Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Shifting the burden of proof is akin to admitting that one is wrong.Quit stalling and get out there on the sea and look for those footprints!
And if you don't find any, I'm still going to believe He walked there.
I'm not bound to evidence (or the lack thereof) like you are.
Don't worry -- there's nothing to shift.Shifting the burden of proof is akin to admitting that one is wrong.
You'll believe anything the Bible says including BOTH sides of a contradictory statement.Quit stalling and get out there on the sea and look for those footprints!
And if you don't find any, I'm still going to believe He walked there.
I'm not bound to evidence (or the lack thereof) like you are.
1) You have to exist to leave footprints.Don't worry -- there's nothing to shift.
Anyone who thinks Jesus' footprints on the sea of Galilee constitutes a burden of proof is ... well ... educated.
I'll try to remember that, the next time someone says this:You'll believe anything the Bible says including BOTH sides of a contradictory statement.
So you go look for something that doesn't exist. I have no desire to play your obtuse games.
In order for something to be real there has to be evidence that it happened.
Looks like you're SOL then.2) You can't walk on water.
3) You can't leave a footprint on water.
Might want to learn what "evidence" means. You can't ask someone for stupid things like "footprints in water" or "a box of steam."I'll try to remember that, the next time someone says this:
That is true. The inability to find the Ark is the weakest argument against that myth. Ice floats is perhaps the shortest refutation of the Ark.
And of course one of my personal favorites, only because creationists can never understand it even though it is true:
The fact that waking up in cheap hotel room in an ice filled bathtub missing a kidney is an urban myth refutes the Ark story.
Bet you a dollar he posts a footprint in snow and tries to go down that road.
Oh my, it appears that AV just refuted his own beliefs.Don't worry -- there's nothing to shift.
Anyone who thinks Jesus' footprints on the sea of Galilee constitutes a burden of proof is ... well ... educated.
Gladly. Cheetahs are the key.So explain it. I don't get it either.
He didn't like my claim that *I'd* walked on water many times, but Jesus couldn't because the "Sea of Galilee" doesn't freeze over.
Gladly. Cheetahs are the key.
If there was a flood as in the Bible there should be a universal extreme population bottleneck. About 10 thousand years ago African cheetahs went through such a bottleneck. It has been calculated that they got down to on the order of 10 breeding cheetahs. As a result of that event all cheetahs are terribly inbred. Think of Alabama on steroids. Any two randomly chosen cheetahs are apt to be more closely related to each other than you are to your own brothers and sisters (barring identical twins). This has been tested by skin grafts. The skin is an organ. It is the largest organ in our body and foreign skin will be rejected just as a foreign internal organ will be. They can do skin grafts on cheetahs with no rejection. I can find quite a few articles on the ability to transplant skin grafts and what it means, but I am not finding the one that gave the magnitude of the bottleneck. For example this one:
Conservation Genetics of the Cheetah: Lessons Learned and New Opportunities
I might have to work on my Google fu a bit. At any rate if the flood happened a mere four thousand years ago there would be no problem with transplants. One could wake up missing a kidney because some stranger needed one.
Face it, Flood believers are just deniers. They refuse to reason logically so one might as well have some fun with them.I figure it's a myth because you would not wake up.
Anyway the connection is too obscure, you won't
have any luck with that argument.
Most likely they just think you are being weird.Face it, Flood believers are just deniers. They refuse to reason logically so one might as well have some fun with them.
Look's like you're SOL then.Water has physical properties that prevent it from maintaining a footprint. So your little rant about Jesus' footprints in water is, well, UNeducated.
Well, He's kinda busy right now.Phred said:Where's Jesus? He's alive you say. He's not dead you claim. So get him to show up and convince everyone that he actually exists. You know, IF he actually exists.
Most likely they just think you are being weird.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?