, than anything else.
What do I think about a manufactroversey from 2011 written by a non expert political hack funded by the fossil fuel industry and far right corporate interests who has been shown to be so wrong, about so much, so many times that actual scientific researchers asked he stop making stuff up and 180 degrees misinterpreting their papers and positions?
I dont think I could actually post an honest comment on the article in question without getting a lifelong site ban for the levels of profanity and character assassination I would rend upon it.
You have no proof to offer and cannot bear the burden of your preachy little godless religion.
There are issues with this example.Hey hey
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...gQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw1_9Jrv0QYwIl8VG5UhxqmI&cf=1
A new batch of 5,000 emails among scientists central to the assertion that humans are causing a global warming crisis were anonymously released to the public yesterday, igniting a new firestorm of controversy nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited the Climategate scandal.
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
Regarding scientific transparency, a defining characteristic of science is the open sharing of scientific data, theories and procedures so that independent parties, and especially skeptics of a particular theory or hypothesis, can replicate and validate asserted experiments or observations. Emails between Climategate scientists, however, show a concerted effort to hide rather than disseminate underlying evidence and procedures
What u think?
Cheers
It depends on your definition of "really". Because a house cat and a tiger are different creatures.if a cat stay as a cat (house cat vs a tiger)- then its not realy a new creature.
if a cat stay as a cat (house cat vs a tiger)- then its not realy a new creature.
Thats why I cannot take YEC seriously. They are so inconsistent. Their agenda is just a try to say this or that against evolution, but they have no coherent system that makes sense.So, a house cat and a tiger are the same kind of creature. Makes sense, since the genetic similarity between a cat and a tiger is about 95.6%.
House cats and tigers share 95.6 percent of DNA, study reveals
So when Humans and chimps share 99% genetic similarity, I guess that means that humans and chimps are the same kind of creature too, huh?
House cats and tigers share 95.6 percent of DNA, study reveals
Thats why I cannot take YEC seriously. They are so inconsistent.
And yet every creationist who ever lived believes IN THE BEGINNING GOD.Creationists routinely contradict each other on orders of magnitude greater than anything in science.
I would expand that to include creationism in general. Creationists routinely contradict each other on orders of magnitude greater than anything in science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?